OK, so we all know that aside from wine, everything was better during some arbitrary period in the past than it is now. Right?
So why bother with Uniqlo clothes from 2017 when you can grab something from the Japanese juggernaut that isn't from 2017? I don't know for sure if the quality of their clothes was better back then, but I hear things; yes, I hear from people that this might very well be the case. Terrific.
These "regular" fit jeans don't just have the honor of being from a time that isn't 2017; they're also brand new with the factory tags.
Appropriately described by Uniqlo as "Black," these jeans are their famous (?) regular straight-cut, which is code for "won't crush your junk, but won't fit like 1940s dress pants."
And just a "heads up": If you're digging the shape of these pants, but black isn't really your color, I've also got a pair of grey charcoal colored jeans in the same cut (REGULAR STRAIGHT) and condition (FREAKING BRAND NEW WITH TAGS)
Approximate measurements
Waist: 17"
Rise: 10.5"
Inseam: 32"
Leg Opening: 7.75"
So why bother with Uniqlo clothes from 2017 when you can grab something from the Japanese juggernaut that isn't from 2017? I don't know for sure if the quality of their clothes was better back then, but I hear things; yes, I hear from people that this might very well be the case. Terrific.
These "regular" fit jeans don't just have the honor of being from a time that isn't 2017; they're also brand new with the factory tags.
Appropriately described by Uniqlo as "Black," these jeans are their famous (?) regular straight-cut, which is code for "won't crush your junk, but won't fit like 1940s dress pants."
And just a "heads up": If you're digging the shape of these pants, but black isn't really your color, I've also got a pair of grey charcoal colored jeans in the same cut (REGULAR STRAIGHT) and condition (FREAKING BRAND NEW WITH TAGS)
Approximate measurements
Waist: 17"
Rise: 10.5"
Inseam: 32"
Leg Opening: 7.75"