gustavobradley
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2016
- Messages
- 204
- Reaction score
- 626
Any tighter than like 6" and you're going to have a really hard time getting them over your feet, and when they're on it's going to look way too tight
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I dunno man. I have calves just slightly under 16" (never thought of them as really large, just not chicken legs), while, yes, a 6.5" hem is pretty skinny (I can't get them up to my calves), they are right for a stack on top of boots. That said, I personally prefer to have hems of about 7-7.25", which is more versatile.I have some relatively large calves (IMO) with ~16" around and 6.5" hems as mentioned above gives off the leggings effect. If that's your case something that allows for stretch (Cotton/EA blend) would be your best bet.
No problem with 7" hem for boot tuck and cropped pants ftw.
yeah that could be true actually...
my 31s are like 6.25", so sizes 33 and up could potentially pass 6.5"/7" i suppose.
still a pretty tiny hem size though, not really sure why you'd want tighter?
Maybe his calves are skinny? I can't have anything less than 7" hems or I can't pull it up to zip or tie my boots as I don't tuck my pants/jeans in my boots anyway.
This is true I'm just gonna order a bunch of jeans and see what fits best.
Dammit those SLP jeans...
Btw anyone know what jeans have 6.5 or less inch hems?
FYI SLP D02's are pretty snug in the crotch.
Or I'm just well hung
Went to Super A market, a garbage store carrying some cool brands, and they had the sickest GBS silk/cashmere blazer for a sweet $4500
Good grief
It has everything I hate about stores:
- staff didn't acknowledge me