Allen Edmonds "Traveler"

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by clarinetplayer, Sep 18, 2006.

  1. clarinetplayer

    clarinetplayer Senior member

    Messages:
    4,607
    Likes Received:
    7,595
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2002
    Location:
    Michigan
    Has anyone purchased/worn a pair of the Allen Edmonds "casual comfort" shoe, the "Traveler"? Any comments? Worth the money?

    [​IMG]
     
  2. VMan

    VMan Senior member

    Messages:
    5,103
    Likes Received:
    25
    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2003
    I'm not a fan of sneaker/shoe hybrids. I think each serves a good purpose - when dressing up, wear nice leather shoes. When dressing down, wear sneakers. If it's a dress-casual situation, wear a pair of leather ankle boots or rubber-soled blutchers.

    To me, shoes in this style remind me of 1998-2001.
     
  3. Jovan

    Jovan Banned for Good

    Messages:
    2,533
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    They look like any other bowling shoe.
     
  4. alexei

    alexei Senior member

    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2006
    Location:
    I'm your neighbor
    I'm going to buy either the Day-Tripper or the Traveler within the next few weeks... I can let you know after that. But I haven't had time to go try them out at the Chicago AE store and none of the AE vendors in my area sell them.
     
  5. JLibourel

    JLibourel Senior member

    Messages:
    8,608
    Likes Received:
    397
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    For a shoe that is non-recraftable and has heels with air pockets in them, which will wear down and out quickly, $230 seems like a lot of money to me. (No seconds are ever going to be offered either, I am told). There is a lot of similar product in ultra-casual shoes for a lot less money, it seems to me. They may not have all the excellent design features of the A-Es, and they won't be made in the USA, but if they do the job, that's what counts.

    I have both colors of the Wilbert that I bought for a lot less money. Better looking shoes, IMO, and re-craftable. If I wanted something else on that order in the current A-E line, I'd rather get the Fulton (seconds, of course).
     
  6. Carey

    Carey Senior member

    Messages:
    174
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Tods among others have much more fashionable rubber soled shoes. When will this whole bicycle shoe thing die the death it deserves?
     
  7. StevenRocks

    StevenRocks Senior member

    Messages:
    617
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    Location:
    Southwest Virginia
    I'm not a fan of sneaker/shoe hybrids. I think each serves a good purpose - when dressing up, wear nice leather shoes. When dressing down, wear sneakers. If it's a dress-casual situation, wear a pair of leather ankle boots or rubber-soled blutchers.

    To me, shoes in this style remind me of 1998-2001.

    I agree. This look is very dated now, and it's not really appropriate for a wide variety of situations.
     
  8. alexei

    alexei Senior member

    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2006
    Location:
    I'm your neighbor
    While it is still my intent to buy the Day-Tripper, the Traveler is growing on me slightly (though I'm not sure enough). Anyway, the Day-Tripper is very similar. The Wilbert seems to be a very different shoe aside from having a rubber sole. You call this a sneaker/shoe hybrid, but it's really just a well-made sneaker - that's it, don't give it undue credit. I don't recommend wearing this style of shoe for anything other than casual situations.
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by