- Joined
- Mar 7, 2002
- Messages
- 13,956
- Reaction score
- 10,072
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I say yes. Even with Philly he was crazy good. Always led the league in complete games. He is a throwback and deserves to be honored.
Nope, he a very good player but he has as many wins as Andy Petite. He has 3 20 win seasons, I'd like to see 5 or more. He falls just short IMO.
Nope, he a very good player but he has as many wins as Andy Petite. He has 3 20 win seasons, I'd like to see 5 or more. He falls just short IMO.
I don't understand that. Are you the same type of guy who says A-Rod is the best player in baseball despite the fact he sucks in the post-season?
Number of wins is a ****** measure of pitchers' accomplishpment, especially in this case. Petite spent all but 2,3 seasons of his career with the automatic-95-wins-a-season Yankees (not that the Rockets fared much worse when Petite played for them), while Schilling spent at least half of his career away from the winning environments of early 00s D-backs and Red Sox.
I agree that he's in, and I also agree that he's probably not first ballot. Thats going to be increasingly hard to predict though, when players with better numbers start getting passed over due to steroid scandals and etc. I predict that many second or third ballot hof'ers will get in early instead of "better" players.
/\\ /\\ /\\ /\\
Good point. Pettite did 'roids.