Dismiss Notice

STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Current Quality of Church's Shoes

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by Roger, Jan 24, 2007.

  1. Roger

    Roger Senior member

    Messages:
    1,936
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2005
    Location:
    Vancouver
    How do the current run of Church's shoes stack up against what seems to be our standard for mid-priced English shoes, C&J bench grades? I know that they are often priced pretty high. Shoe for shoe (e.g., wingtip balmoral vs. wingtip balmoral) are they of superior quality (construction and leather) to C&J bench grades? Inferior? Somewhere between C&J bench grades and Handgrades? What about their lasts and styles?

    Just for context, I'm considering a pair of the Church's Glenshee model (Norwegian-toe blucher with rubber sole). The alternative would be the C&J Onslow (very similar in appearance and materials) at about the same price. Of course, the EG Dover would be nicer, but it's more than 3 times the price.
     


  2. norcaltransplant

    norcaltransplant Senior member

    Messages:
    2,421
    Likes Received:
    44
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2003
    Location:
    NYC/Brooklyn
    I'm not completelt familiar with the Gleenshee model, but I can provide a little information about the current Church lineup as compared to Crockett Benchgrade and Handgrade. First of all, Church's are better known than Crockett in the US and subsequently retail for similar prices or slightly higher (around the $500 mark). Following the Prada acquisition, and even before, Church's preferred to make extensive use of cobbler calf or corrected grain in their offerings. This is still true today, though I believe the majority of the current models are full grain calfskin of similar quality to crockett. The second criticism of the brand, has been their use of linen linings. Older models were consistently half linen lined. For Fall 06 and Spring 07, the Madison Ave. Church boutique has replaced the majority of the linen lined shoes with full leather linings.

    Lastly, the company has introduced a "premier" range of shoes with slightly better uppers but similar appearing construction to the Custom Grade models. They retail around 600ish. For that price, Crockett and Jones are clearly superior. The only advantage to the Church brand is their wider distribution which will inevitably lead to sale stock. Ive purchased their shoes for as little as $100 via Ebay, and $150 from sample sales. At those prices, Church's is much sleeker and closer to the British aesthetic than any comparable US made shoe.

    With regards to lasting, the current 100s models favor a lower instep. Toe boxes are similar to the square toe C&J lasts, particularly the 240.
     


  3. Sator

    Sator Senior member

    Messages:
    3,083
    Likes Received:
    29
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    Following the Prada acquisition, and even before, Church's preferred to make extensive use of cobbler calf or corrected grain in their offerings. This is still true today, though I believe the majority of the current models are full grain calfskin of similar quality to crockett.

    When I visited their New York store on Madison Ave the place was full of corrected grain leather shoes selling for exorbitant prices. I ran out horrified.

    You pay the price of an EG and get the quality of Loakes.

    I would be reluctant to pay any more than about $120 for a pair of Church's.
     


  4. ms244

    ms244 Senior member

    Messages:
    798
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    May 25, 2006


  5. montmorency

    montmorency Senior member

    Messages:
    188
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2004
    Royal tweed was a lower line of Church's. I imagine it still is.

    The shoes look like they're made out of corrected grain leather to me.
     


  6. Roger

    Roger Senior member

    Messages:
    1,936
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2005
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Wrt the Royal Tweed shoes, I'd find it hard to be sure about whether or not they're made of corrected-grain leather. It's true that they are quite shiny--and this may be a clue that they are--but it might just indicate a high-shine polishing job. Also, most of the disadvantages of corrected-grain leather disappear with black shoes. Black really doesn't develop a patina the way brown and burgundy do, and it is this inability of brown or burgundy corrected-grain leather to develop the depth and character that full-grain leather does so beautifully that makes it really undesirable in those colors.
     


  7. DocHolliday

    DocHolliday Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    16,118
    Likes Received:
    1,091
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Location:
    Tombstone
    A slightly different take than Roger's: While black doesn't develop the same patina as brown, I find that black shoes made of poor leather often show their pedigree fairly quickly.
     


