Call me crazy but...

[MetroStyles]

I find high calves much more aesthetically pleasing than low calves. Especially on women. But I think even a man's physique looks more elegant with high calves than low calves. This goes against bodybuilding standards, but then again most dudes aren't out to be as massive as possible.

No ****.

 

[forStyle]

High calves have better definition. Good for girls.

 

[willpower]

This thread couldn't go far without the obligatory...
IMPORTANT NOTICE: No media files are hosted on these forums. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website. We can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. If the video does not play, wait a minute or try again later. I AGREE

TIP: to embed Youtube clips, put only the encoded part of the Youtube URL, e.g. eBGIQ7ZuuiU between the tags.

 

[Vaio]

^lol.

 

[Thomas]

yeah, I hate the cankles look myself.

 

[Joffrey]

Originally Posted by forStyle

High calves have better definition. Good for girls.

+1. I never thought about it but low calves on girls are gross. Wouldn't know about guys.

 

[coop86]

I agree, also low calves increase the chances of cankles if they put any weight on...

 

[MetroStyles]

I am talking about my own beautiful svelte high calves, you morans!!

 

[in stitches]

Originally Posted by MetroStyles

I find high calves much more aesthetically pleasing than low calves. Especially on women. But I think even a man's physique looks more elegant with high calves than low calves. This goes against bodybuilding standards, but then again most dudes aren't out to be as massive as possible.

No ****.

i didnt know there was a party that prefered low calves