• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • The 2024 Styleforum and Epaulet Alpaca Project

    For the third year in a row, we're thrilled to partner with @Epaulet to bring you an exclusive collection of luxurious sweaters, hats, jackets, and blankets in Peruvian Alpaca.

    Details can be found here

    The Styleforum Team.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Dacks and other Canadian shoe brands

TimothyF

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2018
Messages
392
Reaction score
313
I hope this is the right place to ask: just what is Dack's Melloflex / Mellowflex? Is it
  1. A fully Goodyear-welt constructed shoe, but just with more "flexible" components? e.g. soft bendy soles, insole, soft uppers etc. ; OR
  2. A cheaper construction method (such as cemented), which may also happen to achieve more flex?
I hope the answer is #1, but don't really know (and Google did not help much). Basically want to know if this line of shoes is "worthy" of us connoisseurs of quality here on this forum (lol)
 

Jiqea

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2018
Messages
1,580
Reaction score
7,921
It has been awhile since I made a post here, but I wanted to document this pair of early Dacks. I picked them up from a recent graduate of UOttawa, who had thrifted them in near pristine condition, complete with their shoes trees, and then proceeded to wear them through his university years without ever conditioning them. Needless to say they are ruined as far as collector value, but they still retain historical interest. I puttied over the cracks on the left shoe to get a better sense of what they may have once looked like (first image).

They are an extraordinarily rare pair of pre-1948 Dacks Oxfords. 1948 was the year that S.E. Dack sold the firm to the Marston group. By mid-1949 the company had been rebranded with the "Modern" thick script logo. To date this is only the third pair of pre-1948 Dacks shoes that I have seen, and on the first two pairs the sock-liner was not present. This pair retains the sock-liner, giving us our first good look at a pre-1948 version, other than those we can get glimpses of from adverts. I documented the liners I could see in adverts earlier in this thread (see page 97), but this shoe has a previously unseen version. This shoe also has a black, early-logo diamond at the interior ankle. That is consistent with the the other two pairs of pre-1948 Dacks I have seen, although on one of those two pairs, which were clearly from the 20's, the black diamond said "Dacks Toronto" rather than "Dacks Canada". My theory is that pre-1948 the diamond was always black. In 1949 Dacks appears to have had made a small run of red-diamonds with the old logo, which I have only seen on shoes with the modern logo sock-liners and stampings. There were also a few early 50's pairs that had a black diamond with the modern logo. After that all the diamonds are red, with the modern logo.

So how old are they? It is tough to say, but somewhere between 1936 and 1948. The shoe trees are original to the shoes, and they can be more easily dated, as this version with the shorter handle shows up in adverts in 1936. Pre-1936 the handle was about an inch longer, while in the 20's the shoe trees were not painted black, and the handle was about 4.5" high.

Given that the sock-liners say "Toronto", rather than "Canada" makes me think this pair may date to the 30's, but that is only a guess.

I wish I had found this pair before they were abused. They are a 10.5D,; my size (note the totally different Dacks coding which I have not seen before). I only paid $10 for them, and the shoes trees are worth more than that. I will send the shoes out to Brett Viberg in Victoria for dissection to see if we can learn anything else. They were made with hidden welt stitching, and have thin, single soles; therefore no nails at the waist or toe. There is also no stamped marks at the waist on the soles, or any other indication of what "Grade" they were. Mysteries wrapped in an enigma. But glad I found them nonetheless.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1129.jpg
    IMG_1129.jpg
    240 KB · Views: 35
  • IMG_1130.jpg
    IMG_1130.jpg
    151.9 KB · Views: 36
  • IMG_1137.jpg
    IMG_1137.jpg
    287.8 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG_1143.jpg
    IMG_1143.jpg
    238.1 KB · Views: 30
  • IMG_1138.jpg
    IMG_1138.jpg
    172.5 KB · Views: 32
  • IMG_1140.jpg
    IMG_1140.jpg
    341.3 KB · Views: 84
  • IMG_1133.jpg
    IMG_1133.jpg
    412.2 KB · Views: 79
Last edited:

Jiqea

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2018
Messages
1,580
Reaction score
7,921
I hope this is the right place to ask: just what is Dack's Melloflex / Mellowflex? Is it
  1. A fully Goodyear-welt constructed shoe, but just with more "flexible" components? e.g. soft bendy soles, insole, soft uppers etc. ; OR
  2. A cheaper construction method (such as cemented), which may also happen to achieve more flex?
I hope the answer is #1, but don't really know (and Google did not help much). Basically want to know if this line of shoes is "worthy" of us connoisseurs of quality here on this forum (lol)
The Dacks Melloflex line was advertized between 1977 and 1994 as a casual summer shoe. Not many of these shoes survive, and that is OK. They were not dacks best work. Often with a vibrum or gum sole. I dont recall if I have seen Goodyear welted versions. I don't pay much attention to them when they pop up. I think there is a Chukka Mellow-flex. That might be cool.
 
Last edited:

goatamous II

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2020
Messages
717
Reaction score
2,307
Those are incredible and heartbreaking at the same time!
The latter comment in reference to how beat up they became.

Great find though!

PS - as a note, free shipping Tuesdays starts next week if you want to wait to send them out to Victoria (provided you have a Canada Post account)
 

mackbrad

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
130
Reaction score
163
It has been awhile since I made a post here, but I wanted to document this pair of early Dacks. I picked them up from a recent graduate of UOttawa, who had thrifted them in near pristine condition, complete with their shoes trees, and then proceeded to wear them through his university years without ever conditioning them. Needless to say they are ruined as far as collector value, but they still retain historical interest. I puttied over the cracks on the left shoe to get a better sense of what they may have once looked like (first image).

