Larry Lean
Senior Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2006
- Messages
- 268
- Reaction score
- 2
Dear Sir,
Despite spending too much time hob-nobbing at my daughter's school I realise that you are in fact the only Teacher with whom I have even the slightest rapport. I hope therefore that you'll accept this question in the spirit in which it is asked -
I'm my usual way not too long ago I described my current style of dress as being like a disgraced Prep School master (or somesuch). Silly nonsense of course, but you & I both know that.
Then you popped up to chat to me on FNB's Styleforum and quickly popped off again before I could pick your brains. Hence my turning up here at your 'home'.
... And so my question is this:
I recall from my schooldays in England in the 60's & 70's a quite self-conscious effort on behalf of the newer masters ('Beaks' as we used to call them) to 'look the part'. A certain kind of suit. Various Tweed jackets. That whole wonderful world of corduroy & flannel. They wanted to 'fit in'. To look like that which they were.
Is this now dead?
The teachers in the UK I now meet all seem keen to dress down and to 'relate' to their tender charges. Is this the same in the U.S.?
I'm guessing yes.
I think we get most of our ideas along these lines from the trail-blazers of relaxed dressing in America... And who's to say that these ideas are wrong? (I'm thinking here not of sartorial standards, but of the good that might be done by school children feeling that their teachers are in some way like them and not 'the enemy'.)
Where do you stand on all this as an educator?
Do you favour 'the common touch' or do you find benefits in keeping the distance between master and novice as you instruct?
No trolling here, just interested in your sartorial take on the art of teaching.
l.
Despite spending too much time hob-nobbing at my daughter's school I realise that you are in fact the only Teacher with whom I have even the slightest rapport. I hope therefore that you'll accept this question in the spirit in which it is asked -
I'm my usual way not too long ago I described my current style of dress as being like a disgraced Prep School master (or somesuch). Silly nonsense of course, but you & I both know that.
Then you popped up to chat to me on FNB's Styleforum and quickly popped off again before I could pick your brains. Hence my turning up here at your 'home'.
... And so my question is this:
I recall from my schooldays in England in the 60's & 70's a quite self-conscious effort on behalf of the newer masters ('Beaks' as we used to call them) to 'look the part'. A certain kind of suit. Various Tweed jackets. That whole wonderful world of corduroy & flannel. They wanted to 'fit in'. To look like that which they were.
Is this now dead?
The teachers in the UK I now meet all seem keen to dress down and to 'relate' to their tender charges. Is this the same in the U.S.?
I'm guessing yes.
I think we get most of our ideas along these lines from the trail-blazers of relaxed dressing in America... And who's to say that these ideas are wrong? (I'm thinking here not of sartorial standards, but of the good that might be done by school children feeling that their teachers are in some way like them and not 'the enemy'.)
Where do you stand on all this as an educator?
Do you favour 'the common touch' or do you find benefits in keeping the distance between master and novice as you instruct?
No trolling here, just interested in your sartorial take on the art of teaching.
l.