cincikid
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2012
- Messages
- 815
- Reaction score
- 69
I have them too and I like them a lot. Great casual shoe for the fall weather.
STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
I have them too and I like them a lot. Great casual shoe for the fall weather.
I embarrassingly realized that with all my recent travel, I forgot to email Allison and thank her. I also asked her about the new pattern. Here was here response:
Exciting that they may improve the pattern, and an excellent example of Allison's (and AE's in general) great customer support.
I ordered a few pairs of cedar shoe trees during the recent JAS sale ($8.50 a pair). I thought I would take a picture to compare the three different brands of trees I now have. I was surprised to see how noticeably wider the fixed trees (not sure what the proper term is) are compared to the split tree. All three are size L.
I am not intimately familiar with Carmina, so I don't know how their widths fit. I just figured if I didn't mention the EE width, someone else was going to.
Here's the problem with their options over all their lasts: I'm going to assume (though perhaps this is wrong) that they can't make each of their styles of shoe on any of those lasts. So, for example, their LWB can't be made on a narrow last, if its only made up for their extra wide last. So yeah, they have options, but if you want a pair of their boots, and they only come on a last that doesn't work for you at that width, you're out of luck. This is as opposed to AE who does a wonderful job of making their lasts available over the full range of widths.
Interesting. Thanks.The proper term is "full toe" for the ones that are fixed. When the split toe trees are inserted, they expand to fill the space appropriately. Thus, the wider forepart on the full toe trees makes sense, given they can't expand.
Interesting. Thanks.
Why would someone choose a full-toe versus the split-toe, or vice versa?
You are probably going to get several responses to that question. Personally, I think it comes down to individual preference. AE claims that the full-toe tree is better for AE models, and the split toe tree is better for "all other brands." I don't believe that, or see any reason why that would be true. All full-toe trees are the same shape, but AE's has many different shaped lasts. Unless they somehow used a computer to "average" out the shape to basically accommodate all their lasts to some degree, then it doesn't seem like it would matter.
I use full-toe trees because the split toe trees annoy me. Plain and simple.I find the split toe ones to be more finicky, and I always feel the need to reach inside the shoe to make sure they are fully expanded with my fingers, because they never seem to expand appropriately on their own. This may not be the case for everyone, but it's been my experience.
I realize this is the AE thread but will ask these questions since you seem to have a lot of experience with Carmina. I also hope that others in the thread would benefit from your response.The flaw in your argument is that, identical to Carmina, not all AE lasts work for all feet, regardless of the shoe's availability in different widths. I cannot wear the 8 last because a D width is perfect in the heel but too narrow at the ball of my foot. The E width in the 8 last is too wide in the heel and my foot swims in the shoe. Same problem with the 2 last for most people. There are also many with low volume feet that cannot wear the 5 last due to the bowing issue. Some cannot get a good fit with the 7 last, regardless of width.
With regard to Carmina, I will never get my foot in the Simpson and other narrow lasts, but the Rain, Inca and Forest lasts are almost identical in shape to the narrow lasts and work for wider feet.
I do agree with you, though, that an individual with an irregular width or other fit issue is much more likely to find a shoe that fits him at AE than at Carmina, due to the number of AE lasts and widths available.
It is interesting to me that we are only discussing Carmina vs. AE with regards to quality. For me, my major incentive to step up to Carmina is not the difference in the finishing, but the difference in the lasts. The stubby toe cap and extended welt on the Park Avenue and 5th Avenue can appear blobby, which is why I began looking elsewhere for my cap toes. When I justify the price increase to go outside AE's offering, it is to obtain a sleeker shoe on a last that fits my foot as well or better than AE. When it comes to more casual shoes, I can't see myself going outside of AE.
You are probably going to get several responses to that question. Personally, I think it comes down to individual preference. AE claims that the full-toe tree is better for AE models, and the split toe tree is better for "all other brands." I don't believe that, or see any reason why that would be true. All full-toe trees are the same shape, but AE's has many different shaped lasts. Unless they somehow used a computer to "average" out the shape to basically accommodate all their lasts to some degree, then it doesn't seem like it would matter.
I use full-toe trees because the split toe trees annoy me. Plain and simple. I find the split toe ones to be more finicky, and I always feel the need to reach inside the shoe to make sure they are fully expanded with my fingers, because they never seem to expand appropriately on their own. This may not be the case for everyone, but it's been my experience.