1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

Dating is dead

Discussion in 'Social Life, Food & Drink, Travel' started by MetroStyles, Jun 12, 2008.

  1. MetroStyles

    MetroStyles Senior member

    Messages:
    15,831
    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Location:
    New York Shitty
    I agree. It's not being busy that causes people to not date. Scheduled dates are much much better for someone who has a busy schedule.

    I think, sometimes anyway, the problem is they just want to keep their options wide open. If they schedule a date, then an awesome party comes up, well... you don't wanna miss the party to go on some silly date with someone you aren't sure will put out. Hell, there are probably 10 girls at this awesome party who'll go to bed with you.

    If it's not a date, then it's also less serious, so you can be seeing 3 or more girls at once and it's 'cool'.

    They also don't wanna be rejected. If there's no date, then it's not serious, and if they get turned it's not a problem.

    Shallow, lazy, fickle and detached.

    ... That all sounded a bit more aggressive than it probably should have. It's late and I've been drinking! I've done the whole casual seeing girls not dating them thing too. Although I think most of the above rules fit me when I was like that.


    I think some of your ideas are right on point. I disagree with the shallowness and laziness - I do not think that because someone prefers dating multiple people they are shallow - they could be getting to know these people very well. I also don't think it's being lazy - if you are not in the market for an exclusive relationship (i.e. the reason some people aren't is that they don't want a girl to become attached and then heart-broken 4 months later - I used to think this way) it may be because it doesn't suit your life at that time.

    However, I think the rest is spot on. Good post.
     
  2. slycedbred

    slycedbred Senior member

    Messages:
    1,494
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2007
    They said in 1980. And 1960. And 1940. And 1920. I'm sure our hunter-gatherer forefathers shook their heads and grunted in quiet despair at the crazy youngsters with their "Farms" and "Agriculture." 'Thog think humanity doomed. Youth today too lazy to hunt mammoth and bang wife on head.'

    If we listen to the old, humanity has been in a death spiral towards oblivion since day 1. I think we'll get by.


    I guess this just means that the world's always been in a sorry state....Cuz it has.
     
  3. Shraka

    Shraka Senior member

    Messages:
    628
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    I think some of your ideas are right on point. I disagree with the shallowness and laziness - I do not think that because someone prefers dating multiple people they are shallow - they could be getting to know these people very well. I also don't think it's being lazy - if you are not in the market for an exclusive relationship (i.e. the reason some people aren't is that they don't want a girl to become attached and then heart-broken 4 months later - I used to think this way) it may be because it doesn't suit your life at that time.

    However, I think the rest is spot on. Good post.


    Firstly, thank you. I'm glad I can be spot on while my vision faded in and out (not too drunk, and not too tired, but the combination of the two is quite strong!)

    My post was in regards to most of the people who are like this. I'm sure some aren't shallow, but a lot are. Or a lot that I've seen anyway. They may not be a shallow person, but they are often being shallow. When I was having flings with one girl after the next, and not being serious about anything, I was being very shallow. I couldn't get to know any of them well because things just moved too damned fast. But anyway, I agree, not all are shallow. My point was more these are the problems, and that people who are like this have a mix of those problems, not that one has to have the complete gamete of these problems to be like this.

    As for lazy, I absolutely disagree. It is more often than not very lazy, but again, it's not always lazy. You don't put anything on the line, (in that way it may actually be cowardly) and you rarely have to put much effort in. What's more lazy, having a girl around to watch a movie and have a pizza then seducing her with a massage? Or getting dressed up, planning a date, then taking her out to a nice restaurant, perhaps out to a movie, dancing or just a night on the town and showing her a great time? I've done both of these things and I can tell you the first one is much less effort. You wouldn't even need to get out of your track pants... not that I've worn track pants since I was 12 except the pair I recently bought strictly for the gym.

    I think I'm going to go to sleep now before I devolve into more aggressive jabs at things that annoy me about society and my past behavior.
     
  4. Recoil

    Recoil Senior member

    Messages:
    1,837
    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    Location:
    Toronto
  5. TUspiv

    TUspiv Senior member

    Messages:
    101
    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2007
    Location:
    Texas, for now
    http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_vi...ml?id=4200790n

    Bob Schieffer from Face the Nation on dating.


    Though he makes generalizations he's not far off at all. I went to Europe last summer and noticed that there were far more couples than there were roaming groups of the same sex. I prefer the Parisian way.
     
  6. montecristo#4

    montecristo#4 Senior member

    Messages:
    12,263
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Location:
    Reagan Country (Massachusetts)
    They said in 1980. And 1960. And 1940. And 1920. I'm sure our hunter-gatherer forefathers shook their heads and grunted in quiet despair at the crazy youngsters with their "Farms" and "Agriculture." 'Thog think humanity doomed. Youth today too lazy to hunt mammoth and bang wife on head.'

    If we listen to the old, humanity has been in a death spiral towards oblivion since day 1. I think we'll get by.


    Said the Mayan wise guy, circa 900 BC.
     
  7. clarity

    clarity Senior member

    Messages:
    556
    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2008
    This whole too busy to date thing is laughable if you ask me. If you ever get told this more than once from a woman you just met, forget her. She probably has just enough going on to make it look like no time is available to avoid you. I find it incredibly difficult to believe that a person would keep themselves so busy that they are unable to spare even 30 minutes out of a week for even a simple casual date.

    If you ever come across somebody really interested in you, they will find the time.
     
  8. feynmix

    feynmix Senior member

    Messages:
    1,414
    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    NYC
    This whole too busy to date thing is laughable if you ask me. If you ever get told this more than once from a woman you just met, forget her. She probably has just enough going on to make it look like no time is available to avoid you. I find it incredibly difficult to believe that a person would keep themselves so busy that they are unable to spare even 30 minutes out of a week for even a simple casual date.

    If you ever come across somebody really interested in you, they will find the time.


    + 1.

    If she is interested in having a conversation with you, she will make the time.
     
  9. celery

    celery Senior member

    Messages:
    2,242
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    Dating is fine.

    If no one will date you, then you're either ugly or boring as all hell. Both of which can be remedied by large amounts of alcohol. Coincidence? I think not.
     
  10. JesseJB

    JesseJB Senior member

    Messages:
    1,353
    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2006
    Location:
    Seattle
    Dating is fine.

    If no one will date you, then you're either ugly or boring as all hell. Both of which can be remedied by large amounts of alcohol. Coincidence? I think not.


    Or you live in Seattle.
     
  11. MetroStyles

    MetroStyles Senior member

    Messages:
    15,831
    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Location:
    New York Shitty
    Dating is fine.

    If no one will date you, then you're either ugly or boring as all hell. Both of which can be remedied by large amounts of alcohol. Coincidence? I think not.


    Well thank God you cleared up this topic for us.
     
  12. snake

    snake Senior member

    Messages:
    5,267
    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2008
    I think some of your ideas are right on point. I disagree with the shallowness and laziness - I do not think that because someone prefers dating multiple people they are shallow - they could be getting to know these people very well. I also don't think it's being lazy - if you are not in the market for an exclusive relationship (i.e. the reason some people aren't is that they don't want a girl to become attached and then heart-broken 4 months later - I used to think this way) it may be because it doesn't suit your life at that time.

    However, I think the rest is spot on. Good post.


    I agree. Everyone is looking for something different.

    Being a college student myself, I think the article is very honest.
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by