Alexander Kabbaz
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 1,276
- Reaction score
- 12
Isn't the dreck to which you referred which is no good for making sh.tkickers?(JCusey) the fabric in the splice with the fabric in the shirt
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Isn't the dreck to which you referred which is no good for making sh.tkickers?(JCusey) the fabric in the splice with the fabric in the shirt
Originally Posted by Alexander Kabbaz,Feb. 26 2005,17:44(linux_pro @ Feb. 26 2005,23:42)
Quote:
Only once in my entire career has a RTW manufacturer come to me and said, "Take my shirt apart and tell me how to make it the best it can be. Cost is not important". I was so shocked, I forgot to send a consulting bill. That manufacturer was Carlo Franco.
Yeah, he told me about that on the phone. Â I think it was really quite exemplary of you to help someone like that, even though he is selling a product in your same market. Â Obviously, the existence of his shirts will not diminish your market at all, but still it was a very nice thing for you to do. As for Chuck's (www.carlofranco.com) shirts, I can honestly say now that you would have a hard time finding a better RTW shirt on the market, and I've owned many brands. Â The shirts are worth greatly more than the $119 asking price. Â My Facconable shirts cost $125, the Zegnas are $250, and I own a few that I paid a bit more. Â The Carlo Franco shirt "feels" higher quality than most of them (I have a Facconable that is a personal favorite). One thing that really jumped out at me with his shirts was the fabric. Â I always thought Egyptian Cotton was the cheapo stuff. Â The fabric in these shirts doesn't feel cheap, and definitely does not look cheap at all. Â It has a very silky, smooth sort of feel (and has a slight "shimmer" to it), and is very breathable, which I like. I have to comment again how well-fitting his shirts are. Â Like most on this board, I LOATHE tent shirts (Ike Behar has some real tents out there in this price range). Â The Carlo Franco shirt fits me extremely well, almost like an MTM. Â There is no excess fabric at the sides at all when I tuck it in. Â I will have to post a picture. I think I've said it all before though. Â Once again, if you don't already have one of these shirts, get one. Â They are worth much more than the asking price, IMHO.
Contemplating getting some new shirts and this discussion as well as others like it has been enough to draw a long time lurker out. Hello all. Pleasantries aside, now down to business. How did the shirt wash? Â Any shrinkage? Â Way too many shirts shrink when washed so this is important. Of course pre shrunk cottons wont or shouldnt shrink with additional washes, are these pre shrunk? You didnt answer the question above about the hand detailing as well as the stitches per inch on the machine seams assuming that there are machine seams although if Drizzt3117 can compare these to Borelli, Kiton, Barba et al. (really?) I imagine that there are no machine seams but see my next question. I assume that the shirt is all single needle tailoring although on the site it says double track stitch seams. What does that mean? Â Do you know the difference? Pardon this question if it sounds snotty, but how much experience do you have with shirts if you thought that Egyptian cotton is the cheap stuff? Â Especially in light of the fact that on the Carlo Franco Site he says he uses the best materials available and then proceeds to list Egyptian Cotton. (and by the way, which cotton do you have thats not breathable? Â Anything with an "ester" at the end is artificial) Finally and this is probably what brought me out of lurksville:If (obviously) the existence of CF shirts will not diminish Mr. Kabbaz's market then Carlo Franco is not selling a product in Mr. Kabbaz's same market. Â Right? And although he didnt say it, Â I suspect Mr. Kabbaz's is glad you approve of his behaviour.I think it was really quite exemplary of you to help someone like that, even though he is selling a product in your same market. Â Obviously, the existence of his shirts will not diminish your market at all,
I'm waiting for him to make 17x36 as well.I asked Chuck once, and hopefully will remember to ask again this coming wknd, but does he do 17/17.5/36?
When I asked last he didn't...
In the first place, the only footwear that I kick sh.t in was purchased expressly for the purpose. In the second place, I can't think of any footwear less suited to the purpose than that made from voile or 2x2 200s. In the third place, what else are you going to use to splice the sleeves? Why would you waste good leather?Isn't the dreck to which you referred which is no good for making sh.tkickers?
(StewF18 Joined February 2005 Posted on Feb. 27 2005,11:45 )Contemplating getting some new shirts and this discussion as well as others like it has been enough to draw a long time lurker out.
None of the good high-count Italian cottons are pre-shrunk. Pre-shrunk is a marketing gimiick which means that a certain amount of the potential shrinkage, not all of it, has been removed. I'm sitting here right now in my pre-shrunk Levi's ... trying to fasten the button. Damnned cinnamon scones ... If your high-quality non-bespoke shirt claims to be pre-shrunk ... caveat emptor.Way too many shirts shrink when washed so this is important. Of course pre shrunk cottons wont or shouldnt shrink with additional washes, are these pre shrunk?
As far as I know, it means Texans don't speak very good English (sorry, Cusey). The Carlo Franco shirt I examined had double-needle stitched side-seams. Changing this was one of my ideas for improving an already value-filled product. I have not seen a more recent run and you therefore must await Chuck's return on this aspect.double track stitch seams. What does that mean?
