Death or This God-awful threak?

Discussion in 'Social Life, Food & Drink, Travel' started by itsstillmatt, Jul 8, 2010.

  1. Vintage Gent

    Vintage Gent Senior member

    Messages:
    2,748
    Likes Received:
    26
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Location:
    The People's Republic of Galveston
    It's indisputable that the number of calories obtainable per acre of farmland is much, much higher for grain and vegetables than for meat, even leaving aside the animal suffering involved. Are there major ecological issues with the way all food is produced in the world today? Of course. But then I haven't seen anyone claiming otherwise. Have fun with your straw men.
    What is also indisputable is that gigantic tracts of non-arable land produce meat.
    OK, gents, I know it's inconvenient to let facts get in the way, but Slate examined this very question: http://www.slate.com/id/2176420
     


  2. samus

    samus Senior member

    Messages:
    376
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2007
    What is also indisputable is that gigantic tracts of non-arable land produce meat.

    You're right. I'm not arguing that we should stop using non-arable land for those purposes. I just find it laughable when people argue that adding land for vegetable farming is wasteful or bad for the environment when how many millions of acres of pristine rainforest have been destroyed for cattle farming, and the insult to injury is how much more productive vegetable farming is, in terms of feeding the world.

    If we have to destroy forests to grow food (and I don't necessarily think we do), we might as well make the most of it. Using non-arable land to grow livestock (or the sea, gome) is in line with that principle.
     


  3. gomestar

    gomestar Super Yelper

    Messages:
    19,407
    Likes Received:
    3,871
    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Location:
    NYC
    IC
     


  4. kwilkinson

    kwilkinson Having a Ball

    Messages:
    33,652
    Likes Received:
    857
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Location:
    Chicago
    This thread took a serious turn for the dull.
     


  5. itsstillmatt

    itsstillmatt The Liberator Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    14,384
    Likes Received:
    2,047
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Location:
    The wild and the pure.
    This thread took a serious turn for the dull.
    +1.
     


  6. Valor

    Valor Senior member

    Messages:
    836
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Location:
    NYC
    I have a question for you vegetarians out there, why won't you eat meat?

    Will you eat fish? Oysters?

    Is it because of animal suffering? Not all animals feel pain for instance.
    How did you draw an arbitrary line between the Animal and plant kingdoms and decide one was ok and another was not?

    What's the logical basis for being a vegetarian?
     


  7. Vintage Gent

    Vintage Gent Senior member

    Messages:
    2,748
    Likes Received:
    26
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Location:
    The People's Republic of Galveston
    IC

    You must really be kidding. You pull a quote completely out of context, when the next paragraph partially refutes it:

     


  8. ratboycom

    ratboycom Senior member

    Messages:
    3,682
    Likes Received:
    6
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2006
    Location:
    Nagoya, Japan
    One of my cousins turned into a raw vegan after college. He used to weigh around 250 lbs, now is down around 160 and is as tall as me. Though, he looks like death.

    I guess he was visiting his brothers a week ago and had a bite of pepperoni pizza and commented on how good it was, but it would destroy his bowels if he ate a whole piece.
     


  9. Vintage Gent

    Vintage Gent Senior member

    Messages:
    2,748
    Likes Received:
    26
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Location:
    The People's Republic of Galveston
    What's the logical basis for being a vegetarian?

    A fair amount of empirical evidence suggests it offers considerable health benefits, including both an increase in the quality and quantity of life.
     


  10. itsstillmatt

    itsstillmatt The Liberator Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    14,384
    Likes Received:
    2,047
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Location:
    The wild and the pure.
    You must really be kidding. You pull a quote completely out of context, when the next paragraph partially refutes it:
    It isn't refuted, it is qualified. Big difference.
     


  11. samus

    samus Senior member

    Messages:
    376
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2007
    This is the height of silliness.

    I call it like I see it. I don't attribute this to you, but there are many others in this thread to whom I do.

    lol wut? No it wasn't. It was started to find out how much the various people here valued eating a highly varied diet. I really don't care what other people eat. Why would I?

    Uh huh. "Death or Veganism?" = "Do you value a highly varied diet?" Come on now, you even said this was a response to people in the Veal thread. This hasn't for one second been a good-faith discussion of variety in cuisine.

    Besides, I bet the average vegan or vegetarian has a more varied diet than the average American omnivore.
     


  12. itsstillmatt

    itsstillmatt The Liberator Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    14,384
    Likes Received:
    2,047
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Location:
    The wild and the pure.
    A fair amount of empirical evidence suggests it offers considerable health benefits, including both an increase in the quality and quantity of life.
    What kind of empirical evidence is there for quality of life? How does one measure it? Utes?
     


  13. Valor

    Valor Senior member

    Messages:
    836
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Location:
    NYC
    A fair amount of empirical evidence suggests it offers considerable health benefits, including both an increase in the quality and quantity of life.

    What if I weight eating meat strongly in terms of utils compared to health benefits? Then I shouldn't be vegetarian right? And did these studies even take into account other factors? I seriously doubt the validity of most studies into length of life due to the exogenous factors.
     


  14. Vintage Gent

    Vintage Gent Senior member

    Messages:
    2,748
    Likes Received:
    26
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Location:
    The People's Republic of Galveston
    What kind of empirical evidence is there for quality of life? How does one measure it? Utes?

    Reduced incidence of illness and disease--e.g. cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer.
     


  15. itsstillmatt

    itsstillmatt The Liberator Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    14,384
    Likes Received:
    2,047
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Location:
    The wild and the pure.
    I call it like I see it. I don't attribute this to you, but there are many others in this thread to whom I do.



    Uh huh. "Death or Veganism?" = "Do you value a highly varied diet?" Come on now, you even said this was a response to people in the Veal thread. This hasn't for one second been a good-faith discussion of variety in cuisine.

    Besides, I bet the average vegan or vegetarian has a more varied diet than the average American omnivore.

    Tongue was planted firmly in cheek when I started the threak, and it has continued to be so throughout. So you are right, it wasn't good faith, but good fun, at least from my point of view. Anyway, I really don't care what somebody else does. It does bother me when somebody gets preachy to another person about what they should eat, whether it is that they should try liver, eat only vegetables, eat meat, whatever.
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by