• I'm happy to introduce the Styleforum Happy Hour, our brand new podcast featuring lively discussion about menswear and the fashion industry. In the inaugural edition, a discussion of what's going on in retail today. Please check it out on the Journal. All episodes will be also be available soon on your favorite podcast platform.

  • Hi, we have updated our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy in anticipation of the upcoming new Calfornia laws, the CCPA. If you are a resident of California, these rights pertain to you. Thanks - Styleforum Team.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

Alternatives to Alden Suede Flexwelt Chukka?

viator

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
708
Reaction score
14
The Peal one is very nice and much less expensive, but it has a crepe sole.
 

heidegger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2011
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
allen edmonds amok
The Amok has some bad reviews. It is MUCH cheaper though - currently 170 discounted at AE while the Alden is alomst 300 more and not often discounted. I'm wondering how much difference there could be - both unlined with leather sole and it is not like AE is known for low quality.
 

hookem12387

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
1,370
Reaction score
508
This is purely personal experience, so keep that in mind. I got the Amok just before Christmas, and the quality was quite poor. After they started squeaking mercilessly, I took them back for an exchange. They replace it with a much nicer shoe with much nicer suede. I'd now say they're pretty nice, assuming you can get the second version.
 

Thanks SF (a new me)

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2011
Messages
1,331
Reaction score
213
Originally Posted by member mcass - AE appreciation thread

Thought I would post my comparison of the AE Amok as compared to an Alden 1493 snuff suede chukka. I currently own olive Amoks (first run of Amoks, purchased on clearance at $99 - should have gotten a different color, but oh well). Recently purchased an Alden 1493 suede chukka. I suspect many have been curious about the differences between these two, I know I've been. Let it be known that I'm a major AE fan, especially from a value perspective (factory second sales mean that most of my AE purchases are in the $150-200 per pair range - really can't beat this..). I have around 12 pairs of AEs, and until now it had been the only brand that I own.

I anticipated purchasing the Alden 1493 and AE Snuff Amok to compare colors. Your price comparison is $460 for a pair of the Aldens, to $250 for the Amoks. Factory second Amoks would be $199. I can tell you that I've never spent over $220 on a pair of shoes before, the Aldens were a big jump for me...

I did not end up purchasing the Snuff Amok. After receiving the Alden, I compared to my olive Amoks and found the following:

1. The quality of the Alden suede far surpasses AE's suede quality. AE's suede isn't horrendous by any means, but Alden's is truly buttery smooth. My AEs have only had about 4 wears so far, and there's already some marks that I know I'm gonna have a difficult time removing. And they've been babied, in my opinion. (Note that I did not clean these up at all before snapping the pictures below). I feel I can confidently say that the Alden suede is going to hold up much better in the long run.

2. There are subtle differences in the shape of the shoe. You'll notice that the AE is a bit more pointy in 2 aspects. First, in the overall shape, the toe is a tad bit more pointy. Secondly, the AE's cut a bit more pointy or forward where the quarters (??) meet the vamp (??) (somebody correct me if I'm using the wrong terms...). The Aldens round downward at this area, and I personally prefer the rounded shapes of the Alden more.

3. The Alden has a small heel support on the insole. At first, it was annoying...felt like a big piece sticking into my foot. But comparing back and forth between the Amok and the Alden, the support is helpful and more comfortable. As soon as I got used to it, I tried the Amoks back on and if felt like I was now missing something. The support makes a difference in daily walking.

4. Better appearance of "layering" in the heel. See side-by-side pics for what I'm referring to...

There aren't many other differences to speak of. They both are 2 eyelet chukkas with an oil soaked sole and split-reverse welts. The shape and the suede quality were my 2 big factors between the 2 shoes.

So, regardless of the price, I ended up keeping the Aldens. My thoughts can be summarized as this: Nobody besides you, the wearer, is going to recognize the differences in these shoes. They honestly look nearly identical. If the little things change your opinion though, you're going to struggle with the AEs after trying the Aldens. The Aldens are just a bit nicer. Are they worth an extra $210-260 over the AEs? No, not really. The AEs are far and away a better value. But, to me, the details made enough of a difference that I knew I wouldn't be truly satisfied with the AE version and I'd always be wanting the Alden pair. I hope this helps anybody who's been on the fence one way or the other. If you have money to kill, try the Aldens (I didn't, but hey..finances be damned..). If you don't, please please please go with the AEs.


I've included some pictures below. Again, these are the olive Amoks versus the snuff Aldens, and I had originally planned to try the Snuff AEs until I saw the differences above... Pardon the crappy cell pics. Lastly - please note that I am normally an 8.5D in AE. I took an 8E in the Aldens. Feel free to PM if you have any questions about either of these.
 

hookem12387

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
1,370
Reaction score
508
The difference in the lasts is definitely something to take note of. The AE's last is sleeker, and I actually like it less. Alden suede is definitely better than that of the Amok, too (comparing to Alden snuff suede lhs). The differences are significantly less with this second run of Amoks, though. A lot less.
 

heidegger

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2011
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
The difference in the lasts is definitely something to take note of. The AE's last is sleeker, and I actually like it less. Alden suede is definitely better than that of the Amok, too (comparing to Alden snuff suede lhs). The differences are significantly less with this second run of Amoks, though. A lot less.
Ok but how does one know they are getting the second run? Is there some marking?
 

hyt123

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
137
Reaction score
4
Derp post: asked same question as above
 
Last edited:

hookem12387

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
1,370
Reaction score
508

Ok but how does one know they are getting the second run? Is there some marking?

No idea other than to feel the shoe. If it's thin, stretchy suede it's the first run. If it's thicker suede, it's the second. There may be some other way to know, but I'm not sure what it would be
 

jaywhyy

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2013
Messages
878
Reaction score
271
Any other opinions on this? I'm considering the Alden 1493s which are $486 vs the AE snuff amoks which are $162.
 

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by

Featured Sponsor

How wide do you like your leg opening on your trousers?

  • 7”

    Votes: 52 16.8%
  • 7.5”

    Votes: 107 34.5%
  • 8”

    Votes: 92 29.7%
  • 8.5”

    Votes: 34 11.0%
  • 9”

    Votes: 12 3.9%
  • 9.5”

    Votes: 7 2.3%
  • 10”

    Votes: 1 0.3%
  • 10.5”

    Votes: 5 1.6%

Related Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
432,144
Messages
9,269,894
Members
194,583
Latest member
DAK
Top