Australian Members

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by earthdragon, Nov 18, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. blahman

    blahman Senior member

    Messages:
    4,559
    Likes Received:
    371
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Location:
    3rd Rock From the Sun
    ^^Yar
     


  2. hotmustardsauce

    hotmustardsauce Active Member

    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2011


  3. blahman

    blahman Senior member

    Messages:
    4,559
    Likes Received:
    371
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2010
    Location:
    3rd Rock From the Sun
    Same last as my Cheaney O'Toole single monks. Can't say I'm a big fan of the last myself as I prefer chiseled toe and narrower width. That said, if you have thicker or wider feet, these should be ok as I find mine to be a little too roomy for my feet... and shoes in this last are apparently already a little narrower than other Cheaney offerings.
     


  4. kickstart

    kickstart Senior member

    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2010
    

    Thank you both for your replies. I do appreciate the help.

    I have not tried the conditioner on the Aquilas as they are very soft to begin with, so I can't see it making a huge difference.

    My Cheaney Leadenhall's are a 9F...which feel like they have a really nice amount of room (definitely not tight, and they feel great) so I'm not sure I'd want to go down a size for the sake of more width. They feel quite a bit more 'roomy' than the Aquila's do which is probably a reflection as too why they don't hurt my feet.

    I guess the real answer is I just have to take the gamble and hope the lacing on the Churchill is OK based on the fact that they are the same last as my Leadenhalls, quite a risk for $300AUD!

    My other option could be these:

    http://www.herringshoes.co.uk/produ...id=143&oldcolid=2680&seconds=&colour_id=2680#

    http://www.cheaney.co.uk/cheaney-co...0/cheaney-newman-in-hand-burnished-dark-leaf#

    Although the colours look vastly different between the Herring Site and the Cheaney site.

    Do you think I could wear those with a navy and mid grey suit sucessfully?


    **Third edit....suffering from serious over analysis. Maybe I should just go with an 8.5G instead of a 9F. Arghhhh.
     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2011


  5. hotmustardsauce

    hotmustardsauce Active Member

    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2011


  6. RemyMichel

    RemyMichel Senior member

    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2010
    Guys i just bought a pair of POLO Ralph Lauren boots on Ebay that are too small for me, im just trying to get my money back, i paid 123.50 including shipping.

    Heres the link of the re listed boots:

    http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/499-Croc...U_Men_Shoes&hash=item4ab0412bc0#ht_500wt_1232

    They are bench made in England so im guessing they are made by Crockett and Jones and they are in good nick.

    Your all welcome to try them on before you buy if your interested. Im looking to get my money back so $135 with shipping included or $115 pick up, whatever is easier!

    cheers
     


  7. meister

    meister Senior member

    Messages:
    7,613
    Likes Received:
    756
    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2007
    
    Look at Bengal's comments below http://www.styleforum.net/t/209008/received-saint-crispins/45#post_4918255
     


  8. kickstart

    kickstart Senior member

    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2010


  9. Journeyman

    Journeyman Senior member

    Messages:
    6,828
    Likes Received:
    1,846
    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2005
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    

    Well, it really depends on the shoe.

    However, most dress shoes - particularly those on "pointier" (or more chiselled) lasts have plenty of room in front of the toes so as long as the shoe fits across your foot, you can go down half-a-size without having to worry about length. It just means that you'll only have 3cm in front of your toes instead of 3.5cm, for example.

    Just be aware, though, that whilst the "going wider to get more overall volume" often works for people with a high instep, it's not always successful. As an example, the last that the Allen-Edmonds Park Ave is made on is a very "flat" or low last. When I tried on a pair a few years ago, I went up to something ridiculous like a 10EEEE and although I had a few cm of space at the side of my foot, it still felt as though the top of my foot was being squashed in a vice whenever I tried to do up the laces, and the "v" at the top of the laces was about 3cm wide.

    So, as I say, it will often work and I've done it with success with shoes from a few English brands such as C&J, Alfred Sargent and Barkers, but if the last is really flat, such as the Allen-Edmonds last, it won't be of much help.
     


  10. fxh

    fxh Senior member

    Messages:
    4,906
    Likes Received:
    1,473
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Location:
    Melbourne
    

    You could chop off the tip of your big toe - shoes are more important than body parts - or cut your toenails or wear thinner socks - or get with the cool kids and wear no socks - _PG_ can advise on this..

    meister and me are on the same page - just explaining it differently.

    What I meant is that if you had a enough room length wise you could go down half a size to avoid too much room all-round. I don't know exactly how Cheaney work but sometimes a half size down doesn't lose much length.

    If how ever its snug size length wise then going to a wider width in the same size with give you more overall volume in height and width as Meister says. You don't need that space across but you will push it up in height. In effect the extra width will translate to height.


    confused now?

    edit:: I just saw Journeymans comment - yes - there is often a reasonable amount of toe room in some shoes. I think there are some inside shoe measurements around on the web. There also an explanation, I think by the redoubtable sator, on the RM Williams thread on going down in size but out in size**. You are lucky in that you have already have a shoe that for most purposes will be the same fit. I do agree the colours on the shoes you linked to look different.

    You could avoid all this and go with the type of shoe you find more comfortable, open laced, two up. Nothing cool about limping around in shoes that hurt. Monk straps often give more flexibility up top too.

    ** or perhaps its up a size and in a width to get a sleeker look. As the young people say "whatever" - its the same principle. In reverse.
     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2011


  11. Jimbosaurus

    Jimbosaurus Senior member

    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    9
    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2010
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Great day from the parcel guy for me! A lovely drakes tie from CEP has arrived and also...

    Carmina time!

    The RustiCalf is very interesting, lovely and a soft with a light grain to it. Dealing with Ethan was a pleasure, final word on fit is yet to come as I'm wearing my thick wool socks today. :facepalm:
     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2011


  12. The Ernesto

    The Ernesto Senior member

    Messages:
    3,541
    Likes Received:
    1,550
    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010


  13. hotmustardsauce

    hotmustardsauce Active Member

    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2011
    Jimbo where did you buy those monks from and how much?
     


  14. Jimbosaurus

    Jimbosaurus Senior member

    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    9
    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2010
    Location:
    Melbourne
    

    They're these Carminas from The Armoury. Ended up costing me ~600AUD after shipping and conversion fees.
     


  15. RemyMichel

    RemyMichel Senior member

    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2010
    Guys, does anyone know where you can rent/ buy docos on things such as Bill Cunningham NY and Omast
     


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by