DrapeCut
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2016
- Messages
- 88
- Reaction score
- 50
Hi, all!
Some time ago, I posted a thread bemoaning the brannock device's uselessness for determining my actual shoe size.
I always measured a 9.5d on the right foot with the same arch and overall foot lengths and a 10d on the left with a 9.5 arch length. However, very rarely did a 9.5d pair of lace shoes or loafers ever really fit. My longer left foot would always have some heel slippage and annoying gaps on the outward facing part of my ankle. The shorter right foot usually never had heel slippage and my ball joint were always at the shoes' widest points for both feet. Even though the balls of my feet would fill out the width of any 9.5d shoes, I'd have to pull laces on oxfords very tight with almost no gap room (for breaking in) to get a snug fit around my arches. Loafers almost never fit well in 9.5d
Even though my ball joints nearly always lined up with the shoe's flex point, I determined that I should stick with size 8.5d loafers and oxfords, which naturally had tighter heels and would have a wider lace gap in Oxfords. These fit snugly in the store, but after a few hours, my pinky toes would be crushed and each step would be very painful. It became clear that my feert were jammed too far in the shoe's front instead of having the widest part at the ball.
At the same time, sneakers almost always fit me perfectly in a 9.5d with a snug heel, ball alignment, and enough toe wiggle room.
I then started to think about my feet in 3-D in terms of the Brannock's limited considerations. My ankles seem to bend inward, which may effectively lower my arches and make fitting into a standard 9.5d very difficult. At the same time, my most comfortably-fitting shoes (Adidas superstars 9.5d) have a ball width that matches an AE 9.5C and 8.5E. This made me wonder if I really need a slightly more narrow 9.5C than the 9.5D in order to accommodate for lower arches/flatter feet and resultant heel slip and ankle gaps.
I've posted pics of my feet for reference. Do they seem to have lower arches and be a little flat, especially on the left foot?
I'm just struggling to get the best all around shoe fit! I suspect that my Brannock length and arch measurements, while correct, don't account for how my ankles bend, which distorts the fit of an otherwise accurate length/arch combo. Would a C vs D width solve this problem? (From top to bottom: right foot, both feet frontal, left foot)
Some time ago, I posted a thread bemoaning the brannock device's uselessness for determining my actual shoe size.
I always measured a 9.5d on the right foot with the same arch and overall foot lengths and a 10d on the left with a 9.5 arch length. However, very rarely did a 9.5d pair of lace shoes or loafers ever really fit. My longer left foot would always have some heel slippage and annoying gaps on the outward facing part of my ankle. The shorter right foot usually never had heel slippage and my ball joint were always at the shoes' widest points for both feet. Even though the balls of my feet would fill out the width of any 9.5d shoes, I'd have to pull laces on oxfords very tight with almost no gap room (for breaking in) to get a snug fit around my arches. Loafers almost never fit well in 9.5d
Even though my ball joints nearly always lined up with the shoe's flex point, I determined that I should stick with size 8.5d loafers and oxfords, which naturally had tighter heels and would have a wider lace gap in Oxfords. These fit snugly in the store, but after a few hours, my pinky toes would be crushed and each step would be very painful. It became clear that my feert were jammed too far in the shoe's front instead of having the widest part at the ball.
At the same time, sneakers almost always fit me perfectly in a 9.5d with a snug heel, ball alignment, and enough toe wiggle room.
I then started to think about my feet in 3-D in terms of the Brannock's limited considerations. My ankles seem to bend inward, which may effectively lower my arches and make fitting into a standard 9.5d very difficult. At the same time, my most comfortably-fitting shoes (Adidas superstars 9.5d) have a ball width that matches an AE 9.5C and 8.5E. This made me wonder if I really need a slightly more narrow 9.5C than the 9.5D in order to accommodate for lower arches/flatter feet and resultant heel slip and ankle gaps.
I've posted pics of my feet for reference. Do they seem to have lower arches and be a little flat, especially on the left foot?
I'm just struggling to get the best all around shoe fit! I suspect that my Brannock length and arch measurements, while correct, don't account for how my ankles bend, which distorts the fit of an otherwise accurate length/arch combo. Would a C vs D width solve this problem? (From top to bottom: right foot, both feet frontal, left foot)