1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

Cognitive Dissonance: "Polo = Prole/hiphop/Outlet brand" vs. "Ralph Lauren/RLPL is not"

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by Reevolving, Nov 1, 2011.

  1. unbelragazzo

    unbelragazzo Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    8,355
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    I was in the RL store in DC the other day. There's surely better or as good quality to be had for a lower price if you spend enough time researching and looking hard enough, but there is a LOT of permanent style and great items from the Polo line. If the attempt here is to say that RL has "sold out" and is now equivalent to Boss or D&G, I heartily disagree. Someone buying most of their clothing at RL and coordinating it well would be paying more than they have to, but would be quite well dressed IMHO.
     
  2. MikeDT

    MikeDT Senior member

    Messages:
    4,276
    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Location:
    China, Mongolia and UK
    Problem I think is with the word 'polo', it's a common noun and so it gets used on many things like clothes, cars, sweets, the game with horses, etc. 'Polo' is a frequently used name for clothing in China, which has nothing whatsoever to do with Ralph Lauren. Similar with other common nouns like 'golf', 'rugby', 'soccer', 'fashion' and 'vogue'

    AFAIK 'polo' is a common noun and dictionary word and so is different from an artificially made up word like 'Prorsum', which is a registered trademark of Burberry.

    BTW there is a clothing and fancy goods store near where I live that has the charming title of 'Beverly Hills Polo Club', of course it's nowhere near Beverly Hills or the USA. Although most people round here wouldn't really care because they don't read English, however it looks nice in red neon.

    EDIT:

    I wonder if Giorgio Armani have a similar problem with 'emporio', 'collezioni' and 'exchange', all of which are common nouns(English or Italian) and dictionary words.
     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2011
  3. LA Guy

    LA Guy Opposite Santa Staff Member Admin Moderator

    Messages:
    33,417
    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2002
    Location:
    Moscow, Idaho
    

    That's the beauty though. Yes, it means this, but at the same time, it means the Rhinelander mansion, and the Ralph and Ricky Ranch (yeah, I wear a lot of RRL), and Ralph Lauren's famous stable of cars and horses. The man is a marketing genius. I can also tell you, first hand, that when it comes to advertising, they hold every fucking card. I mean, the entire deck. You get to say yes sir, no sir, either way, sir, I'd like it hard in the butt.
     
  4. Sanguis Mortuum

    Sanguis Mortuum Senior member

    Messages:
    5,059
    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2006
    Location:
    Cambridge, England
    

    'Prorsum' is Latin for 'forwards'...
     
  5. bleachboy

    bleachboy Senior member

    Messages:
    1,800
    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Location:
    Nashville
    I've been here for a while, and I don't recall anybody saying that PRL was junk. I own lots of it, just like a bunch of folks here. I love their dress shirts.

    Also, I'm gonna play the race card.
     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2011
  6. JubeiSpiegel

    JubeiSpiegel Senior member

    Messages:
    5,380
    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Location:
    Sartorial Wasteland
    I use to be a lower class person, and i did find that it was difficult to wipe off the "lower class" sign stamped on my forehead with a PRL handkerchief. Luckily, it came right off with a Hermes handkerchief though... :laugh:
     
    1 person likes this.
  7. MikeDT

    MikeDT Senior member

    Messages:
    4,276
    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Location:
    China, Mongolia and UK
    

    Romanes eunt domus!! :nodding:
     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2011
  8. gladhands

    gladhands Senior member

    Messages:
    2,267
    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Lower. Class. Black. Person.
     
  9. bourbonbasted

    bourbonbasted Senior member

    Messages:
    4,024
    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    

    I'm assuming that is a "FTFY" for Reev's title and OP. They both reek of racism.
     
  10. gladhands

    gladhands Senior member

    Messages:
    2,267
    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    

    That's where I stopped reading.
     
  11. Alcibiades

    Alcibiades Senior member

    Messages:
    3,230
    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2009
    Location:
    New Yawk
    I'll attempt to reply to this post seriously

    The "Ralph Lauren" brand is interesting. Everyone from urban youths (undoubtedly the target of the OP) to Ivy league preppies (RL polos with small horses are still a staple of the college set) to regular middle class folk (khakis, button down shirts or sweaters with polo horse, etc) to New York socialites (Black and Blue Label, RL "collection" items, etc) wear Ralph Lauren, and the brand means something positive to each demographic. Other brands have tried this and failed miserably (Tommy Hilfiger being the biggest example). Yet I also find that there is a lot of backlash to the brand (even on this site occasionally) which is odd when people go wild over stuff like J Crew every season over on SW&D because the brand is so widespread.

    I think the environment of the retail stores has a lot to do with ; the stores have basically remained the same even as RL has branched out, and they set the tone for the entire company. At the same time, even on the high end, the brand isnt seen as a "fashion" brand like Louis Vuitton, Gucci, Tom Ford, or whatever; it lacks fashion forwardness, which is actually a positive for a lot of the buyers of the various lines (you could argue RRL is in a way fashion forward, but not in a runway type of way). On the "low end," the stuff sold at department stores still looks better than comparable items and can be had at reasonable prices.

    Finally, I think RL stuff can be described as "affordable luxury" in all of the different segments he operates in. If you are a kid who wants a nice polo shirt, you can get one for Macy's on sale for $50 bucks. Your Nike shoes or whatever may cost $100 bucks, so the Polo isn't that expensive. If you are a college sorority girl and you want a cable knit sweater, you can get one for $200 bucks or something on sale, and it will be well made; i'm sure some other brand (whatever college girls wear nowadays) could cost a lot more. You can spend money on other stuff. If you are a dude who works in an office in Manhattan, you can buy some really nice brown cordovan wingtips to go with your suits (and maybe jeans) for $400 bucks pre tax on sale. The next level of shoes (Edward Green, Lobb, whatever) cost $1000 or more, All the more money for polo shirts for the weekend, RRL denim, whatever else you need (this basically describes me).