  8. norcaltransplant

    norcaltransplant Senior member

    Messages:
    2,421
    Likes Received:
    44
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2003
    Location:
    NYC/Brooklyn
    At the risk of a hijack....

    Are these Church's on ebay corrected grain or not and whats the expert opinion on quality?

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...6920&rd=1&rd=1


    Im almost sure the shoes are made from corrected grain. The Royal Tweed line from Church's is on par with many of the Loake offerings I've run across at Charles Tyrwhitt. They are, for the most part, completely forgettable for $100.

    Ive found their full grain models pretty nice, and definitely superior to anything made by Loake. The linen linings make for a lighter shoe that breathes a bit better during the warmer months, though this might be a psychological trick. Here are my two examples from Church's:

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    The monkstrap is from the Brooks Brothers English Made line prior to its replacement by C&J/Alfred Sargent labeled under the Peal Company.

    The leather is easy to polish and the low instep of the last is well suited for my feet.
     


  9. Sator

    Sator Senior member

    Messages:
    3,083
    Likes Received:
    29
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    Those ones are nice. But could they be pre-Prada?

    I don't recall the ones in NY being anywhere near that good.
     


  10. SimonC

    SimonC Senior member

    Messages:
    1,687
    Likes Received:
    343
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2007
    Location:
    London, England
    I think we have a better time of things here in England. The ill-informed can still be over-charged for a pair of corrected grain Church's shoes, but having owned a number of pairs of shoes from both manufacturers, the two can be comparable in quality at the same price, as long as you choose carefully.

    Certainly looking in the Regent Street store last week, they had a good selection of shoes at a reasonable price. And even here C&J can be harder to find.
     


  11. norcaltransplant

    norcaltransplant Senior member

    Messages:
    2,421
    Likes Received:
    44
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2003
    Location:
    NYC/Brooklyn
    The top pair (loafers) were purchased at the To Boot Sample Sale in November. These were definitely after the Prada acqusition. They feature a linen liner but the uppers are quite supple and take on a nice antique finish. The monkstraps are from the Brooks Brothers English made line, feature full leather linings, built on the 73 last, and probably manufactured before the Prada purchase. I've been happy with both shoes. I especially like the fit of hte 73 last.
     


  12. mczewd

    mczewd New Member

    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Following the Prada acquisition, and even before, Church's preferred to make extensive use of cobbler calf or corrected grain in their offerings. This is still true today, though I believe the majority of the current models are full grain calfskin of similar quality to crockett. The second criticism of the brand, has been their use of linen linings. Older models were consistently half linen lined.
    I own two pairs of Church and two pairs of C&J benchgrade. I like both brands, but honestly speaking, I do not see what the beef is with Church shoes. I have the Salisbury loafer (73 last) in chestnut and it is fully lined to the toe. I always get compliments when I wear them. I also have a pair of the Church Redhill suede wingtip oxfords, also fully lined to the toe. It is on a more sleek, tapered last.
     


  13. mr monty

    mr monty Senior member

    Messages:
    6,867
    Likes Received:
    891
    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2002
    Location:
    Naptown (Indianapolis)
    Got these a couple of summers ago (Nordstrom's Rack) and the quality seems to be good.

    [​IMG][/IMG]
     


  14. HKTenor

    HKTenor Senior member

    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    16
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2007
    I have five or six pairs, some pre-Prada and some more recent, and find them generally very solid. That said, I don't like the corrected grain models, and favor the calf or shell. In my experience the best grade models wear very well; I have some 12-year old Graftons which look brand new despite being in heavy rotation for much of that time.

    I wouldn't put them below C&J, although they are a slightly different taste. Quality is definitely not anywhere near EG, but neither is the price. I do think they are better made than Loakes or Cheaney, but perhaps not enough to justify the price premium for some.
     


  15. Niels

    Niels Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 18, 2006
    Location:
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    I have 4 pairs of Church's none pre-prada and the quality is fine compared to the C&J and Alden i own and definitely superior to a pair of Allen Edmonds.
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by