1. Welcome to the new Styleforum!

    We hope you’re as excited as we are to hang out in the new place. There are more new features that we’ll announce in the near future, but for now we hope you’ll enjoy the new site.

    We are currently fine-tuning the forum for your browsing pleasure, so bear with any lingering dust as we work to make Styleforum even more awesome than it was.

    Oh, and don’t forget to head over to the Styleforum Journal, because we’re giving away two pairs of Carmina shoes to celebrate our move!

    Please address any questions about using the new forum to support@styleforum.net

    Cheers,

    The Styleforum Team

    Dismiss Notice

Call me crazy but...

Discussion in 'Health & Body' started by MetroStyles, May 15, 2011.

  1. MetroStyles

    MetroStyles Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    15,831
    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Location:
    New York Shitty
    I find high calves much more aesthetically pleasing than low calves. Especially on women. But I think even a man's physique looks more elegant with high calves than low calves. This goes against bodybuilding standards, but then again most dudes aren't out to be as massive as possible.

    No homo.
     
  2. forStyle

    forStyle Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    82
    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2010
    High calves have better definition. Good for girls.
     
  3. willpower

    willpower Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,414
    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Location:
    West Coast
    This thread couldn't go far without the obligatory...
    IMPORTANT NOTICE: No media files are hosted on these forums. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website. We can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. If the video does not play, wait a minute or try again later. I AGREE

    TIP: to embed Youtube clips, put only the encoded part of the Youtube URL, e.g. eBGIQ7ZuuiU between the tags.
     
  4. Vaio

    Vaio Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    798
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2010
    Location:
    California
  5. Thomas

    Thomas Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    29,119
    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2006
    Location:
    Texas
    yeah, I hate the cankles look myself.
     
  6. Joffrey

    Joffrey Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    11,350
    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2006
    Location:
    Pennsylvania Ave/Connecticut Ave
    High calves have better definition. Good for girls.

    +1. I never thought about it but low calves on girls are gross. Wouldn't know about guys.
     
  7. coop86

    coop86 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    122
    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    I agree, also low calves increase the chances of cankles if they put any weight on...
     
  8. MetroStyles

    MetroStyles Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    15,831
    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Location:
    New York Shitty
    I am talking about my own beautiful svelte high calves, you morans!!
     
  9. in stitches

    in stitches Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    68,895
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Location:
    Charm City
    I find high calves much more aesthetically pleasing than low calves. Especially on women. But I think even a man's physique looks more elegant with high calves than low calves. This goes against bodybuilding standards, but then again most dudes aren't out to be as massive as possible.

    No homo.


    i didnt know there was a party that prefered low calves
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by