Anyone have Crockett and Jones pics they can share? ...

[cmeisenzahl]

Let me live vicariously through you for a bit? Thanks! ;-)

 

[Ich_Dien]

Hallam, Beechnut on the 348 Last.

Bottom Left 3 2nd from top left

 

[cmeisenzahl]

Fantastic, thanks!

 

[Razele]

If you look at Phat Guido's posts in What Are You Wearing, he has alot.

Also, he posted a stack in a thread recently, about Australian shoes.

 

[tricota]

Should be plenty examples in this thread...

http://www.styleforum.net/showthread...97#post1759297

 

[NH_Clark]

Excuse my mobile phone pics:

C&J Belgrave I picked up on eBay 6 months ago.

 

[AscotMcPocketsquare]

Originally Posted by cmeisenzahl

Let me live vicariously through you for a bit? Thanks! ;-)

They are overrated shoes. For the price JM Weston >>>>>>>>>>> C&J

 

[slt]

http://www.styleforum.net/showpost.p...72&postcount=3

http://www.crockettandjones.co.uk/collections.html

 

[grimslade]

Originally Posted by AscotMcPocketsquare

They are overrated shoes. For the price JM Weston >>>>>>>>>>> C&J

JMWeston costs >>>>>>> C&J

 

[AscotMcPocketsquare]

Originally Posted by grimslade

JMWeston costs >>>>>>> C&J

I recently bought a pair of Weston's and a pair of C&J. I could be remembering incorrectly but I thought the Weston's were around $800 and the C&J were at least $5-600. Close enough.

 

[Tarmac]

$300 is close enough?

I got a deal for you. You paypal me $800, I will paypal you $500-$600. Done deal.

 

[NH_Clark]

I should add that I paid $134 shipped.

 

[AscotMcPocketsquare]

Originally Posted by Tarmac

$300 is close enough?

I got a deal for you. You paypal me $800, I will paypal you $500-$600. Done deal.

If you're going to spend that much on a shoe it shouldn't really be an issue to spend another $200.

 

[Cary Grant]

Originally Posted by AscotMcPocketsquare

If you're going to spend that much on a shoe it shouldn't really be an issue to spend another $200.

That's a 60% difference. Significant no matter what the scale. Or to reverse your argument- then one should buy 2pr C&J's because the $200 increased expense is insignificant. And you two pairs to boot.

 

[AscotMcPocketsquare]

Originally Posted by Cary Grant

That's a 60% difference. Significant no matter what the scale. Or to reverse your argument- then one should buy 2pr C&J's because the $200 increased expense is insignificant. And you two pairs to boot.

If you were comparing 2 pairs of C&J to 1 pair of Weston and $ was a concern I see no problem with applying that reasoning to talk yourself into 2 pair of shoes. I wanted to try both shoe makers, and now I know never to go back to C&J.