• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

A technical question re: silk and textiles

lukejackson

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
709
Reaction score
277
Hi guys,

I saw a documentary on hand weaving with looms with sparked my interest in reading up on it. I've been reading a lot about silks and wondered if anyone could clarify things. Most of the material I've read concerns silk production, weaving etc. but most of it is not geared towards the use of silk for fashion apparel.

So, obviously there seems to be a preference to Italian/English/French silk in the (luxury) clothing and apparel industry. However, reading about textiles in other industries, many seem to consider Indian and Thai silk exemplary. Given that almost all raw silk comes from India or China (I believe), I assume it is the weaving process which results in differences in quality. So is it true that, for example, silks from Como will be substantially better than a silk woven in India or Thailand?

Is it simply because much of the Italian industry is geared towards producing for the fashion industry, thus they ensure the mm etc. is appropriate for clothing? Or is it a stigma attached to production in developing countries and the belief that quality will not be superior? I guess, in essence, I'm asking what (apparently) makes silks woven in Italy or England so much better, given that I have read Como itself produces weaving machinery that is exported overseas. Also, considering that much of the process is run by software, I assumed consistency across the board would have been reached.


TL,DR notes: Why is silk from Italy, England etc. so much better? Or is it simply a stigma attached to silks from developing countries that has induced this assumption.
 

Sam Hober

Distinguished Member
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
1,463
Reaction score
471

Hi guys,

I saw a documentary on hand weaving with looms with sparked my interest in reading up on it. I've been reading a lot about silks and wondered if anyone could clarify things. Most of the material I've read concerns silk production, weaving etc. but most of it is not geared towards the use of silk for fashion apparel.

So, obviously there seems to be a preference to Italian/English/French silk in the (luxury) clothing and apparel industry. However, reading about textiles in other industries, many seem to consider Indian and Thai silk exemplary. Given that almost all raw silk comes from India or China (I believe), I assume it is the weaving process which results in differences in quality. So is it true that, for example, silks from Como will be substantially better than a silk woven in India or Thailand?

Is it simply because much of the Italian industry is geared towards producing for the fashion industry, thus they ensure the mm etc. is appropriate for clothing? Or is it a stigma attached to production in developing countries and the belief that quality will not be superior? I guess, in essence, I'm asking what (apparently) makes silks woven in Italy or England so much better, given that I have read Como itself produces weaving machinery that is exported overseas. Also, considering that much of the process is run by software, I assumed consistency across the board would have been reached.


TL,DR notes: Why is silk from Italy, England etc. so much better? Or is it simply a stigma attached to silks from developing countries that has induced this assumption.


Brazil also produces raw silk for export.

China does not focus on quality currently but in the distant past wove beautiful silk and probably will again in the future.

Italian fabric has a wonderful finish which is probably its biggest claim to fame.

The handwoven silk that you hear about in India and Thailand is typically different not better or worse than Italian silk.

We have woven silk in Thailand that is rough with slubs and we have woven smooth silk. It depends on what you want to accomplish.

If you want smooth silk then it is a good idea to start with smooth machine reeled silk. Hand reeled silk is often going to have slubs.
 

lukejackson

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
709
Reaction score
277
Brazil also produces raw silk for export.

China does not focus on quality currently but in the distant past wove beautiful silk and probably will again in the future.

Italian fabric has a wonderful finish which is probably its biggest claim to fame.

The handwoven silk that you hear about in India and Thailand is typically different not better or worse than Italian silk.

We have woven silk in Thailand that is rough with slubs and we have woven smooth silk. It depends on what you want to accomplish.

If you want smooth silk then it is a good idea to start with smooth machine reeled silk. Hand reeled silk is often going to have slubs.
Cheers. What still confuses me is why other nations cannot achieve the same quality of weave if they are (as some articles have told me) using the same or similar machinery. I'm thinking the attention to quality just isn't there, and perhaps they cut corners, where as production in Italy does not.

Thanks for the help though. I'm sure there is reading material out there, I just can't find it!
 

Sam Hober

Distinguished Member
Dubiously Honored
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
1,463
Reaction score
471

Cheers. What still confuses me is why other nations cannot achieve the same quality of weave if they are (as some articles have told me) using the same or similar machinery. I'm thinking the attention to quality just isn't there, and perhaps they cut corners, where as production in Italy does not.

Thanks for the help though. I'm sure there is reading material out there, I just can't find it!


Actually you are not confused - you have the answer - attention to quality.

But I would judge at the company level not the nation level as there will always be exceptions.

Not all fabrics in Italy or England are first rate.

Some thoughts:

Tradition is important

Education is very important

Pride in what you do means a lot.

Having fun with the creative process really helps.

If China wanted to create world class silks and ties it could - remember in the past they were luxury weavers of silk.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 76 36.4%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 77 36.8%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 23 11.0%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 35 16.7%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 35 16.7%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,142
Messages
10,586,585
Members
224,122
Latest member
HieroGriff
Top