Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread 2019 - News, Pictures, Clothing, Accessories, etc.

[wasmisterfu]

If my “designer” dressed like that, I’d look for a new designer.

Yeah, I’m with you on this. If you wear ridiculous looking clown shoes, your status as a “designer” is entirely suspect.

Oh hell, I’ve had a few too many and it’s way to hot to be nice. So I’m just gonna burn this muhf_cker down: the dude, complete with his sequined shorts, looks like a marsupialed attention-whore. Not an SF peacock, not an avant-garde type; just a tacky, clown-shoe wearing moron with absolutely no taste.

 

[wasmisterfu]

Disregard the floating shelf. The [expletive deleted] lazy [expletive deleted] who built our house apparently felt the need to triple-up areas of sheetrock for the walls. So the stud finder registered false positives and now i get to replace a whole [expletive deleted] wall.

So that was an entire weekend wasted.

Oh, we must have the same builder!

 

[armedferret]

Oh, we must have the same builder!

Ryan Homes. Nationwide purveyors of cut corners (just not any of them 90*, mind you....seriously ZERO right angles anywhere in this house....EVERYTHING is crooked--just like the builder), code violations, and paid-off building inspectors everywhere hastily-built profiteering occurs.

 

[wasmisterfu]

Ryan Homes. Nationwide purveyors of cut corners (just not any of them 90*, mind you....seriously ZERO right angles anywhere in this house....EVERYTHING is crooked--just like the builder), code violations, and paid-off building inspectors everywhere hastily-built profiteering occurs.

Okay, maybe my house isn’t that bad after all.

 

[stook1]

Would something like this bug you guys or am I obsessing over irrelevencies? These are a pair of older Macneils.

 

[mreams99]

Would something like this bug you guys or am I obsessing over irrelevencies? These are a pair of older Macneils.

View attachment 1210285

That would not bother me.

 

[audog]

Would something like this bug you guys or am I obsessing over irrelevencies? These are a pair of older Macneils.

View attachment 1210285

wouldn't bother me, and the only people who would notice anyway, have already seen your photo post

 

[stook1]

wouldn't bother me, and the only people who would notice anyway, have already seen your photo post

Hahahah. Indeed. I guess I am more OCD than I realized. Either that or I am looking for excuses to not buy another pair of shoes!

 

[madhat]

Would something like this bug you guys or am I obsessing over irrelevencies? These are a pair of older Macneils.

View attachment 1210285

What's the issue? *wink*

 

[wasmisterfu]

Would something like this bug you guys or am I obsessing over irrelevencies? These are a pair of older Macneils.

View attachment 1210285

Are the firsts or seconds? If seconds, I wouldn’t care. If full priced firsts, that’d not be acceptable in my book.

The big question is, does it bother you? Only you can answer that question.

 

[wasmisterfu]

My poor ugly Mac’s get few wears now.
View attachment 1210114

Why you say those ugly?

 

[stook1]

That's my perspective as well. They appear to be firsts, although used. I'm not sure how much it would bother me. Looking at a zoomed in photo it bothers me. On foot, I suspect it's not obvious.

Are the firsts or seconds? If seconds, I wouldn’t care. If full priced firsts, that’d not be acceptable in my book.

The big question is, does it bother you? Only you can answer that question.

 

[ProfilaBinding]

If those were firsts, I might return and exchange. It's borderline in my book, although it's not going to be noticed from a distance.

 

[wasmisterfu]

That's my perspective as well. They appear to be firsts, although used. I'm not sure how much it would bother me. Looking at a zoomed in photo it bothers me. On foot, I suspect it's not obvious.

How much are we talking for these shoes. Got any additional photos (full shoes, linings, soles)?

 

[Shoenut]

What's the issue? *wink*

I think that is the planned mistake they make on every pair.