- Feb 16, 2020
- Reaction score
No it's fine, I appreciate it of course. With time I realized the name of the tannery doesn't matter that muchThe issue I see with the comparisons is that, if you are going make comparisons with what's in your closet, I think you should disclose that and also mention any specifics with the old pair that is used for comparison. I think that if the goal is to educate the viewers, then you should always inform them what the differences are. Never assume that the viewers are educated on the matter.
For example: you can mention how old the AM pairs are and what line and construction they are etc.
Also, I see that you kinda jumped on that review without all of the information at hand. You mentioned that you didn't know what leather on the PS but was going to ask later. I think it's beneficial to have such information ready. It makes you look better prepared. Even if the answer is: "I inquired but didn't receive a reply."
Lastly, I feel that a lot of reviewers say "only the best materials" but fail to say what the materials are.. (celastic toe? leather stiffeners? vegetable tanned lining? chrome tanned insoles? Oak bark tanned soles? 6mm soles? Etc). I think you also mentioned something about spi being good but didn't actually give a number.
Anyway, those are just some unwanted suggestions haha.
I should have linked at the article where Jesper cut them open a few years back as well. I do this as a hobby really (it takes too much time to pen 3-3.5k words actually) and on top, English is obviously not my mother tongue.