STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
he speaks the common man's language. the grant peterson of cameras. highly polarizing, but makes sense on some levels. i obsess over comparing moire patterns on a 100% crop studio shot, but that is a pursuit for its own sake, and does not matter much in the real world.
Any M 4/3 or a Sony Nex would be good. pretty simple to use even without knowledge of cameras and it'll fit into blazer pockets
Those look pretty enormous for P&S cameras. That thing couldn't fit in my pocket, could it?
The Sony NEX system has nice camera bodies, but the lenses are gargantuan. Having huge lenses on a small body sort of negates the weight/bulk benefit of a compact camera.
The Olympus Micro 4/3 are a better option in my book.
The Panasonic LX5 is also a great pocket camera.
i was thinking this before, but I've since reversed my opinion for several reasons. the NEX system uses an APC-S sensor which is larger than a four thirds sensor. The NEX system did initially suffer from having such a small selection of lenses but it helps prevent lens hording which is generally a pitfall of going for interchangeable systems. And now the release of the Carl Zeiss 1.8/24 for the NEX makes it quite a nice option and great travel focal length
I'd say the larger sensor benefits kick in at high ISO / low-light settings.
Fixed the thread title. Now I'm looking at the Canon S95 vs. the S100. Any opinions? Or other suggestions in the same class?
if it's above 300 then i'd say throw the extra for the s100
Why?