1. And... we're back. You'll notice that all of your images are back as well, as are our beloved emoticons, including the infamous :foo: We have also worked with our server folks and developers to fix the issues that were slowing down the site.

    There is still work to be done - the images in existing sigs are not yet linked, for example, and we are working on a way to get the images to load faster - which will improve the performance of the site, especially on the pages with a ton of images, and we will continue to work diligently on that and keep you updated.

    Cheers,

    Fok on behalf of the entire Styleforum team
    Dismiss Notice

Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread - reviews, pictures, sizing, etc...

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by Mild Mannered, Sep 27, 2009.

Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 0ShinAkuma0

    0ShinAkuma0 Active Member

    Messages:
    35
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2012
    Location:
    Texas
    They certainly go with grey and I personally think they go with brown but it's a little iffy, depends on the shad of brown I guess, I think they go better with a lighter shade of brown. I tried them on with a couple of different pants, hope it helps.

    Grey jeans:

    [​IMG]

    Light Brown trousers, wool:

    [​IMG]

    Dark brown trousers, wool:

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Badandy

    Badandy Senior member

    Messages:
    196
    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Do you think the McTavish essentially fills the role of the McAllister or are they different enough where you'd consider both (if you were limited to a small-ish shoe collection)?

    And to the poster above me: Great shots!
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2012
  3. 0ShinAkuma0

    0ShinAkuma0 Active Member

    Messages:
    35
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2012
    Location:
    Texas
    If you were limited to a small-ish shoe collection, then I'd say they don't differ enough to warrant both. The McTavish is slightly more bulky while the McAllister is sleeker. The McTavish is also more casual and maybe a bit more versatile, while the McAllister is slightly more formal but could still be used for some casual occasions. That's just my opinion though, someone else might want to chime in.
     
  4. mexicutioner

    mexicutioner Senior member

    Messages:
    1,154
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    Location:
    CA all day
    

    OOF those are tuff.

    ae REALLY needs to figure out a better way to showcase their shoes on the website. when i saw the neumoks online, i thought they looked stupid. after seeing them in person, i now own and love the brown neumoks, and your photos of the navy neumoks are calling my name.

    speaking of which:


    the AE website does NOT do the kenilworth justice. :inlove:
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2012
    1 person likes this.
  5. Olifter

    Olifter Senior member

    Messages:
    201
    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2012
    

    I agree that there is little difference between the McTavish and the Neumok. I am not sure I would get a brown or tan in either as that would be close to the walnut McAllister, though not as dressy. I suppose it depends on your specific needs and what you have already.
     
  6. MoneyWellSpent

    MoneyWellSpent Senior member

    Messages:
    2,372
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2012
  7. md2010

    md2010 Senior member

    Messages:
    1,894
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Location:
    Sydney
    
    The strand has wired sizing. I bought 8EEE and have 2 insoles. Where as my 5th street boots in 8.5D fits fine.
     
  8. MoneyWellSpent

    MoneyWellSpent Senior member

    Messages:
    2,372
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2012
    They do fill entirely different wardrobe niches though. Sure, they have the exact same broguing pattern, but the McAllister is a casual dress shoe. The McTavish is a dressy casual shoe. The McTavishes with their heavier leather and double soles are meant for denim or chinos while the McAllisters are still dress shoes for the office but on the more casual side due to their heavy broguing.
     
  9. Firefox

    Firefox Senior member

    Messages:
    343
    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2012
    Location:
    Toronto
    Just to bump the question above: Anyone know the answer? They look identical to me:

    Byron:
    [​IMG]

    Fifth Avenue:
    [​IMG]
     
  10. MoneyWellSpent

    MoneyWellSpent Senior member

    Messages:
    2,372
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2012
    I see no difference between them other than the lasts they are made on.
     
  11. 0ShinAkuma0

    0ShinAkuma0 Active Member

    Messages:
    35
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2012
    Location:
    Texas
    The only difference I see is the stitching that is parallel to the laces have different angles.
     
  12. kentyman

    kentyman Senior member

    Messages:
    760
    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2012
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    I think I'm leaning McTavish as well, but I'm having trouble deciding between Cognac, Natural, and Brown, in that order. I basically want an "everyday" sort of shoe to wear mainly with jeans or chinos. Brown seems the lamest from the AE website, but I can never trust that. Natural feels like it would be the most versatile, but I kinda like the red of the Cognac. If anyone has any pictures of these (especially compared to each other), that would really help. Short of that, I think I need to drive up to Dallas to see them in person.
     
  13. VinnyMac

    VinnyMac Senior member

    Messages:
    1,868
    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2012
    ...same here. Are they both leather soles?
     
  14. DJTraveler

    DJTraveler Senior member

    Messages:
    312
    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2012
    I am personally not a big fan of the double oak sole. It adds a bit more weight to the shoe of which I am not a big fan. Just my two cents.
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2012
  15. kentyman

    kentyman Senior member

    Messages:
    760
    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2012
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Honestly, that's my biggest hangup with them as well. Maybe that's all the more reason for me to see them in person first.
     
  16. Russell Lee

    Russell Lee Member

    Messages:
    8
    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2012
    Location:
    Notre Dame, IN
  17. DJTraveler

    DJTraveler Senior member

    Messages:
    312
    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2012
    I think the Cronmok and Aberdeen are terrific everyday shoes to wear with jeans or chinos. I have both and love them!
     
  18. fatback

    fatback New Member

    Messages:
    4
    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2012
    

    I was in a similar situation with trying to decide between the cognac and natural in the McTavish. I went to the AE store planning to buy the natural after looking at the pictures online. After seeing them and trying them on I ended up going with the cognac. I love the look of the natural, but I don't think it's as versatile as the cognac. To me the natural looks great with dark jeans with, but not as good with lighter pants. AE's website photos are terrible at accurately reflecting how their shoes look in person.
     
  19. atoms

    atoms Senior member

    Messages:
    265
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2012
    I have the natural McTavish. The cognac color is misleading on the AE photos. The natural have a hue leaning more towards "red" than a "baseball glove tan". I've applied a few coats of leather conditioner on them which slightly darkened them but not by much. I have this photo that shows them pretty well against some plain Levi's. Women haven't been shy in complementing them, they are somewhat attention grabbing. I only wear them with jeans or khaki pants. They take some getting used to given the double oak leather sole so check sizing carefully.

    [​IMG]

    Edit: I just read what fatback posted and we're definitely on the same page. They are really great shoes though if it's the look you're after.
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2012
  20. kentyman

    kentyman Senior member

    Messages:
    760
    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2012
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Thanks for the quick response, and presumably for going through the registration process just to reply. Welcome!

    Interesting, it sounds like the exact same situation. Now that you mention it, I can see how Natural might not work well with light chinos.

    I don't suppose you have a pic of your Cognacs with jeans that you think shows a representative color?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by