STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Dude, don’t play dumb. The whole point was that, given experience, one tends to gain a deeper impression of a tailor’s pros and cons, how they work, and what it takes to get optimal results from them.Dude, wtf are you talking about. This is a weird mishmash of ideas.
The "11 commissions" thing started because David and I were talking in a Gennaro thread. You and Iammatt called us "menu tasters" because we liked to try different tailors. This was all in the Gennaro thread, where I tried to get Gennaro to come to San Francisco for a trunk show (another menu tasting, I suppose). I never denied that experience matters. But your point was basically that menu tasters such as me and David have no grounds to talk about tailoring or a certain tailor until we've commissioned 11 things from said tailor. That no comment is valid except for that type of experience. That's absurd.
Crazy that I'm having this convo with someone who argued for the value of long term relationships, but has since thrown out his five pairs of OneShoe and no longer even wears his Rubi jackets, let alone commission new things.
Also, I've never insinuated that you're racist and have no idea what you're talking about.
People interested in the whole 11 commissions saga can read this thread starting with this post
The circularity would be hilarious if it weren't so tragic. Not long ago, everyone was bashing Rubinacci for forcing a style on its clients and robbing them of personal expression. Now, the iGentry is convinced that good Neapolitan tailors make decisions in spite of client requests and...www.styleforum.net
First of all, I wasn't promoting anyone. I was trying to round up enough orders in San Francisco because I wanted to try out his services without having to fly all the way to Italy. I think it's reasonable to see if anyone else is interested in that. People can make their own decisions whether they want to try a new tailor.You, a “sampler”, were promoting Gennaro without any background or experience with him, when he was the cutter for both myself and Iammmatt over many, many commissions. I felt the need to push back on your enthusiasm given the number of vendors (particularly from southern Italy) that have turned out unreliable or straight-up dishonest. This was amidst NSM putting out seemingly hundreds of horrible jackets at a time, before anyone but a small handful of people could see or admit they were very problematic. This was also after Solito straight-up decided not to visit the States anymore and force people to chase them down in Naples for their suits or money. Oh, and Ambrosi—swindler extraordinaire.
Huh? When did I ever suggest you're racist? I explicitly said in my comment that I did not meant to suggest that you're racist. This whole thing came up because you have skateboards hanging in your apartment with graffiti art on them. Nowadays, there's a bunch of rich people who like the "edginess" of street culture but will call the police on the same people who make those cultural references "edgy."You suggested I was racist when you said it was ironic that I enjoyed Basquiat because someone like me would the “sort” to call the police if I saw someone “like him”. Some really ugly shit.
Somehow even worse that a finance guy would valorize a graffiti artist painting on a skateboard while probably calling the cops on the same people when he sees them in real life.
I genuinely didn't mean that you would call the cops on someone for being black or whatever, just that you ascribe to a certain view of the world that probably makes you more likely to call the cops on homeless people, street artists, and people who do drugs. You know, like the Basquait guy that you so valorize.
Yet, was this poast made in good faith? Did DWW really believe the premise on which his claim was built? Or was the above merely constructed ad hoc to impugn the Foo?I'm aware, but it seems strange to hang skateboards on your wall when you have no connection to skateboarding or its culture. It just seems like you hung them because "skateboarding is cool."
I'm not that hung up on the idea of authenticity, but that at least smacks of some kind of inauthenticity.
I realize we hang all sorts of things that we have no connection to, or wear things that we have no connection to, and culture is very fluid and contextual. But to me, that just speaks to the difficult ideas around authenticity. I know in the 90s, authenticity was a huge part of street culture. The worst thing you could be is a poseur. Hanging designer skateboards on your wall when you can't skate has to at least fall into that definition.
I leave it up to StyFo to decide this case.I suppose it depends on whether you want your clothes to reflect some kind of true inner self. And how you think of the concept of a true inner self. I personally don't have a problem with people playing "dress up," so long as they don't affect some kind of phony persona.
I also think that people are complex and have different identities. To the degree there's some true inner self, I think it's more about your personality, temperament, mental state, etc. There's a British documentary called Up, where two filmmakers track fourteen people over a period of something like 56 years -- nine episodes, each spanning 7 years apart -- and you can see how people's personalities remain remarkably consistent. To the degree there's a true self, I think that's probably more meaningful.
The other stuff seems really superficial and complex to me. Do you fancy yourself as a rugged guy, intellectual guy, outdoorsy guy, etc? People have all these things in them, mixed in with reality and aspiration, and they can reveal/ hide them as necessary in different social circumstances. You can dress in ways that reveal your actual activities or just some idealized version of yourself.