Correct button stance

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by imageWIS, Apr 2, 2005.

  1. imageWIS

    imageWIS Senior member

    Messages:
    20,008
    Likes Received:
    97
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Location:
    New York City / Buenos Aires
    As a point of reference, I used a 3-button jacket as a primer when drawing the 1-button jackets. The second picture (higher button) is based on a jacket whose button is directly where the middle button is on a 3-button jacket, whereas the in the first jacket (lower button) the button is based on my own visual perception as to what looks "˜balanced'.

    Jon.
     


  2. johnnynorman3

    johnnynorman3 Senior member

    Messages:
    2,686
    Likes Received:
    13
    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2004
    I like the first one -- that is still on the higher side of "classic" IMO. Even if the waist of the second coat were raised, the first one would still be more flattering to my body types, as it would probably create a bit more shape to the chest (more 3 dimensional). It would also avoid having the skirt flare too much.

    But, on a more personal note, those are incredible drawings -- the first of which I shall be taking to my tailor.
     


  3. water

    water Senior member

    Messages:
    389
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    So, for example, does the middle button on this jacket look too high? [​IMG]
     


  4. imageWIS

    imageWIS Senior member

    Messages:
    20,008
    Likes Received:
    97
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Location:
    New York City / Buenos Aires
    Here are the jackets side by side with a line drawn at midpoint: [​IMG] Jon.
     


  5. Manton

    Manton RINO Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    41,574
    Likes Received:
    2,814
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2002
    Location:
    In Hiding
    You sure that's the middle button? Looks like the top to me. And it does indeed look too high.
     


  6. imageWIS

    imageWIS Senior member

    Messages:
    20,008
    Likes Received:
    97
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Location:
    New York City / Buenos Aires
    (water @ April 02 2005,14:37) So, for example, does the middle button on this jacket look too high? [​IMG]
    You sure that's the middle button? Looks like the top to me. And it does indeed look too high.
    Yes, it's the middle button; you can see the rolled upper buttonhole on the lapel. I agree that it is too high. Jon.
     


  7. Manton

    Manton RINO Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    41,574
    Likes Received:
    2,814
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2002
    Location:
    In Hiding
    Looking again, yes I see. Way too high. Who made that?
     


  8. Luc-Emmanuel

    Luc-Emmanuel Senior member

    Messages:
    1,586
    Likes Received:
    13
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2005
    Location:
    Paris, France
    [​IMG] Now really Manton, you have to be living in another century... As knowledgeable you may be about coats, wearing a trousers above natural waist in the 21st century is just an abomination, a fashion crime : trousers should lay on the hips, that's really the most comfortable you can wear. Luc
     


  9. Manton

    Manton RINO Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    41,574
    Likes Received:
    2,814
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2002
    Location:
    In Hiding
    It is comfortable only in the sense that it is cooler.  I find that my most comfortable trousers are those that sit just above the natural waist, are about 1" too big in the waistband, and are worn with suspenders.  Granted, they are not ideal in August.  But in moderate to cool to cold weather, they are great.

    I hate trousers that sit at the hips.  They shorten the leg line.  Shirt front shows under the waist button of the coat and above the waistband of the trousers.  They just look "bad."  When I wear belts, I get trousers cut to sit a hair below the natural waist, with a very gentle curve upward in the rear waistband.  In order for them not to slip, they need to fit so precisely that the belt is just a decoration. Cinching is just unpleasant.  These are not so comfortable as suspender-rise trousers, but they are better in hot weather.  And they look damn good.  Hard to make, though.
     


  10. LA Guy

    LA Guy Opposite Santa Staff Member Admin Moderator

    Messages:
    34,551
    Likes Received:
    12,128
    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2002
    Location:
    Moscow, Idaho
    I can't believe I am going to have to agree with Manton here, to some degree. I think that it depends on the cut of the suit. Certainly, on the suits I favour and own, all of which have slim jackets and flat front, slim pants, the pants are menat to be worn on the hips. On "classic" suits, though, pants should sit *just* below the natural waist. I recommend such suits to men who were alive for more than half of the last century, and to fat men in general. For all younger, fitter men, I suggest more modern cut suits.
     


  11. water

    water Senior member

    Messages:
    389
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    It is a three-piece Isaia suit.
     


  12. Luc-Emmanuel

    Luc-Emmanuel Senior member

    Messages:
    1,586
    Likes Received:
    13
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2005
    Location:
    Paris, France
    LAG : yeah, to some degree. If you have a flat stomach, there is no need to wear a high rise pants. Now, you can have a flat stomach at 50 [​IMG] Manton, flat front trousers (of course, I always meant flat front : pleated trousers are not to stay on the hips, it just doesn't look right) don't need a belt either to fall perfectly [​IMG] Ah well, it depends on the cut, and your figure, that's what all this forum is about : point is, I don't think ImageWIS is old enough to wear a high rise pleated trousers with suspenders [​IMG] Luc
     


  13. kolecho

    kolecho Senior member

    Messages:
    3,182
    Likes Received:
    265
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Manton,

    May I ask what you mean by "a very gentle curve upward in the rear waistband"? I am interested to tailor some trousers that sit high but without a belt.

    Would you have any pictures or sketch to shwo what you mean?
     


  14. Manton

    Manton RINO Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    41,574
    Likes Received:
    2,814
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2002
    Location:
    In Hiding
    Sorry, I don't have any pics.  Most belt-trousers are made like this to some degree, however.  By "gentle curve" I mean that the waistband is maybe 1.5" higher in back.  When you're wearing the trousers, you wouldn't even notice.  If you laid them out flat along the creases, it would be readily apparent, however.

    But a curved waistband is not enough.  The trousers also have to have a perfect rise, and be perfectly fitted through the hips.  To make "suspender-less" trousers that fit at (or just below) the waist, don't slip to the hips, and don't feel tight in the waistband, upper thigh or seat is hard to do.  If you find a tailor who can do it, be nice to him.
     


  15. kolecho

    kolecho Senior member

    Messages:
    3,182
    Likes Received:
    265
    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Manton,

    I will keep that design in mind when I order the next pair of pants.

    Back to button stance:
    I can imagine instances where the lowest button and hip pockets might not line up after button point and coat length are determined.

    Is it preferable to line up hip pockets and lowest button?

    What about the height of side vents? I understand that they also reach the same line if hip pockets and button point line up. Where should side vents end if those two don't line up?
     


Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by