• Hi, I'm the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear and fashion.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

China could grab up to 80 percent of the u.s. clot

Millerp

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
615
Reaction score
14
Need subscription to view so here is cut and paste.

We've seen this coming haven't we?
********************************

China Could Rule Textile Market After 2005
Study Sees Impending Industry Shake-Up

By Paul Blustein
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, August 12, 2004; Page E01

China is poised to dominate the more than $400 billion global market in clothing, and India will also significantly increase its clothing exports starting in 2005, when import restrictions are eliminated in the United States and other rich nations, according to a World Trade Organization study released yesterday.

But the report said that while many developing countries will suffer significant losses amid stiff new competition from China and India, a number of nations such as Mexico and Turkey should be able to maintain their positions as major clothing exporters because they are geographically close to the big markets of the United States and the European Union.

The WTO report is the latest in a series of warnings that tumultuous transformation is set to begin next year in the world textile and apparel industry, a crucially important sector because it is historically the first rung on the ladder of industrialization for developing countries.

The system that has governed most international trade in the sector for more than three decades is set to expire on Jan. 1 under a WTO agreement struck in 1995. The old system has allowed rich nations -- chiefly the United States, Canada and the E.U. -- to set quotas, or ceilings, on the amount of textiles and apparel that they import from individual countries. That has allowed them to protect their domestic firms and workers from low-wage competition to some extent, although the rising tide of cheap clothing already has destroyed much of the U.S. industry.

Once the quotas are eliminated, the lowest-cost and most efficient producers will be free to export as much as they want, and many experts have predicted that China will emerge as the biggest winner by far.

Some U.S. executives have publicly forecast that China could grab up to 80 percent of the U.S. clothing market. Earlier this year, the U.S. International Trade Commission, an independent agency, released a report based in large part on interviews with industry sources around the world. That report said China is "expected to become the 'supplier of choice' for most U.S. importers . . . because of its ability to make almost any type of textile and apparel product at any quality level at a competitive price."

That prospect has fueled mounting protest from U.S. textile and apparel firms, as well as from companies in some developing countries that once favored scrapping the quotas but are now having second thoughts. The U.S. industry has mobilized an effort to extend the quotas until 2008, and in recent weeks Mauritius, Nepal and Bangladesh have urged the WTO to hold an emergency meeting to consider an extension. The move was strongly opposed, however, by China, India and Pakistan, among others, and doesn't appear likely to succeed.

The issue has become a source of some discomfort for the Bush administration because of the textile industry's political clout in southeastern states, including North Carolina, the home state of Sen. John Edwards, the Democratic vice presidential candidate.

Richard Mills, the spokesman for U.S. Trade Representative Robert B. Zoellick, reiterated the administration's position yesterday that the United States isn't backing the effort to extend the quota system. "The United States will abide by its international obligations negotiated more than a decade ago," Mills said.

Mills emphasized that the administration has come to the U.S. industry's aid. In particular, it has taken advantage of a special provision in the agreement admitting China to the WTO that allows Washington to cap Chinese textile and apparel imports until 2008 in sectors where those imports are surging. That provision is expected to keep Beijing from wiping out its competitors over the next several years, and it was invoked late last year to limit Chinese shipments of brassieres, dressing gowns and knit fabric to the United States.

Using calculations based mainly on cost and efficiency, yesterday's WTO staff report forecast that China's and India's exports will increase dramatically after 2005. In the U.S. clothing market, China's share could shoot up to 50 percent from 16 percent in 2002, and India's share will surge to 15 percent from 4 percent. Mexico's share, meanwhile, would drop to 3 percent, from 12 percent.

In the E.U. clothing market, China's share will rise to 29 percent from 20 percent, and India's will rise to 9 percent from 5 percent, while Turkey's will fall to 6 percent from 10 percent.

But the model used to make those projections doesn't take into account the advantages enjoyed by producers with geographical proximity to the markets they serve, the report said.

"Time to market is important and increasingly so, particularly in the fashion clothing sector," the report said. "Therefore, countries close to the major markets are likely to be less affected by competition from India and China than has been anticipated in previous studies."

Those suppliers include Mexico and the nations of the Caribbean, Eastern Europe and North Africa, which are "likely to remain important exporters to the U.S. and E.U. respectively, and possibly maintain their market shares," the report said. "This is even more likely given the preferential access they have to the markets through regional trade agreements," such as NAFTA.

The countries that are most likely to lose "are those located far from the major markets," the report said. Other losers will include the high-cost local producers in the United States, E.U. and Canada.
 

johnnynorman3

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2004
Messages
2,700
Reaction score
18
Unless this newspaper article is including Hong Kong as part of China, the prediction is clearly wrong. The trend I see from my musings on this board is that Jantzen Tailor will probably have a 90% market share in shirting by early 2005.
 

imageWIS

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 19, 2004
Messages
20,007
Reaction score
103
Unless this newspaper article is including Hong Kong as part of China, the prediction is clearly wrong. The trend I see from my musings on this board is that Jantzen Tailor will probably have a 90% market share in shirting by early 2005.
hahahaha, HaHaHaHa, HAHAHAHAHA.

