• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

TheFoo

THE FOO
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
26,710
Reaction score
9,853
There have been really terrible Mustangs in the past. This isn't desecrating anything.

Damn. Got me again. Making a ****** version of the Mustang is the same thing as turning it into a completely different genre of car. Because, you know, nobody else was making ****** versions of their cars in the 70’s.
 

otc

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
24,516
Reaction score
19,163
I'm sure I am biased because these were the cars that looked "old" (but not "vintage") when I was starting to notice cars...but I have always thought these late 80's mustangs were ugly as ****:

1282466

1282469


4th gen were pretty ugly too (although the 1999 facelift was a big improvement).

5th generation looked pretty good and the 6th gen both looks good AND seems like a pretty good car in my experience.
 

A Y

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Messages
6,082
Reaction score
1,038
Damn. Got me again. Making a ****** version of the Mustang is the same thing as turning it into a completely different genre of car. Because, you know, nobody else was making ****** versions of their cars in the 70’s.

1. Not everything is about you except maybe ricey 911s.
2. I'm not sure what other people making terrible cars in the 70s has to do with keeping the Mustang name to one genre of car.
 

Texasmade

Stylish Dinosaur
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
28,560
Reaction score
37,546
There have been really terrible Mustangs in the past. This isn't desecrating anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: A Y

jbarwick

Distinguished Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2012
Messages
8,719
Reaction score
9,670
My parents had a Mustang growing up. It was parked on our slight incline driveway and when I was <5 playing in it, I released the emergency brake and roll backward into our neighbors fence. That's one of the few things I can remember from when I was that young.
 

Dino944

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2011
Messages
7,730
Reaction score
8,740
I'm sure I am biased because these were the cars that looked "old" (but not "vintage") when I was starting to notice cars...but I have always thought these late 80's mustangs were ugly as ****:

View attachment 1282466
View attachment 1282469

4th gen were pretty ugly too (although the 1999 facelift was a big improvement).

5th generation looked pretty good and the 6th gen both looks good AND seems like a pretty good car in my experience.

Compared to the Mustang's of the late 70's when I was a kid...those 80's Mustangs really aren't that bad. Look at these abominations ...

1282543


1282541


1282538


1282540
 

otc

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Messages
24,516
Reaction score
19,163
I dunno. #2 is an abomination and the paint on #4 is...not my style...but I think those are better looking than the 80s models. Paint the hood on #4 black and it looks alright.

I'd say it was just that I don't like the 80s at all based on them being the cars that looked old when I was a teen (born in 1986)...but stuff like the M3 or Audi Quattro still look pretty good to me, so maybe it is just 80s america that I hate.
 

Dino944

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2011
Messages
7,730
Reaction score
8,740
I dunno. #2 is an abomination and the paint on #4 is...not my style...but I think those are better looking than the 80s models. Paint the hood on #4 black and it looks alright.

I'd say it was just that I don't like the 80s at all based on them being the cars that looked old when I was a teen (born in 1986)...but stuff like the M3 or Audi Quattro still look pretty good to me, so maybe it is just 80s america that I hate.

Well, we will just have to agree to disagree...I hated the late 70's Mustangs...I think those are the worst looking Mustangs of all time. The 80's ones are far from perfect...but in my eyes they were a big improvement.
 

Omega Male

Stylish Dinosaur
Supporting Member
Joined
May 30, 2013
Messages
16,876
Reaction score
38,598
Now Firebirds were legit. My wife had a Trans Am (not this one, photo for representative purposes only) as a teenager in St. Louis in the late 80s and it's a miracle she survived.

1282622
 

nootje

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
5,581
Reaction score
5,281
Meh, if jaguar can call the i-pace an suv I’m fine with ford calling this a mustang.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 85 37.4%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 87 38.3%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 24 10.6%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 35 15.4%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 15.9%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,461
Messages
10,589,505
Members
224,251
Latest member
sightcareformula
Top