Cars We Drive!

[Hampton]

3 days of driving the Cayenne S, fuel total of = $250.

Still love the car

 

[poorsod]



Passed by this while walking to my apartment for lunch:

Want.

I keep flip flopping on the idea of having a sensible daily driver and then an impractical but sporty weekend/track car vs the "do it all" car that is both fast and agile as well as luxurious and practical.

What say you all?

I thought you already had your answer.

 

[Superfluous]

Recently got this big baby.

BMW 640

 

[jet]

I like the one car gt do it all concept, the abuse is frustrating unless you have a true collector car. Cars are meant to be driven and I'm sticking with it unless we're talking gt3 concept which I would still drive the **** out of just not every day.

Think I might pick up a 6 gran coupe next year and to be honest I think the sport body kit looks better than the M6GC (though I prefer the engine obviously).

 

[JayJay]



I like the one car gt do it all concept, the abuse is frustrating unless you have a true collector car. Cars are meant to be driven and I'm sticking with it unless we're talking gt3 concept which I would still drive the **** out of just not every day.

Think I might pick up a 6 gran coupe next year and to be honest I think the sport body kit looks better than the M6GC (though I prefer the engine obviously).

We're in agreement on this. I believe in driving my cars anywhere and everywhere possible. I like luxury and high performance so a car that fits both criteria works well for me.

 

[impolyt_one]

I just don't like the idea of putting junk miles on a good car - not the service requirements or anything, just that I don't like too much wear and tear for such unimportant drives. The 6GC is beautiful, best BMW made in the past decade. I actually prefer the standard non-M sport kit on that car as the venting on the front bumper is lower visually, and the rear M-sport bumper is rather ugly IMO. I feel like the M-sport kit isn't detailed enough for bodywork that is quite intricate - the standard bumpers are just the right balance.

 

[HRoi]

drove the F-type S and V8 yesterday. V8 will most likely be the next car unless I can swing a used bull.

my top 3 most beautiful cars sold today, non exotic, are:
F type
6GC
RS5

 

[Hampton]

Love it. I had the 745 and wanted to change to a 645 or a 650. But changed my mind and went for a SUV.

What year is this?

Recently got this big baby.

BMW 640

 

[gort]

Anxious to see what car maker is the first to release the IOS integration. Will be in the market for a new car by then.

 

[Find Finn]



I just don't like the idea of putting junk miles on a good car - not the service requirements or anything, just that I don't like too much wear and tear for such unimportant drives. The 6GC is beautiful, best BMW made in the past decade. I actually prefer the standard non-M sport kit on that car as the venting on the front bumper is lower visually, and the rear M-sport bumper is rather ugly IMO. I feel like the M-sport kit isn't detailed enough for bodywork that is quite intricate - the standard bumpers are just the right balance.

I doubt the regular 6 or GC will be collectible, so I wouldn't care to be honest and BMW has a good residual value, so....

I'm the exact opposite, I find the stock bumpers bland and not aggressive enough.

Recently got this big baby.

Beautiful.

What color?

 

[Piobaire]

The "one vehicle does it all" is why I'll probably never get out of an SUV.

 

[gomestar]



unless I can swing a used bull.

?:

 

[Hampton]

.

 

[jet]

hampton is the new green frog

don't think we need more pics of a base cayenne bro but congrats

re: the mileage thing, they're not junk miles if you've enjoyed driving them

gc is one of the few cars bmw makes that looks good in both stock and m trim, i'd be content with this but not the color and shadowline

 

[Find Finn]

I wish I could live with champagne leather.