Oh, man that's priceless.

Jon.
 

rws

Active Member
Joined
May 30, 2004
Messages
40
Reaction score
1
Some U.S. executives have publicly forecast that China could grab up to 80 percent of the U.S. clothing market. Earlier this year, the U.S. International Trade Commission, an independent agency, released a report based in large part on interviews with industry sources around the world. That report said China is "expected to become the 'supplier of choice' for most U.S. importers . . . because of its ability to make almost any type of textile and apparel product at any quality level at a competitive price."
This seems almost incredible.  Neither in the States, nor in Europe, nor in China have I seen very good -- let alone excellent -- Chinese cloth, not even in silks. And modern Chinese workmanship is generally mediocre or worse, much worse.  It's difficult to believe, then, that fine clothing would be made of Chinese cloth or in China.

But Italy lacked any decent woollen textiles until the Fascists took power:  Mussolini, true to his autarkic principles, all but forced the development of better-quality woollen mills.  And now we see Zegna and others.  Will China be the next Italy in this?
 

LabelKing

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
May 24, 2002
Messages
25,743
Reaction score
254
Originally Posted by Millerp,12 Aug. 2004, 09:07
Some U.S. executives have publicly forecast that China could grab up to 80 percent of the U.S. clothing market. Earlier this year, the U.S. International Trade Commission, an independent agency, released a report based in large part on interviews with industry sources around the world. That report said China is "expected to become the 'supplier of choice' for most U.S. importers . . . because of its ability to make almost any type of textile and apparel product at any quality level at a competitive price."
This seems almost incredible. Â Neither in the States, nor in Europe, nor in China have I seen very good -- let alone excellent -- Chinese cloth, not even in silks. Â And modern Chinese workmanship is generally mediocre or worse, much worse. Â It's difficult to believe, then, that fine clothing would be made of Chinese cloth or in China. But Italy lacked any decent woollen textiles until the Fascists took power: Â Mussolini, true to his autarkic principles, all but forced the development of better-quality woollen mills. Â And now we see Zegna and others. Â Will China be the next Italy in this?
China's economic policy focuses on a certain type of laissez-faire termed "market economy" introudced in the 80's by Deng XiaoPing. Essentially it is capitalism but the politcial system is still of a Communist nature. However one has to realize the extent of corruption rife in the regime. Which lends a certain quality factor virtually impossible. For example large companies have used whitening chemcials in baby food, and various poisonous substances in medecine. Already the regime cannot pay back their debts to South Korea, and so S.Korea has pulled some of its investments out. The entire country's economy is dependent on foreign intervention at this point. The only Chinese luxury brand is Shanghai Tang which is based in Hong Kong. English mills are still very good.
 

LA Guy

Opposite Santa
Admin
Moderator
Joined
Mar 8, 2002
Messages
49,237
Reaction score
24,863

johnnynorman3

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2004
Messages
2,700
Reaction score
18
I agree that "Chinese" has a range to it. The stuff that comes out of Hong Kong for example -- everything from Banana premium shirts to RL Black Label for women -- is pretty high quality stuff at the high end. Certainly not that much further from Italian made stuff, IMO.
 

VMan

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2003
Messages
5,105
Reaction score
30
I agree that "Chinese" has a range to it.  The stuff that comes out of Hong Kong for example -- everything from Banana premium shirts to RL Black Label for women -- is pretty high quality stuff at the high end.  Certainly not that much further from Italian made stuff, IMO.
I agree with this. Just look at all the higher-end stuff (not high end as we see it, but high-end as the other 99% of the population sees it) that is made in HK - Joseph Abboud, Armani Collezioni shirts, Ralph Lauren, J Crew, etc.
 

j

(stands for Jerk)
Admin
Spamminator Moderator
Joined
Feb 17, 2002
Messages
14,912
Reaction score
101
True but how much of the textiles originate in China? I have a hard time believing that much of the cloth even gets made there for the higher end stuff. Just look at Jantzen- Italian cotton, Japanese cotton, etc.

Then again, it's not like it matters that much where the cloth comes from.
 

faustian bargain

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2004
Messages
2,523
Reaction score
2
another article on the same topic has appeared in the WSJ, front page section B: "Making Labels for Less". it goes in depth about the new 'supply chain city' apparel production model.

china leads the market share for exporters of apparel to the US (for the year ending may 2004) with 13.1%; mexico is second with 10.2%

interestingly hong kong is still split out from china in their list, it comes 6th place at 4.1%. so if you combine the two you get a hefty 17.2%.

(source of the table was US Census Bureau via International Development Systems)


/andrew
 

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by

Featured Sponsor

Favorite knitwear under jackets/sport coats

  • Crewneck sweater

  • Turtleneck sweater

  • Long-sleeve polo

  • Vest

  • I don't like knitwear worn with jackets/sport coats


Results are only viewable after voting.

Related Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
454,751
Messages
9,850,801
Members
205,457
Latest member
demonica59
Top