Common mis-statement, probably also deriving from the lack of language facility in the Tumbleweed State. ALL of the finest cotton is grown in Egypt ... except for some of the Sea Island. It is then woven either in Switzerland or Italy. No concessions here - only Swiss or Italian. Not the 160's from Japan or China. Not the "180's" from Century in India. They're comin' along but haven't made it yet. The only thing I am certain of about Carlo Franco fabric is that it is woven in one of Italy's better mills of Egyptian-grown ELS cotton. Disecting the fabric was not my goal when disecting the shirt.Pardon this question if it sounds snotty, but how much experience do you have with shirts if you thought that Egyptian cotton is the cheap stuff?
So much in two sentences. What do you mean by hand detailing? If you like the appearance of a hand-made buttonhole, the CF shirt does not use them. If you are referrring to the advertising gimmicks of mass-producing the hand-attachment certain parts of the shirt, they are nothing more than gimmicks, a fact which many forum members have come to realize by now. You reference comparison to Borelli, Kiton, Barba, et. al. If you are implying that those brands have no machine stitching I believe that you are incorrect.You didnt answer the question above about the hand detailing as well as the stitches per inch on the machine seams assuming that there are machine seams although if Drizzt3117 can compare these to Borelli, Kiton, Barba et al. (really?) I imagine that there are no machine seams but see my next question.
I am puzzled as to what relevance this has to the quality of a Carlo Franco shirt.And although he didnt say it, I suspect Mr. Kabbaz's is glad you approve of his behaviour.
Perhaps, but one can only afford someone so much patience...PHV - Much as I agree with (almost) everything you said, would you be so magnanimous as to allow me to point out that, in certain quarters, only four of your words are going to be seen?
(StewF18 Joined February 2005 Posted on Feb. 27 2005,11:45 )Contemplating getting some new shirts and this discussion as well as others like it has been enough to draw a long time lurker out.Quote:
None of the good high-count Italian cottons are pre-shrunk. Pre-shrunk is a marketing gimiick which means that a certain amount of the potential shrinkage, not all of it, has been removed. I'm sitting here right now in my pre-shrunk Levi's ... trying to fasten the button. Damnned cinnamon scones ... If your high-quality non-bespoke shirt claims to be pre-shrunk ... caveat emptor.Way too many shirts shrink when washed so this is important. Of course pre shrunk cottons wont or shouldnt shrink with additional washes, are these pre shrunk?
As far as I know, it means Texans don't speak very good English (sorry, Cusey). The Carlo Franco shirt I examined had double-needle stitched side-seams. Changing this was one of my ideas for improving an already value-filled product. I have not seen a more recent run and you therefore must await Chuck's return on this aspect.double track stitch seams. What does that mean?
Common mis-statement, probably also deriving from the lack of language facility in the Tumbleweed State. ALL of the finest cotton is grown in Egypt ... except for some of the Sea Island. It is then woven either in Switzerland or Italy. No concessions here - only Swiss or Italian. Not the 160's from Japan or China. Not the "180's" from Century in India. They're comin' along but haven't made it yet. The only thing I am certain of about Carlo Franco fabric is that it is woven in one of Italy's better mills of Egyptian-grown ELS cotton. Disecting the fabric was not my goal when disecting the shirt.Pardon this question if it sounds snotty, but how much experience do you have with shirts if you thought that Egyptian cotton is the cheap stuff?
So much in two sentences. What do you mean by hand detailing? If you like the appearance of a hand-made buttonhole, the CF shirt does not use them. If you are referrring to the advertising gimmicks of mass-producing the hand-attachment certain parts of the shirt, they are nothing more than gimmicks, a fact which many forum members have come to realize by now. You reference comparison to Borelli, Kiton, Barba, et. al. If you are implying that those brands have no machine stitching I believe that you are incorrect. Finally, the CF shirt I inspected was a very large herringbone with very long floats and an extraordinarily high sheen. Even bespoke, I question whether any competant maker would exceed 17-18 stitches on this type of fabric without chancing total destruction. The CF shirt came in at 16 which is perfectly appropriate.You didnt answer the question above about the hand detailing as well as the stitches per inch on the machine seams assuming that there are machine seams although if Drizzt3117 can compare these to Borelli, Kiton, Barba et al. (really?) I imagine that there are no machine seams but see my next question.
I am puzzled as to what relevance this has to the quality of a Carlo Franco shirt.And although he didnt say it, Â I suspect Mr. Kabbaz's is glad you approve of his behaviour.
Unnecessary apology, IMHO. I, for one, took your clearly written opinion at face value and was in no way lead to believe that you were proclaiming Carlo Franco to be the Holy Grail. Never mind what Chuck claims for himself.(linux_pro) I apologize if I had led anyone to believe anything else, and for my lack of in-depth knowledge on dress shirts and how they are made, but if you think that somehow affects my ability to tell how well a shirt fits me and feels, maybe you should just spare yourself the time of reading this, and buy one to try it yourself.
Oh yeah? Try to reach him before next Wednesday.Oh, and the customer service Chuck offers is worth another 40 bucks he doesn't charge.