• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • We would like to welcome House of Huntington as an official Affiliate Vendor. Shop past season Drake's, Nigel Cabourn, Private White V.C. and other menswear luxury brands at exceptional prices below retail. Please visit the Houise of Huntington thread and welcome them to the forum.

  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Paul Sargent (formerly Alfred Sargent) Appreciation Thread

ShooIn

Senior Member
Joined
May 16, 2016
Messages
177
Reaction score
338
Are these full grain leather? Is the quality on par with AS exclusive?
Nice full grain leather. There are a number of differences , the most noticable are the tighter waist and hidden channel stitching with the Exclusive range. I don't think the soles are Oak-bark tanned either. The Henry II are a small step down in quality and detailing, but I love the shape of the 109 last and wear them often.
 

Trusar

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2019
Messages
49
Reaction score
21
Nice full grain leather. There are a number of differences , the most noticable are the tighter waist and hidden channel stitching with the Exclusive range. I don't think the soles are Oak-bark tanned either. The Henry II are a small step down in quality and detailing, but I love the shape of the 109 last and wear them often.
Thanks for the reply, main thing I'm worried about is the leather, Is the leather the same? I have a pair coming on Monday.
 

ShooIn

Senior Member
Joined
May 16, 2016
Messages
177
Reaction score
338
No idea if it is the same but I don't think you will be disappointed, full grain and it takes a lovely shine. I have C&J and G&G as well as AS exclusive and these certainly compare well.
 

Trusar

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2019
Messages
49
Reaction score
21
OK thanks.
Im getting the Henry 2 like the pic you put.
Thanks a lot. Can't wait till Monday
 

dukenukem4ever

Distinguished Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2019
Messages
1,180
Reaction score
871
OK thanks.
Im getting the Henry 2 like the pic you put.
Thanks a lot. Can't wait till Monday

Herring Royal Collection (Henry II, Charles II, etc...) are all based off of the Alfred Sargent 109 F last which is a part of its Exclusive collection.

In terms of leather quality, the leather used as part of the "Royal Collection" is the best in its collection (its Premier line is mainly produced by Joseph Cheaney, still a smidgen below Alfred Sargent).

I don't know how to quantitatively measure the leather quality but I can say (owning the Charles II (a cap toe balmoral copy of the Armfields without the swan neck stitching) and Edward II semi-brogue) that the leather used is definitely quite beautiful, supple and easy to maintain and shine.

You won't be disappointed by them. Yes, the Royal Collection manufactured by Alfred Sargent does not feature closed-channel stitching, oak-bark tanned leather soles and like ShooIn noted, its waist is not as narrow / tight but only by a hair to be honest. Hardly noticeable. Still, all the Royal Collection shoes are on the 109 last which is beautiful in my opinion.
 

Trusar

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2019
Messages
49
Reaction score
21
the leather seems thin cardboard like and rigid.

is this normal?
 

Trusar

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2019
Messages
49
Reaction score
21
maybe it will soffen up after conditioning and moisturising several times.
 

Trusar

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2019
Messages
49
Reaction score
21
the leather reminds me of the leather used by Crockett and jones in their handgrade line.
the only difference is this is rigid and C & J handgrade is flexible.
When i went to the C & J store i tried on the fairford and it was also very thin leather, but flexible, and look very similar to me.
 

Trusar

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2019
Messages
49
Reaction score
21
My right foot is longer by about 5mm but for some reason the right shoe seems a bit looser from the back. I'll try it again tomorrow evening. I haven't been on my feet much today. The last pic is after cream polish
IMG_20200406_171021.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20200406_171545.jpg
    IMG_20200406_171545.jpg
    254 KB · Views: 41
  • IMG_20200406_171454.jpg
    IMG_20200406_171454.jpg
    255.5 KB · Views: 54
  • IMG_20200406_171445.jpg
    IMG_20200406_171445.jpg
    113.4 KB · Views: 58
  • IMG_20200406_171009.jpg
    IMG_20200406_171009.jpg
    231.1 KB · Views: 60
  • IMG_20200406_171003.jpg
    IMG_20200406_171003.jpg
    225.8 KB · Views: 59
  • IMG_20200406_170945.jpg
    IMG_20200406_170945.jpg
    147.7 KB · Views: 64
  • IMG_20200406_114309.jpg
    IMG_20200406_114309.jpg
    171.9 KB · Views: 61
  • IMG_20200406_114235.jpg
    IMG_20200406_114235.jpg
    227.2 KB · Views: 83
  • 15861905621568536155622136480560.jpg
    15861905621568536155622136480560.jpg
    178.6 KB · Views: 83

Trusar

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2019
Messages
49
Reaction score
21
If you zoom in on some of the close ups, you can see not only the grain structure but also the hole where the hair folical was, loads of small holes. I belove this is a good sign.
 

Luigi_M

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2017
Messages
2,200
Reaction score
3,194
I can say nothing about the fit (you have to feel it by yourself), but the leather seems the same of my own Alfred Sargents.
It may feel somehow hard at the beginning, but if you wear them for some time to break in, and give your shoes some love (a conditioner like Bick4 and some good cream - all very sparingly) you will quickly find yourself with a really fine and comfortable pair of shoes.
Of course you already know that (like all nice shoes) they deserve good shoe trees and frequent brushing.
Enjoy them in good health!
 

LPMIII

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 12, 2015
Messages
50
Reaction score
41
I can say nothing about the fit (you have to feel it by yourself), but the leather seems the same of my own Alfred Sargents.
It may feel somehow hard at the beginning, but if you wear them for some time to break in, and give your shoes some love (a conditioner like Bick4 and some good cream - all very sparingly) you will quickly find yourself with a really fine and comfortable pair of shoes.
Of course you already know that (like all nice shoes) they deserve good shoe trees and frequent brushing.
Enjoy them in good health!

I have had this issue with a pair of factory second Armfields; I suspect they may have been sitting on a shelf for a while. I used a few light applications of Bick 4, giving them ample time to absorb it between applications.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 55 35.5%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 60 38.7%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 17 11.0%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 27 17.4%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 28 18.1%

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
505,159
Messages
10,578,931
Members
223,882
Latest member
anykadaimeni
Top