And to be fair, it's nowhere near the worst offender I've seen!
It's just one of those things that seems to really bother me; marketing departments making stuff up, when there's literally no reason for them to do so.
For example, Thursday Boots ironically-titled 'Honest Pricing Guarantee', where they claim their $200 Captain boots are the equivalent of boots nearly four times the price. They're not - not even close - but they probably are one of the best options if you've only got $200 to spend on a pair of GYW boots. If Thursday's marketing department can't make hay from having one of the best sub $200 boots on the market, they shouldn't be the marketing department. They've got enough to work with; why make stuff up?
Or Red Wing claiming "the Iron Ranger was originally built for iron miners in the 1930s", when in reality it was designed by Aki Iwasaki of Red Wing Japan in 2009. The Iron Ranger must be one of the best selling GYW boots in the world; again surely that's enough for Red Wing's marketing department to work with, without resorting to making stuff up?
Similarly, White's have got tons of history and heritage for their marketing department to fall back on. Why, of all companies, do they feel inclined to be disingenous about the state of their competitors?
I'm not saying they're big, important lies; but in some ways that bothers me more. If a company can't be honest about something totally inconsequential, when there's literally no pressure for them to lie, what are they like when it does matter? Integrity counts, and my attitude is that if a company doesn't care about being honest with tiny, inconsequential things, why would they care about being honest the rest of the time?
Rant over, and I know it's an absolutely tiny thing, but for some reason it's a real pet peeve of mine. Marketing departments; just make your company look good without making stuff up. It's not that hard!
Having worked for many marketing folks over the years as a copywriter, I suspect part of the problem is that they generally don't have their work scrutinized by any C-level executives. Or if they do, those executives just trust the marketing folks are doing whatever it takes to meet sales goals. The result is a gradual morphing of fact into semi-fact and hyperbole that sounds too good to be true and is usually designed to fit a specific narrative that is created before any research is done.
There are also a lot of terrible copywriters and editors out there, often just freelancers, who opt for the most simplistic option because they either don't bother learning the facts, cannot really communicate the complexity of the facts, or just aren't getting paid enough to care (as a former journalist I like to think I had a good grasp of facts and complexities!). And once copy is written, you'd be surprised how long it's simply recycled, year after year, without very few changes or additional scrutiny.
If I were writing Red Wing's IR copy I'd try to talk to Iwasaki and find out more about the early-1900s boot on which his IR design was based. I find that stuff interesting and it would still tie in with the "heritage" narrative.