STYLE. COMMUNITY. GREAT CLOTHING.
Bored of counting likes on social networks? At Styleforum, you’ll find rousing discussions that go beyond strings of emojis.
Click Here to join Styleforum's thousands of style enthusiasts today!
Styleforum is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Damn, can we stop comparing these to eidos? Let the homie break free
The inseam measurements are slightly misleading as the rise is substantially longer than most pants that have a 30-32” inseam. I’m roughly 6’4” and wear the L. They sit on my hips with a belt and have a slightly drop crotch, slightly cropped look. This is the intention. If we extend the inseam we would need to shorten the rise. The biggest issue is getting across the concept of alteration at this price point. We deliberately designed the pant with a split back waist band so that taking the waist in would be easy if a slouched look is not something that works for you. Most of the returns have just said they are too big in the waist.
These are probably floating around so sorry for being lazy, but do you have any pictures of you in them?
We're the same height and I've shied away from your pants because I assumed they were too short.
Here’s the army cord and the khadi twill. The picture of Sudan that we used on the product page really nails it though. He’s 6’2 or 3 and wearing a medium. They’re roomy through the waist so they fall to his hips (plumber’s crack is only a problem if you wear short shirts and no underwear...). I think this looks great. The comment about relaxing about how clothes fit is valid in my mind. Too many people - and many that frequent this site - treat getting dressed like a math equation they can solve. And it shows. I would actually argue that this mentality is a big part of what killed tailoring, spawning normcore and brands like vetements. Many of the guys wearing this stuff were wearing sport coats and knit ties in 2013.
View attachment 1119397 View attachment 1119398 View attachment 1119399
Looking forward to that! Thanks!No restocks but that pant is coming in lots more fabrics in the next couple drops.
You’ll see that jacket coming next fall in a custom milled Donegal tweed from Molloy and Sons...
Here’s the army cord and the khadi twill. The picture of Sudan that we used on the product page really nails it though. He’s 6’2 or 3 and wearing a medium. They’re roomy through the waist so they fall to his hips (plumber’s crack is only a problem if you wear short shirts and no underwear...). I think this looks great. The comment about relaxing about how clothes fit is valid in my mind. Too many people - and many that frequent this site - treat getting dressed like a math equation they can solve. And it shows. I would actually argue that this mentality is a big part of what killed tailoring, spawning normcore and brands like vetements. Many of the guys wearing this stuff were wearing sport coats and knit ties in 2013.
View attachment 1119397 View attachment 1119398 View attachment 1119399
Here’s the army cord and the khadi twill. The picture of Sudan that we used on the product page really nails it though. He’s 6’2 or 3 and wearing a medium. They’re roomy through the waist so they fall to his hips (plumber’s crack is only a problem if you wear short shirts and no underwear...). I think this looks great. The comment about relaxing about how clothes fit is valid in my mind. Too many people - and many that frequent this site - treat getting dressed like a math equation they can solve. And it shows. I would actually argue that this mentality is a big part of what killed tailoring, spawning normcore and brands like vetements. Many of the guys wearing this stuff were wearing sport coats and knit ties in 2013.
View attachment 1119397 View attachment 1119398 View attachment 1119399
Is there anyone here that normally wears size 34 pants that has the pajama pants? what size do you have? and what is the inseam?
thanks
(plumber’s crack is only a problem if you wear short shirts and no underwear...).
Through drop three this silhouette was designed to be worn low on the hips, not the natural waist (though with the split-back waistband, they can easily be brought in if that's your preference). As a lifelong skater, it's how I've worn any pants that weren't "trousers" for basically my whole life. That said, just got out of the fitting tweaked the fit going forward to be a more standard tts waist going forward.