1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

Anyone else tired of the slim fitting trend?

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by intent, Sep 23, 2009.

  1. gdl203

    gdl203 Senior member Dubiously Honored Affiliate Vendor

    Messages:
    36,650
    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2005
    Location:
    New York
    this is what 3% looks like and it can only be held for a few hours because your subcutaneous water levels are near 0

    That guy is fat compared to me. I re-measured this morning and my drop went up to 16". woot woot

    2.2??? thats not even healthy. who measured that?
    I measured it online. With my iPhone
     
  2. Shirtmaven

    Shirtmaven Senior member Dubiously Honored

    Messages:
    3,336
    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2003
    Location:
    NYC
    I am ok with slim the super tight is making my life hell.
    the idea of having a dress shirt as close to the skin as a knit shirt does not work.

    the idea of not having any fullness above the waistline in the back makes sitting down impossible with out the shirt pulling every way.

    also the shoulder posture on the boys who want super slim shirts is usually awful
    rolling shoulders do to toomuch computer usage makes everything break.
    Carl
     
  3. gomestar

    gomestar Senior member

    Messages:
    19,385
    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Location:
    NYC
    my period stopped when I went below 4% body fat.
     
  4. DLester

    DLester Senior member

    Messages:
    6,398
    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    I can't even think of the last time I saw a guy in a major airport wearing a suit or jacket that didn't bulge a full inch or so off the shoulder

    dood that was the Bottega pagoda shoulder -- the height of fashion. It is everywherez.
     
  5. amplifiedheat

    amplifiedheat Senior member

    Messages:
    1,419
    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    The real problem is when GQ starts hawking tight tailored clothing under the pretense of slimness:
    http://men.style.com/gq/fashion/slid...ay=false&cnt=1
    That slideshow shows:
    1)a jacket with crazy tightness lines at the waist
    2)trousers with tightness in the crotch and pockets flaring out
    3)another absurdly tight jacket and trousers
    5)the tightest trousers yet. Note also comically short jacket.
    Throughout, sleeves are consistently wrinkled from tightness. Remember that this is an unnaturally thin male model--if this clothing is tight on him, who is it made for?

    Thus, even if the slim-fit trend has its advantages for those of us who know what we're doing, it will inevitably have bad results in the form of men who think tightness=cool.
     
  6. Luddite

    Luddite Senior member

    Messages:
    291
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Location:
    New Zealand
    I'm more concerned with the sweet dinner suit and sneakers and dinner suit and long tie combos there.

    You can wear a tightish suit without looking absolutely fucking ridiculous, but...
     
  7. Spark

    Spark Senior member

    Messages:
    444
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Location:
    Thereabouts
    RE: the GQ approach.

    If I'm not mistaken, I just flipped through an issue that suggested to shop for a suit you needed to "find one that fits, and then buy the next size down."

    Silly me and my tailoring bills - I've been doing it all wrong!
     
  8. vitaminc

    vitaminc Senior member

    Messages:
    2,407
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Location:
    Silicon Valley, CA
    You're not too bright, are you? When you think you know better than the Duke of Windsor, you know you're a slave to the fashions.
    Are you suggesting that even the Duke of Windsor fell victim by fashion, that his pants went from extremely baggy to not so baggy as time progress? [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  9. MatthewN

    MatthewN Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    73
    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2009
    RE: the GQ approach.

    If I'm not mistaken, I just flipped through an issue that suggested to shop for a suit you needed to "find one that fits, and then buy the next size down."

    Silly me and my tailoring bills - I've been doing it all wrong!


    I'm going to assume (i.e. hope) that what they're getting at is that most people misjudge which size fits them and pick something too big (which is often true), and they're suggesting this a a workaround.
     
  10. aznwolvie

    aznwolvie New Member

    Messages:
    3
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2009
    i agree, i'd say most shoppers in America buy clothes that fit too baggy. I know most of my friends fall victim to this since we grew up wearing baggy clothes being the cool way to dress
     
  11. Chim12

    Chim12 Senior member

    Messages:
    198
    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Location:
    EWH SFO CDG
    I'm going to assume (i.e. hope) that what they're getting at is that most people misjudge which size fits them and pick something too big (which is often true), and they're suggesting this a a workaround.

    It was in the latest issue, it reads to size down until you know the jacket is clearly too tight and then go up one size. Perhaps a reasonable approach to help with getting away from the baggy issues as a workaround. Sounds like a reasonable approach to those who don't know where to begin.
     
  12. oroy38

    oroy38 Senior member

    Messages:
    524
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    It's not the clothes that I have a problem with. It's the obsession over the term "slim." There are things labeled as slim fit that simply aren't. People are too worried about whether something is labeled as such rather than if it actually fits. I've seen people choose an inferior piece of clothing that fits terribly but was labeled as slim over a perfectly well fitting piece of clothing that was not labeled as such. What would happen if we simply got rid of the phrase "slim fit?" My guess is that people would actually start judging clothes by fit rather than labels.
     
  13. babygreenspots

    babygreenspots Senior member

    Messages:
    1,214
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2006
    Location:
    Beijing
    The times matter though...I think one would not look exactly chic dressed in trousers anywhere near as loose as though worn by the Duke of Windsor, who was more concerned about being elegant than hip, a concept to which most of us do fall victim.

    On a slim person, a trim may be best, but tight is better than baggy, unless the baggy is done in a particularly avant-garde manner. You can't just wear standard, loose-fitting, trousers and expect to look hip - maybe respectable and gentlemanly.
     
  14. hth2002

    hth2002 Senior member

    Messages:
    116
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    For men with 28-32 inch waist and slim torso, slim fit clothes have a more tailored look than the regular fit boxy clothes.
     
  15. amplifiedheat

    amplifiedheat Senior member

    Messages:
    1,419
    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    The times matter though...I think one would not look exactly chic dressed in trousers anywhere near as loose as though worn by the Duke of Windsor, who was more concerned about being elegant than hip, a concept to which most of us do fall victim.

    On a slim person, a trim may be best, but tight is better than baggy, unless the baggy is done in a particularly avant-garde manner. You can't just wear standard, loose-fitting, trousers and expect to look hip - maybe respectable and gentlemanly.


    Elegant > hip. Classic > chic. Baggy=correctable, tight=feminine=unacceptable.
     
    1 person likes this.
  16. amplifiedheat

    amplifiedheat Senior member

    Messages:
    1,419
    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Are you suggesting that even the Duke of Windsor fell victim by fashion, that his pants went from extremely baggy to not so baggy as time progress?
    [/IMG]

    No, I'm saying that the Duke of Windsor proves what I've been saying all along, which is that there is more than one correct way for clothes to fit.
     
  17. comrade

    comrade Senior member

    Messages:
    5,875
    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Location:
    Menlo Park, CA
    Slim? When I ran 30 miles/week and was 20 years younger,
    I wasn't slim. Natural selection seems to have given me a
    body to save me from a famine. So far, no famine.
     
  18. MetroStyles

    MetroStyles Senior member

    Messages:
    15,831
    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Location:
    New York Shitty
    Wah wah wah skinny lapels anger me wah wah wah. Stfu.
     
  19. JLibourel

    JLibourel Senior member

    Messages:
    8,602
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    I can't say I am "tired" of this trend simply because it really doesn't impinge on my being.

    Fashions come and go. Timeless style and elegance endure indefinitely.
     
  20. Nas

    Nas Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    65
    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    No, I don't really give a shit what others wear. I don't live in a big city so no one is aware of fads less than 3 years old anyway.
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by