1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

Crockett & Jones Last Sizing (337 vs. 363)

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by liamdye, Mar 1, 2016.

  1. liamdye

    liamdye Member

    Messages:
    11
    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2014
    I purchased a pair of Crockett & Jones Audley shoes (last 337) over the summer. I then followed the purchase up with a pair of the Barrington 2’s (last 363) in the fall. After giving the Audley shoes a fair chance to break in (I wear them about twice a week), they have significantly too much leather around the break leading to a several unfortunate looking breaks. Furthermore, with fairly thick sock I slide around in them, even when they are laced up as tight as possible and despite that C&J put a very thin insole in. This is in contrast to the Barrington’s which are the exact same size (9.5 E) and fit great, have a good looking break, and I have room to lace them even tighter.

    At this point I think I will have to sell the Audley’s and will likely purchase the Londsdale’s (last 337). Is there really such a difference in fit between the two lasts? Would it be advisable to purchase the Audley’s again in a smaller size?

    I am based in London so the Jeremy store is very convenient.
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by