• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Barry Bonds one back of Bambino

Dakota rube

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Jan 14, 2005
Messages
13,306
Reaction score
237
Bonds hit his 713th today. Anyone care? I heard someone yapping on ESPN radio today that he thinks Bonds will actually retire during the season this year, leaving Henry Aaron's record untouched.

As much as I believe Bonds is (or was) chemically enhanced, I don't see anyway that MLB can take away whatever record he sets; he's never been proven to have used 'roids, and they weren't specifically against the rules for the longest time.

He still sucks.
 

Steve B.

Go Spurs Go
Joined
Mar 2, 2002
Messages
10,286
Reaction score
134

odoreater

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
8,587
Reaction score
45
The thing is that even if he breaks the record, people will always say that the Bambino was better because he was not on roids.
 

bachbeet

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 3, 2005
Messages
1,183
Reaction score
0
ODOREATER: Similar things could be said of Ruth to lessen his feats. For example, some of the best players were not allowed to play in Ruth's era due to their color.
 

odoreater

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2005
Messages
8,587
Reaction score
45
Originally Posted by bachbeet
ODOREATER: Similar things could be said of Ruth to lessen his feats. For example, some of the best players were not allowed to play in Ruth's era due to their color.

I agree, but that doesn't change the fact that people are still going to say Ruth is better than Bonds.
 

tiger02

Militarist
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,733
Reaction score
3
Originally Posted by odoreater
The thing is that even if he breaks the record, people will always say that the Bambino was better because he was not on roids.
No, Ruth was better because he had a near-HOF pitching career, and if he hadn't moved to 1B he would have made it as a pitcher.

Everyone plays under the rules of their day. Ruth didn't play in an integrated league and didn't have any night or west coast games; Maris had 162 games to hit his 61; Barry has hGH, which is still legal. BTW, Aaron had his best season at age 37.
 

Film Noir Buff

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2005
Messages
6,113
Reaction score
19
Originally Posted by odoreater
The thing is that even if he breaks the record, people will always say that the Bambino was better because he was not on roids.


Remember we dont have The Bambino's records on film like we have most of the modern homerun kings. For all we know many of the things Ruth hit werent true HRs (some voices do say this) the way we know them. Im not saying thats the case but you can see how if people wanted to detract they could rewrite that stat.

A lot of guys are on steroids (or were) a lot of guys didnt hit 713 HRs.

Bonds is just a bitter bitter guy, but he still is a lot of fun to watch hit.

Dusty Baker ruined his only chance to win a ring.
 

Film Noir Buff

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2005
Messages
6,113
Reaction score
19
Originally Posted by tiger02
No, Ruth was better because he had a near-HOF pitching career, and if he hadn't moved to 1B he would have made it as a pitcher.

Everyone plays under the rules of their day. Ruth didn't play in an integrated league and didn't have any night or west coast games; Maris had 162 games to hit his 61; Barry has hGH, which is still legal. BTW, Aaron had his best season at age 37.


Although to the Hall of Fame's credit, Negro league players are now being inducted.

I wonder what it wouldve been like to have Josh Gibson and babe Ruth on the same team. Would make a fantastic counter factual movie or book.

Also remember that Ruth didnt have the type of conditioning, training or diet that the modern sluggers get.

Baseball, which should be what's good about America, unfortunately often exposes what is bad about it.
 

howbah

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2006
Messages
215
Reaction score
2
Originally Posted by Film_Noir_Buff
For all we know many of the things Ruth hit werent true HRs (some voices do say this) the way we know them..

If you mean the fact that for part of Ruth's career a ball that bounced into the stands was scored a HR - that was investigated some time ago. Guys went through every single one of the Babe's HR, not one was a bouncer.

The things baseball fans do in the winter
crazy.gif
laugh.gif


Seriously, non-BB fans, and even many who are fans, would be amazed at how thoroughly recorded & studied the history of the game is.
 

tiger02

Militarist
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,733
Reaction score
3
Originally Posted by howbah
If you mean the fact that for part of Ruth's career a ball that bounced into the stands was scored a HR - that was investigated some time ago. Guys went through every single one of the Babe's HR, not one was a bouncer.

The things baseball fans do in the winter
crazy.gif
laugh.gif


Seriously, non-BB fans, and even many who are fans, would be amazed at how thoroughly recorded & studied the history of the game is.

No kidding, we can be a wacky lot. Couple of resources: www.baseballthinkfactory.com and www.baseball-reference.com, in addition to the much maligned baseballprospectus.com.

I'd have to go back into the history of the rules of the game, but I'm fairly sure a ball caught on a bounce was an out for as long as a ball that bounced over the wall was called a homerun. Remember that the walls that balls were bouncing over were often more than 500 feet from home plate.

Tom
 

Film Noir Buff

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2005
Messages
6,113
Reaction score
19
Originally Posted by howbah
If you mean the fact that for part of Ruth's career a ball that bounced into the stands was scored a HR - that was investigated some time ago. Guys went through every single one of the Babe's HR, not one was a bouncer.

The things baseball fans do in the winter
crazy.gif
laugh.gif


Seriously, non-BB fans, and even many who are fans, would be amazed at how thoroughly recorded & studied the history of the game is.


No, I simply meant we will never be able to see for ourselves. I think baseball scoring and records were done just fine, and yet we still havent the footage of Ruth we have of every other slugger in baseball history. Im not attacking Ruth, I happen to be a Yankees fan and something of a baseball fanatic myself. All Im saying is he is the only slugger we really dont have a lot of footage of, even the Iron Horse is better recorded. Its only significant to show that a detractor can get his say about anyone whether its Bonds on steroids or the Babe on film.

I like this website

http://www.baseballlibrary.com/baseballlibrary/
 

Margaret

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2006
Messages
1,259
Reaction score
1
I've always thought it was odd that ballparks don't have standardized dimensions. A homer in one field is an out in another and a ground-rule double in another? Weird.
 

ATM

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2005
Messages
420
Reaction score
0
Originally Posted by odoreater
The thing is that even if he breaks the record, people will always say that the Bambino was better because he was not on roids.
...
 

whoopee

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
2,420
Reaction score
4
Originally Posted by Margaret
I've always thought it was odd that ballparks don't have standardized dimensions. A homer in one field is an out in another and a ground-rule double in another? Weird.
That's part of the charm of the game.
 

designprofessor

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
2,412
Reaction score
8
I'm still amazed at the lack of credit given to Hank Aaron.
His were some of cherished baseball cards as a kid. But the press seriously overlooks him. Even if Bonds beats them both, if history treats him the same way they did Aaron, he will be all but forgotten.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 91 37.8%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 89 36.9%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 25 10.4%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 40 16.6%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.8%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,805
Messages
10,592,053
Members
224,324
Latest member
dustydbayer
Top