• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

American Geniuses

Lighthouse

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2010
Messages
7,424
Reaction score
1,490

Emerson. And why is wrong about Pynchon and Frost.


Agree. I love quarks and string theory as much as the next guy, but genius can be found in music, art, literature, rhetoric, and cooking.
 

Baron

Distinguished Member
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Oct 5, 2004
Messages
8,156
Reaction score
3,461
Hendrix, Ellington, Dylan.

The word is kinda fraught, no? What's the criteria? What about Babe Ruth? Michael Jordan? Barry Bonds?

I'm comfortable calling Einstein or Newton or Mozart geniuses because they had talent and accomplishments that were greater than merely generational. They were an order of magnitude beyond that.
 

Lighthouse

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2010
Messages
7,424
Reaction score
1,490

Hendrix, Ellington, Dylan.
The word is kinda fraught, no? What's the criteria? What about Babe Ruth? Michael Jordan? Barry Bonds?
I'm comfortable calling Einstein or Newton or Mozart geniuses because they had talent and accomplishments that were greater than merely generational. They were an order of magnitude beyond that.


How interesting that you pick the three names that pop into my head every time I hear the word. Yes, if you want to talk in those terms, we really don't have an American genius.
 

redcaimen

Bigtime
Joined
Mar 22, 2006
Messages
6,787
Reaction score
552
Jerry Lewis

/Etienne
 

jrd617

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Messages
15,291
Reaction score
2,660
This guy

feynman_finger.jpg


 
Last edited:

HORNS

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Apr 24, 2008
Messages
18,392
Reaction score
9,008

Hendrix, Ellington, Dylan.

The word is kinda fraught, no? What's the criteria? What about Babe Ruth? Michael Jordan? Barry Bonds?

I'm comfortable calling Einstein or Newton or Mozart geniuses because they had talent and accomplishments that were greater than merely generational. They were an order of magnitude beyond that.


This is one of the reasons why I started this threak - the history of the U.S. is very short so statistically we'd have less of a pool to consider, plus I'd like to consider some athletes as brilliant but I think some coaches would get closer to, but not over the line into the realm of genius. I think of Tony LaRussa or Phil Jackson as strategists who are unequaled in their realm of coaches (in my mind).

As far as musicians, I have to say that a true contributor to the world of music is Miles Davis. Genius? Yeah, I feel strongly that he's a genius and that his name will be known two hundred years from now.
 

rach2jlc

Prof. Fabulous
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
14,663
Reaction score
1,162
Gell-Mann? (annoying personality but, with Feynman, has his name on most of the big physics accomplishments since the 1950's)

Pennglock's list is good; I'd add to Jaynes a mention of Claude Shannon.

In any case (channeling Howard Gardner) there are different "types" of genius/intelligence that make it hard to compare. So, it's hard to see how Feynman and, say, Martha Graham or Glenn Gould, might be on the same list.

There is also political genius; the number of (non-political) smart people who knew Richard Nixon (including Friedman, IIRC) called him as much. Others have said similar things about Bill Clinton.

I wish we could include the Hungarian-born but happily US-citizen John von Neumann. Look the guy up if you've never heard of him; he died sadly in his early fifties, but he had his fingerprint on 2/3 of everything we take for granted these days, from quantum mechanics to nuclear power to game theory to the personal computer. He was also a snappy dresser.
 
Last edited:

in stitches

Stylish Dinosaur
Spamminator Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2010
Messages
66,397
Reaction score
33,106
would you consider bill gates to belong in the conversation?
 

MikeDT

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
4,272
Reaction score
282
Liberace
Michael Jackson
Elvis Presley
Jimi Hendrix
 
Last edited:

rach2jlc

Prof. Fabulous
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
14,663
Reaction score
1,162



"...a deadly, winking, sniggering, snuggling, chromium-plated, scent-impregnated, luminous, quivering, giggling, fruit-flavoured, mincing, ice-covered heap of mother love."

Sounds a bit like our own Prof Fab (haha)

Given the celeb culture of the 21st century, and the young average age of SFers, I think it's hard for most to realize the phenomenon that was LIberace (and the fact that only in America could a flamingly gay, unattractive, mediocre concert pianist named Wladiu become the highest paid entertainer in the world)

 
Last edited:

Fang66

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2009
Messages
6,753
Reaction score
683

FtRoyalty

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
167
Reaction score
18
Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers discusses this topic if anyone has read it.
 

Fang66

Distinguished Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2009
Messages
6,753
Reaction score
683

Gell-Mann? (annoying personality but, with Feynman, has his name on most of the big physics accomplishments since the 1950's)
Pennglock's list is good; I'd add to Jaynes a mention of Claude Shannon.
In any case (channeling Howard Gardner) there are different "types" of genius/intelligence that make it hard to compare. So, it's hard to see how Feynman and, say, Martha Graham or Glenn Gould, might be on the same list.
There is also political genius; the number of (non-political) smart people who knew Richard Nixon (including Friedman, IIRC) called him as much. Others have said similar things about Bill Clinton.
I wish we could include the Hungarian-born but happily US-citizen John von Neumann. Look the guy up if you've never heard of him; he died sadly in his early fifties, but he had his fingerprint on 2/3 of everything we take for granted these days, from quantum mechanics to nuclear power to game theory to the personal computer. He was also a snappy dresser.


Tesla was also a snappy dresser, one more thing he had over the slovenly gangster Edison. There are plenty of immigrants who were snappier dressers than Edison though, Kurt Gödel for example.
 

FLMountainMan

White Hispanic
Joined
Aug 18, 2006
Messages
13,558
Reaction score
2,080
I think that art, as subjective as it is, precludes a consensus of "genius". At least in the short-term. I think there are a few who withstand the test of time.
 

jaypee

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
1,269
Reaction score
150

Liberace
Michael Jackson
Elvis Presley
Jimi Hendrix


All very talented, but psychometrically none of these people were geniuses. You are just naming famous people.

...Iggy Pop, I could go on and on


I can't tell if you're having a laugh or not?

Christopher Langan was a genius.. Amadeo Giannini was a very intelligent man..
 
Last edited:

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 92 37.7%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 90 36.9%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 26 10.7%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 40 16.4%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.6%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,860
Messages
10,592,568
Members
224,331
Latest member
JuliHote
Top