- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Messages
- 26,710
- Reaction score
- 9,853
I'm no size queen, but a couple of those look small enough to be children's flatware.
I guess I'm more partial to elongated designs like below.
The Minimal is actually pretty massive. Hard to get a sense of scale from the pic.
I would be shocked if anyone here can differentiate “quality level” among any of these sets, beyond “it’s made from metal, and doesn’t have any burrs or sharp edges”.
Apparently, the points and interior surfaces of the fork tines are telltale. Worse made stuff will not be properly ground/finished, leaving the inside of the tines rough and the points squared off or blunt.
That's a fair point about the spoons on the 24. My problem with the 35 is that it indeed reminds me of mess hall flatware, and I find the neck of the fork and spoons to be inelegant.
Of these, I like the Odeon.
The minimal is the worst to my eye. I have the same objection to the neck as I did in the Pott 35. The roots are too deep, and the knife looks unfinished to me.
The London is fine, but I prefer the forks on the Odeon. The forks on the London are too rounded for me and like the 24 conjure and image of a spork in my mind.
The Minimal is my favorite, but now I’m reading some not so great stuff about David Mellor.