They are an extraordinarily rare pair of pre-1948 Dacks Oxfords. 1948 was the year that S.E. Dack sold the firm to the Marston group. By mid-1949 the company had been rebranded with the "Modern" thick script logo. To date this is only the third pair of pre-1948 Dacks shoes that I have seen, and on the first two pairs the sock-liner was not present. This pair retains the sock-liner, giving us our first good look at a pre-1948 version, other than those we can get glimpses of from adverts. I documented the liners I could see in adverts earlier in this thread (see page 97), but this shoe has a previously unseen version. This shoe also has a black, early-logo diamond at the interior ankle. That is consistent with the the other two pairs of pre-1948 Dacks I have seen, although on one of those two pairs, which were clearly from the 20's, the black diamond said "Dacks Toronto" rather than "Dacks Canada". My theory is that pre-1948 the diamond was always black. In 1949 Dacks appears to have had made a small run of red-diamonds with the old logo, which I have only seen on shoes with the modern logo sock-liners and stampings. There were also a few early 50's pairs that had a black diamond with the modern logo. After that all the diamonds are red, with the modern logo.

So how old are they? It is tough to say, but somewhere between 1936 and 1948. The shoe trees are original to the shoes, and they can be more easily dated, as this version with the shorter handle shows up in adverts in 1936. Pre-1936 the handle was about an inch longer, while in the 20's the shoe trees were not painted black, and the handle was about 4.5" high.

Given that the sock-liners say "Toronto", rather than "Canada" makes me think this pair may date to the 30's, but that is only a guess.

I wish I had found this pair before they were abused. They are a 10.5D,; my size (note the totally different Dacks coding which I have not seen before). I only paid $10 for them, and the shoes trees are worth more than that. I will send the shoes out to Brett Viberg in Victoria for dissection to see if we can learn anything else. They were made with hidden welt stitching, and have thin, single soles; therefore no nails at the waist or toe. There is also no stamped marks at the waist on the soles, or any other indication of what "Grade" they were. Mysteries wrapped in an enigma. But glad I found them nonetheless.
such a cool find.
 

mackbrad

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
130
Reaction score
163
Old pair of Florsheim Cordovan 93605 I found in a box in a thrift store...think they were $20 Cdn.

Not sure if these are Cdn made....they have a rubber toppy on sole now (no suicide heel for me) and metal toe caps.

Pic just after cleaning all the dust and debri from them....

View attachment 2035791
Suicide heels, lol. I've never heard that term before.
 

Phrank

Active Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2019
Messages
44
Reaction score
193
Yes, "suicide heels" were the nail for these type of soles with 88 brass nails and a wooden(?) type sole, be on a smooth flooring and walk, and frequently your heels would slip out from under you. Hence the term, "suicide heels" hahahaha.....cheers!
 

suitforcourt

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2012
Messages
8,379
Reaction score
20,035
Recently thrifted these Florsheim by John McHale in kudu. They fit me so I might keep them.

20231004_074853.jpg
20231004_074858.jpg
20231004_074841.jpg
 

mackbrad

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2020
Messages
130
Reaction score
163
Yes, "suicide heels" were the nail for these type of soles with 88 brass nails and a wooden(?) type sole, be on a smooth flooring and walk, and frequently your heels would slip out from under you. Hence the term, "suicide heels" hahahaha.....cheers!
I get it! I've been victim of the suicide effect several times over the years!
 

Kizen

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2023
Messages
5
Reaction score
8
Two exciting acquisitions, and nowhere to flaunt them but here:
Dack's Camel-hide Derby in my size (8), obviously barely worn, just picked them up off Poshmark, super excited to have a chance to wear them:
20231101_155420-jpg.2060425
20231101_181820.jpg
20231101_155440.jpg
Dack's Zebu-hide U-Wings. Early '60s I think, and probably resoled. Size 9.5, so not my size, but I couldn't just leave them sitting in that thrift shop. Look at them! I'll resell or trade them (happy to obey forum ettiquette on this, just letme know what that works)
20231030_163607 (1).jpg
.
20231030_163112 (1).jpg
20231030_163402 (1).jpg
20231030_163131 (1).jpg
 

Attachments

  • 20231030_163112 (1).jpg
    20231030_163112 (1).jpg
    644.3 KB · Views: 30
  • 20231101_155420.jpg
    20231101_155420.jpg
    358.7 KB · Views: 254
Last edited:

suitforcourt

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2012
Messages
8,379
Reaction score
20,035
Two exciting acquisitions, and nowhere to flaunt them but here:
Dack's Camel-hide Derby in my size (8), obviously barely worn, just picked them up off Poshmark, super excited to have a chance to wear them:
20231101_155420-jpg.2060425
View attachment 2060419 View attachment 2060421 Dack's Zebu-hide U-Wings. Early '60s I think, and probably resoled. Size 9.5, so not my size, but I couldn't just leave them sitting in that thrift shop. Look at them! I'll resell or trade them (happy to obey forum ettiquette on this, just letme know what that works) View attachment 2060417 . View attachment 2060411 View attachment 2060413 View attachment 2060415

What are the widths?
 

Featured Sponsor

Do you coordinate your watch strap with your shoes or belt?

  • Always

  • Sometimes

  • Never

  • I don't pay attention


Results are only viewable after voting.

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
515,516
Messages
10,676,728
Members
227,038
Latest member
kairanderson
Top