• Hi, I am the owner and main administrator of Styleforum. If you find the forum useful and fun, please help support it by buying through the posted links on the forum. Our main, very popular sales thread, where the latest and best sales are listed, are posted HERE

    Purchases made through some of our links earns a commission for the forum and allows us to do the work of maintaining and improving it. Finally, thanks for being a part of this community. We realize that there are many choices today on the internet, and we have all of you to thank for making Styleforum the foremost destination for discussions of menswear.
  • This site contains affiliate links for which Styleforum may be compensated.
  • STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.

    Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.

    Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!

    Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

$500 bucks - suggest a versatile shoe

nmprisons

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
1,299
Reaction score
176
I have plenty of balmoral lace-ups, but it turns out I will be wearing shirt and tie sans suit more than I thought. Unfortunately, I generally dislike the look of blutchers and don't even own a pair. Any thoughts on a balmoral that won't look too dressy without a suit or a blutcher that doesn't look so clunky? I don't want to spend more than $500 if I don't have to.

Thanks
 

fox in sox

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2007
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
What about monk straps? Something like the C&J Savile ordered from Plal would definitely be within your budget.
 

ChicagoRon

Distinguished Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
6,147
Reaction score
161
The Ferragamo Tramezza blucher is not clunky. It is burgundy, I don't know if that's an issue for you.

There is also a very nice burgundy Weston bal that is pretty casual looking.

Unfortunately, retail prices for both of those are over $500, but maybe on sale.....

I agree with the C&J monkstrap suggestion, or also a nice pair of loafers. I have EG Sloanes that you can get from SkyValet for about $600 and I love them.
 

Mr T

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
858
Reaction score
1
Originally Posted by Aluan
Brown suede balmorals, maybe?

Good call. Look at AE's suede balmoral wingtip Mcclain on discount. I just picked up a pair from STP and find them perfect for biz casual.
 

grimslade

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
10,806
Reaction score
82
How about a sleek plain toe two-eyelet blucher in brown?
 

moonman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2007
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
+1 on the monkstraps. Kind of finds the sweet spot between formal and casual. Catches peoples eye. I receive more compliments on my C&J Saviles than any of my other shoes.

Also +1 on the suede bals. I have a pair of the suede C&J Belgraves and love 'em.

Plal.com is your friend. Highly recommended.
 

rjmaiorano

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
2,204
Reaction score
1
I like monks for a more casual look. Certainly can't go wrong with suede either.

But to be honest, the sleek two-eyelet blucher suggested by grimslade is a style I love and is probably the most versatile of the three styles.
 

Gus

Stylish Dinosaur
Dubiously Honored
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2007
Messages
18,580
Reaction score
8,077
I would suggest double monks in a nice brown. Double monks have a certain flair about them that gives them flexibility. You can wear them with a suit or out to a club with jeans.

In a whole different direction, how about a brown suede cap-toe oxford. They are far more versatile than most people think. They look great with navy, gray & khaki.
 

crazyquik

Distinguished Member
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
8,984
Reaction score
44
tassel loafer
 

grimslade

Stylish Dinosaur
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
10,806
Reaction score
82
I only own one pair of monks, and I haven't had them long, so maybe I'm just not feeling the love. But I think of monks as less versatile because they stand out more, with all that flashy metal, etc.
 

Fade to Black

Distinguished Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2006
Messages
2,736
Reaction score
1
Alden plain toe cordovan bluchers...and i think they're exactly $500 at retail. Most versatile dress shoe ever.
 

nmprisons

Distinguished Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
1,299
Reaction score
176
Thanks for the suggestions. No offense, but I can't imagine ever wearing a loafer. I will look into the monkstrap idea.

Are brown calfskin wingtips balmorals fine with a shirt and tie or are they still considered too dressy?
 

Manton

RINO
Joined
Apr 20, 2002
Messages
41,314
Reaction score
2,879
Originally Posted by grimslade
I only own one pair of monks, and I haven't had them long, so maybe I'm just not feeling the love. But I think of monks as less versatile because they stand out more, with all that flashy metal, etc.

It's one little buckle.
rolleyes.gif


OP: monk is the answer.
 

Featured Sponsor

How important is full vs half canvas to you for heavier sport jackets?

  • Definitely full canvas only

    Votes: 91 37.8%
  • Half canvas is fine

    Votes: 89 36.9%
  • Really don't care

    Votes: 25 10.4%
  • Depends on fabric

    Votes: 40 16.6%
  • Depends on price

    Votes: 38 15.8%

Forum statistics

Threads
506,830
Messages
10,592,085
Members
224,322
Latest member
davidcameron01
Top