JTA
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2008
- Messages
- 855
- Reaction score
- 12
Ms fxh used to constantly complain that I dressed up all week to go to work and then at nights and weekends dressed down for her. (she NEVER complains when I un - dress for her)
But really - what sort of idiot wants to put on a tie to go out to eat at the local Vietnamese or a fillum at the weekend when most of the other tossers can't be bothered to put on a clean ironed shirt or pants that fit? That level of "dressing up" would qualify one for the AAAC stereotype or half the youthful misogynist septics that post here on SF. (not on the oz threads I hasten to add)
Mate, you are hilarious LOL nevertheless in general Melbourne people are still better dressed than their Sydney compatriots. Have the sophisticated air...
Someone was talking about the nouveau / CUBs (cashed up bogans) penchant for ill fitting overpriced brand names in clothes as opposed to the tasteful clobber that us eGents would purchase should we win tatts or **** our way into a fortune through marriage.
As an example I have before me the "Luxury" mag from this Friday's Fin Review.
Page 31 - guy in white pants cross between jeans and chinos, looks like a boot cut bottom or widish, thin strappy sandals, low cut empire line t shirt, and cream leather jacket, very tight fit.
Doesn't look all that bad, in a beach holiday Lorne / Brighton hipster sort of way, but not much more than you might see around occasionally.
Prices? - Got a brown paper bag to stop hyperventilation handy?
Hermes leather Jacket = $14, 850 - thats more than my car is worth and with a lot less leather than my car.
Short sleeved cotton T shirt= $425 - some good floating canvass suits are cheaper on line.
Pants = $1020 - I'd say Rivers pants at $49 look as good.
Belt = $1020 - yes its a fuckin belt!
Sandals = $435
Speechless
This cracks me up