1. Welcome to the new Styleforum!

    We hope you’re as excited as we are to hang out in the new place. There are more new features that we’ll announce in the near future, but for now we hope you’ll enjoy the new site.

    We are currently fine-tuning the forum for your browsing pleasure, so bear with any lingering dust as we work to make Styleforum even more awesome than it was.

    Oh, and don’t forget to head over to the Styleforum Journal, because we’re giving away two pairs of Carmina shoes to celebrate our move!

    Please address any questions about using the new forum to support@styleforum.net

    Cheers,

    The Styleforum Team

    Dismiss Notice

The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Brei

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by gdl203, May 20, 2007.

Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dopey

    dopey Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    14,577
    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2006
    Oh. That is still a little sporty for more formal business suits, but not too much and not a big deal. I would certainly be ok wearing it to the office, but would wear a cleaner, more elegant watch for something in a more formal setting.
     
  2. Ilovelobbs

    Ilovelobbs Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    687
    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2013
    Thank you DINO - your insight and opinion much appreciated. Happy to return the favour if you need any advice on high end-shoes.

    As promised, the Montblanc I wore into London today..

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  3. Allez Allez

    Allez Allez Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    156
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    Scott - how about just a good old Rolex Datejust? I started out with that and I bet a lot of people do. It goes great with a suit and great with shorts.

    Some people will say its a sport watch or a tool watch and you shouldn't wear it with a suit. But I think that is a pretty narrow view.

    FWIW, I don't care for two tone watches. But that's just a personal preference.
     
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2013
  4. Allez Allez

    Allez Allez Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    156
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    
    I was referring to Scott. But good tip.
     
  5. ggtk

    ggtk Active Member

    Messages:
    37
    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2010
    Location:
    10601
    Definitely the XL
     
  6. in stitches

    in stitches Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    68,895
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Location:
    Charm City
    

    no its not. its not congruent. either you care or you dont, no one will arrest you.
     
  7. no frills

    no frills Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,204
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2013
    Location:
    NYC
    I generally agree with this statement, although you'll want to consider dial design, formality of the strap versus bracelet, the precious metal used to make the watch, the height of the watch (does it slip discreetly into your formal jacket's cuff?) and your own personal preferences.

    I like 36mm, and I think this particular watch of mine, for example, straddles the balance between formal wear (business suits, tuxedoes) and casual (weekend wear, shirt/jeans). Indeed, the case size is 36mm!


    [​IMG]


    1. Dial design: the balance of various subdials given the perpetual calendar complication renders it for me quite appealing for formal wear, but the chronograph function gives it a "sporty" edge that goes well with casual wear.

    2. Formality of strap versus bracelet: Leather straps are pretty flexible for me, perfectly at home in formal settings but also acceptable for casual wear. This one is in black but I think if it came in brown that might work even better for casual wear - but maybe not for black tie events.

    3. Precious metal: This piece is made of platinum, which tends to fly under the radar (which I like). Depending on the finishing some people can't even distinguish it from stainless steel. That gives it the "sporty" edge for me that allows me to wear it with casual stuff - yellow gold might not go as well with ripped jeans. This one (for me) works just fine.

    4. Height of the watch: This is where the 13mm height of this 3970P can be hit or miss. It is arguable that the sub-9mm height of the Patek 3940 is better for formal wear. But the extra heft and height delivered by the chrono movement (I have yet to see an "ultra thin chronograph") appeals to me for casual wear, while the watch is just short enough to slip under my (formal) jacket's cuff. Any taller/thicker/meatier and I think I'd be uncomfortable pairing this with formal wear.

    5. Personal preference: Hey. At the end of the day the above reasons justify my use of this watch for both formal and casual wear. These are my reasons. It's perfectly fine if you disagree with me and if you think my reasoning is bullsh*t and my sense of style sucks.


    [​IMG]

    I will keep on happily wearing this watch. [​IMG]

    Hey, I wear my perpetual calendar chronos with a beat up Uniqlo undershirt (two for $12.99 baby). Can't get more casual than that I suppose, unless I took my shirt off. Standard "Frills shot" (according to Newcomer) below. [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2013
  8. ExhibitA

    ExhibitA Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    164
    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2012
    Location:
    Miami Beach, Florida, USA
    I must say, the Omega Speedmaster is the best watch I've seen on a leather strap. it's better than on the OEM stainless steel bracelet. Rolex is just the opposite. It's better on the original braclet than on a nato or leather strap.
     