    Honestly it may just come down to the fact that everyone likes and respects Mr Lauren himself and what he claims to represent, and they don't mind associating themselves with the brand regardless of who else is wearing it, particularly given he provides so many types of looks.
     
  12. LA Guy

    LA Guy Opposite Santa Staff Member Admin Moderator

    Messages:
    33,417
    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2002
    Location:
    Moscow, Idaho
    to add to the above, I think that a lot of it has to do with both 1) His uncanny ability to control his brand image, and 2) His ability to produce distinct identities for all of his brands. It's really remarkable. If I knew his method and had is instincts, of course, I'd be a lot richer.
     
  13. esq11

    esq11 New Member

    Messages:
    1
    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2011
    Prior to browsing this forum, I had absolutely no idea that Ralph Lauren had higher end brands. My experience had been limited to the their department store and outlet store presence. I have had a few collared shirts and polos over the years.

    Upon seeing the frenzy here over their recent sale, I have taken a closer look at their offerings and am truly impressed by the Black & Purple Label lines, even the suits in the Polo line. I will almost certainly be going to the local Ralph Lauren store when I am ready to rebuild my shoddy wardrobe.
     
  14. bourbonbasted

    bourbonbasted Senior member

    Messages:
    4,024
    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    

    Welcome to StyleForum.
     
  15. daspianist

    daspianist Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    79
    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    

    This thread has full potentiality for flawless victory. :slayer:

    On topic, then:

    I regard Polo as a genius move by Ralph Lauren. He positioned it as a semi-diffusion line based on the (original) stylistic inspiration for his upper tier clothes, but filled its catalog with numerous design overlaps between Polo (especially for women), and the more prestigious Collection-type labels. No other label does this as successfully and seamlessly as Ralph Lauren (think Prada and Miu Miu, Dolce and Gabbana and the now defunct D&G), and in such a way that it actually creates value for brand. Sure, there are some ugly "Pleb" shoes that Polo makes - but its position has never been about being stylistically impeccable (which Purple Label aspires to), but rather reflects on the Polo brand's take on current trends and styles.

    We could already see Rugby emerging as another successful contender that, while being another diffusion line, enhances the brand value of Ralph Lauren.

    But yeah, those 99 percenters and their passé e-class saloons.
     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2011
  16. Bounder

    Bounder Senior member

    Messages:
    2,247
    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    

    Actual polo players hate Ralph Lauren and would not be caught dead wearing his stuff, most especially not a Big Pony logo shirt at a polo match. Some particularly clueless spectators do wear Big Pony shirts, of course, but it is naff in the extreme.

    The only tasteful way to correctly utilize a Big Pony shirt is to wash your car, and by this I do not mean you should wear it, I mean you should buff the wax with it. Big Pony shirts, and giant logo clothing in general, is brand whoring run amok. Personally, I can't abide even small logos on polo shirts so I always get mine from Charles Tyrwhitt. Kent Wang has logoless shirts, too.


    First, the US POLO ASSN actually is the US Polo Association, the governing body in the U.S. for polo.

    Second, this is why people who actually play polo hate Ralph Lauren. Ralph Lauren has sued U.S. Polo numerous times over the last several decades in an effort to protect his exclusive right to use the word polo -- and any image or word even vaguely connected with polo -- on, well, anything. Ralph has won a few and lost a few. The ones he lost gave rise to the US POLO ASSN shirts that you dislike. The irony being, of course, that in a sense, the US Polo Association shirts are real and it is the Ralph Lauren shirts that are fake.
     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2011
  17. jrd617

    jrd617 Senior member

    Messages:
    14,544
    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    


    Weird descriptions of the lines. :puzzled: :puzzled: :puzzled: :puzzled:

    From the man himself:

     
  18. Saturdays

    Saturdays Senior member

    Messages:
    2,612
    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2011
    

    Congrats!



    Hmm Nacho seems to like Ralph stuff lol..

    And yes I know US POLO ASSN is the governing body of the sport in US. However they did not start making clothing until 1981, where as Ralph Lauren started his company in 1967 and shortly after the iconic Polo shirts were being sold. Its a strong word to use 'fake' since Ralph Lauren was the first designer to bring the 'Big Pony' / 'Big Logo' style on a Polo shirt, and after he did - then US POLO ASSN just rode the tailwind - that being said US POLO ASSN doesn't even make the clothing themselves, a third party company Jordache does. So of course Ralph Lauren would sue because they started making clothing after Ralph Lauren did, rode upon their success by making very similar clothing.
     
  19. Saturdays

    Saturdays Senior member

    Messages:
    2,612
    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2011
    

    Yeah I see what he means, I don't think I said anything contrary - just combine what he said and what I said and I think it makes sense. He is talking about the clothing, I am talking about the market. Polo Ralph Lauren is still a heritage/icon line - and definitely preppy - but its built upon the culture around a sport. That is why we have started seeing more emphasis in marketing upon how the polos are a uniform for polo players.

    I guess I was being very frank with that. I stand behind what I say about Purple and Black Label - but I don't disagree with Ralph.
     
  20. GoldenTribe

    GoldenTribe Senior member

    Messages:
    3,670
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2010
    

    So SS12 is the end. News to me.

    As for the idiotic topic at hand, one of the busiest threads in MC is POLO RL Private Sale 10/27, which ought to put to bed any Reetarded notion that SF dismisses it outright as a "prole/hiphop/outlet brand."
     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2011

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by