Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread 2016 - News, Pictures, Sizing, Accessories, Clothing, etc

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by watchidiot, Feb 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. danwatts2005

    danwatts2005 Senior member

    Messages:
    382
    Likes Received:
    153
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2015
    Location:
    Dyer, IN
    

    Here's my take. I know a lot of people like them, but they replaced a better shoe. The brown is funny looking to me, and the leather isn't as nice as the Rush Street. I like the style, and I like the 65, but to me, the Strandmok is a cheap miss. Just my opinion.
     
  2. alexnb

    alexnb Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    14
    Joined:
    May 11, 2015
    Agreed. If the leather was nicer I would buy them too... all they do for me is make me want the rush street that much more.
     
  3. MattRiv

    MattRiv Senior member

    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    751
    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2015
    I got mine off ebay for < $80. I love them and are easily my most complimented shoes, which is probably because it's kind of a unique casual shoe and my other AEs are somewhat "standard" looking dress shoes. They are also durable as shit, but you will rub the brown burnish off over time, so be prepared for that tan to come through.
     
  4. ace13x

    ace13x Senior member

    Messages:
    2,015
    Likes Received:
    1,379
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2015
    One of the reasons I didn't pick up those Odenwald's in Brown yesterday. They only had a small bit of tan highlighting the tips, and looked great. But I don't think I could hope to keep them looking like that for long.
     
  5. M635Guy

    M635Guy Senior member

    Messages:
    2,313
    Likes Received:
    1,470
    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2015
    Location:
    Cary, NC
    I dunno - the blue and especially the olive Strandmok are fairly tempting for me. If it weren't for the fact that this particular shoe pattern in the form of my 11.5D Rush Street fits me poorly (even though my other 5-last shoes are very good or great) I'd be really tempted to have a pair of the Strandmoks. I went by the AE store to see if I could dial in a size specifically for that shoe, and I just don't get great closure in a D or an E in these shoes, and sizing up in either width just isn't a fit. But frankly my Rush Streets constrain my pinky toe and sorta make my feet tired. The leather seemed much nicer than what they use on the Neumok too. It ain't the CXL (which is what I like about my Rush Streets), but I think the two on-line-only colors are really cool.

    The SA suggested I take my Rush Streets to my sorta-local AE (which is an outlet) and they can stretch them. I'm going to see if my feet will do some of that work.

    If I did buy the Strandmok, I'd use the sale price to order either the v-tread or leather sole option...
     
  6. M635Guy

    M635Guy Senior member

    Messages:
    2,313
    Likes Received:
    1,470
    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2015
    Location:
    Cary, NC
    BTW - I sometimes wonder how much of the tiredness I feel from my Rush Sts. is from the Dainite sole - anyone else think that is a bit of an unforgiving platform?
     
  7. ultravisitor

    ultravisitor Senior member

    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    30
    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2014
    The Dainite sole of my Clark Streets has never bothered me.
     
  8. mosy

    mosy Senior member

    Messages:
    1,006
    Likes Received:
    209
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2014
    Hi, yes I measured both. I am actually an 8.5 in heel to toe and 9 in heel to ball. So 9.5 would be too long. Thanks for the idea though.
     
  9. MattRiv

    MattRiv Senior member

    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    751
    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2015
    

    It's not overly easy to scuff the burnish off, but it will happen and I believe is supposed to. I think it adds character to the shoe myself, but can look odd if you scratch it off in a straight line, otherwise it's like reverse antiquing.
     
    Last edited: Apr 19, 2016
  10. mosy

    mosy Senior member

    Messages:
    1,006
    Likes Received:
    209
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2014
    Yes blucher is better, as I can tie a bit looser. On the bal I can also technically tie looser; however I don't like too much of a gap in the v.

    The shoes are definitely not too short in length (I am only an 8.5 in heel to toe). The only area of tightness is that specific spot on the outside of my arch area. I'm hoping they will loosen up, as I really like the oxfords on the 65 (PA, Strands, FA, etc).
     
  11. mosy

    mosy Senior member

    Messages:
    1,006
    Likes Received:
    209
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2014
    I'm hoping someone can answer:

    How does the 108 last compare with the 65 in terms of sizing? Do most go with the same size for both?
     
  12. FaRKle

    FaRKle Senior member

    Messages:
    387
    Likes Received:
    358
    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2015
    I just bought a Carlyle this weekend. To me, the 108 was surprisingly roomy. I had been under the impression that it was a very narrow and tight fitting last all around. Compared to the 65 last though, I found it MUCH better for a higher instep. The width at the ball of the foot wasn't lacking, although it was slightly more narrow than the 65 last. My toes didn't feel cramped at all and the volume above the ball of the foot seemed to be a bit more than the 65 last, which can feel tight from the ball of the foot all the way up to the instep. Length-wise seemed to fit the same as the 65 last.

    With the 65 last I have to go 7.5EEE for bals, which end up being slightly long (heel doesn't grab all that well in the back), and ever so slightly wide at the ball of the foot (have to wear medium weight socks to get snug). If I wear a 7EEE, then the instep is painful, however, with 65 last bluchers it's perfect. With the Carlyles (and wearing thin socks), a 7.5EEE was comfortable in the ball of the foot such that going to a 7EEE should still be just right. I was able to lace the sides of the bal all the way up without feeling loose or firm pressure over my instep. The heel wasn't quite as wide as the 65 last, so it grabbed slightly better, but the length was the same as the 5 last, which is a bit too long for me. I went with a 7EEE in the Carlyles and expect them to fit very well.
     
    Last edited: Apr 19, 2016
  13. Neo1

    Neo1 Senior member

    Messages:
    1,509
    Likes Received:
    561
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2015
    @FaRKle From what you described, you owe it to yourself to try the 201 & 222 if you haven't already.
     
  14. harlequin782

    harlequin782 Senior member

    Messages:
    512
    Likes Received:
    125
    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2012
    

    I'm getting them...they're a much better casual shoe than the Elgin or Rush Street from what I've seen of them at the store. The AE rep at my local store said that in her experience, it was one of the most liked styles compared to their other casual offerings. The suede versions are super soft, but can tend to look like a tennis shoe from certain angles to me.
     
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2016
  15. feeble

    feeble Active Member

    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    15
    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2015
    

    I have the terra Dallas Le marche, will post a pic of it in khakis today after I get to the office
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by