otc
Stylish Dinosaur
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2008
- Messages
- 24,533
- Reaction score
- 19,187
OK, I read the study so you don't have to. The mean estimated cost of the yielding cars was $6K (N = 129, SD = 4.7) and the mean estimated cost of the non-yielding cars was $8K (N = 332, SD = 6.5). I feel like this tells us more about the neighborhood observed than the putative behavior of Porsche etc. drivers?
There have been a lot of previous studies on the topic that go into this...I'd say that mean estimated cost is a weird way of looking at it if you aren't controlling for depreciation and type. Is a contractor driving a $50k truck more likely to be a douche than someone driving a 3 year old M3?
The first notable study on this (that the paper cites) had people code the cars into 5 different "vehicle status" buckets based on make, age, and appearance. So a beat to **** '98 mercedes would still end up in low status, and a fully-loaded brand new chrystler pacifica wouldn't end up in the top status despite costing more than a 330i.
The study itself doesn't call out specific makes, but one of the authors is quoted as saying "BMW drivers were the worst"