• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Australia to ban ultra-skinny models

XenoX101

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
4,606
Reaction score
20
http://www.news.com.au/entertainment...-1225884746665 Excerpt:
Originally Posted by The Sunday Telegraph
Youth Minister Kate Ellis will today unveil a new body-image tick of approval, similar to the Heart Foundation's healthy foods tick, to be awarded to magazines, modelling agencies and fashion labels that meet the following criteria: - Disclose when images have been retouched and refrain from enhancing photographs in a way that changes a person's body shape, for example, lengthening their legs or trimming their waist, or removing freckles, lines and other distinguishing marks. - Only use models aged 16 or older to model adult clothes - both on catwalks and in print. - Refrain from using models who are very thin - or male models who are excessively muscular. - Stocking clothing in a wide variety of sizes in shops to reflect the demand from customers. - Using a broad range of body shapes, sizes and ethnicities in editorial and advertising. - Not promoting rapid weight loss, cosmetic surgery, excessive exercising or any advertisements or editorial content that may promote a negative body image.
I'm not sure how I feel about this, sounds good in theory, I guess.
 

onion

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
3,047
Reaction score
3
givenchy-backstage.jpg
And yeah, this bill is ******* marsupialed.
 

z7f9q

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2010
Messages
1,310
Reaction score
4
More muscles than most people isn't the same as healthier than most people.

Anyways, this is a foolish bill, but I suppose they have good intentions. It'll probably have zero impact.
 

Makeshift_Robot

Distinguished Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2010
Messages
1,410
Reaction score
55
Should ban all movies featuring attractive people, all books in which people are being described as tall, slim, or attractive, The Nightmare Before Christmas in any form, and photographs of handsome people.

All the tall, slim people walking around will be ordered never to leave the house, so that your average fatass doesn't end up feeling bad.

It also indicates an incredible lack of respect for couture as an art form. "Designers can't be "edgy" or "cool"! They should just make clothes for everyone to wear!"
 

XenoX101

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
4,606
Reaction score
20
One thing to note though is that the only thing they infer will be banned is this. "Designers will be asked not to hire either models with a dangerously low body mass index (BMI) or excessively muscular men." And so the other stuff, marketed under the 'body-image tick of approval' will not be enforced, but simply encouraged to be followed as a guideline, similar to the heart foundation tick (which I'd guesstimate 90% of processed foods in our market don't have). If it were enforced, then they wouldn't be able to distinguish brands with a 'tick of approval' as all brands would have to meet the rules by law, thus making the tick useless.
 

A Fellow Linguist

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
2,370
Reaction score
4,244
They should also make strong people carry weights all the time, and make attractive people wear masks.

But anyway, the title of the thread/article is sensational. They're not banning anything, just offering a seal of approval.

edit: oh **** beat by xenox
 

MetroStyles

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
May 4, 2006
Messages
14,586
Reaction score
30
The muscular thing is marsupialed. The too skinny thing has some merit.
 

Captain Winky

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Messages
870
Reaction score
2
Originally Posted by MetroStyles
The muscular thing is marsupialed. The too skinny thing has some merit.

While I don't believe it is the state's place to regulate this, I agree. I think far more women will starve themselves/binge & purge in order to be thin than men will start using steroids or other dangerous drugs. And let's face it, a lot of men could afford to fit the gym...

And on another note, the male models I see aren't necessarily excessively muscular, like body builders, but, like actors, are just very cut. They are then photographed in a way that makes them look big.
 

Synthese

Darth Millennial
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
8,543
Reaction score
30,080
Originally Posted by A Fellow Linguist
They should also make strong people carry weights all the time, and make attractive people wear masks.

Oh **** which story is this from, haven't read that since I was like 10
 

mondayc

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2008
Messages
315
Reaction score
0
Why do we feel the need to appease fat people
ffffuuuu.gif
?
 

phildo

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
546
Reaction score
0
woah the average american waist is 39"
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 85 37.6%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 86 38.1%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 24 10.6%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 35 15.5%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 36 15.9%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,427
Messages
10,589,164
Members
224,227
Latest member
PitbullRancher
Top