  9. Quarks

    Quarks Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    221
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2011
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    1 person likes this.
  10. Newcomer

    Newcomer Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,073
    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    

    I tried to swing the Frills shot, but unfortunately, I think you have me beat on it :worship:

    I think you are correct in saying that your 3970P can play in between casual and formal wear. And it is a very interesting observation. The pushers really "casualize" the piece, but by no means would I say that it does not remain, at heart, a dressier watch.

    I have been thinking more and more about how complications relate to one another within a watch. I guess when Dino spoke about how he appreciates the history-design interplay (sorry for my crude, crude explanation), it got me thinking about the 'purity' of a watch.

    The perpetual calendar chronograph really is fascinating in that respect. It is amazing to think that it measures seconds, minutes, hours, days of the week, days of the month, phases of the moon, months, and the year. It really is a poetic set of complications. Similarly, that is one of the reasons I am very attracted to my MUT Moon. It tracks the days of the month, and the phases of the moon--both complications relate only to the month. In a similar vein, this is what bothers me about watches like the Omega Speedmaster Moonphase, or the Big Pilot Perpetual Calendar. In the case of the former, you are pairing arguably the most sedentary and poetic complications with the most erratic. In the case of the latter, you are taking a pilot's watch, which is all about being "of the moment," and placing a complication that is completely irrelevant to its primary purpose.

    One of the more interesting watches I have seen as of late has been the Habring2 Foudroyante with Secondes de Mort. What a fascinating combination!

    Just a couple of the evening thoughts.
     
  11. ChicagoRon

    ChicagoRon Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,217
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2007
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    If I bought that PP 3970P I couldn't afford to go to any formal events anymore... It would look great on my wrist as I sit at home eating ramen noodles and watching Wife Swap reruns, though :slayer:
     
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2013
  12. in stitches

    in stitches Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    68,895
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Location:
    Charm City
    

    that sounds just like my retirement plan when i refi my house to buy a high complication PP.
     
  13. DLJr

    DLJr Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,655
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2011
    Location:
    Philly Burbs
    If I catch you at a black tie event and that watch isn't sitting beneath your shirt cuff I will tease you mercilessly Frills. Of course I will then oogle the watch.

    Am I only only one who perfers small, simple, "uncomplicated" watches for black tie?
     
  14. Flake

    Flake Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    975
    Joined:
    May 4, 2011
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    

    Not at all! The only watch among mine that I ever wear with black tie rig is my Breguet Classique. Time only, small seconds at 6. Hand wound white gold on black croc. Small, simple and elegant. Even then, it feels a little wrong to wear a wristwatch. :embar:
     
  15. mimo

    mimo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    7,379
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2012
    If not small, then at least proportionate to the wearer, and not obviously large. I would certainly agree that a slim watch with no extraneous pushers, bezel or other jiggery-pokery, looks more formal. I'd also suggest a black leather or croc strap is most "dressy", or even a steel one. And going further, I don't think gold works with black tie. The black and white minimalism, I think, begs for platinum/white gold/silver. Considering black tie is evening wear, I'd consider a moonphase witty, but really a simple two or three hand Calatrava, Patrimony...maybe an ultra-thin JLC...would be just lovely.

    That said, I have none of those, but I haven't been to a black tie do in a while either. I don't drink, and find the sight of inebriated bankers in novelty waistcoats and nylon socks doing the Macarena, quite revolting. But I'll endure one again sooner or later I suppose...


    Edit: Just saw Flake's post above. Great minds...
     
    Last edited: Apr 19, 2013
  16. ChicagoRon

    ChicagoRon Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,217
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2007
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    My black tie watch is a gold vintage Ulysse Nardin manual wind. Time only, very thin, 32 or 33mm with a 16 mm strap. Alas it is in Chicago and I'm in Hong Kong or I would post a photo.
     
  17. no frills

    no frills Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,204
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2013
    Location:
    NYC
    Newcomer - I am a big fan of your MUT moon! Congrats again!

    There is something to be said about whether aesthetics sing to you or not - and the combination of specific complications is part of this. For several posts, Dino944 stated how the Patek 5059's choice of cutting off the "15" and "17" in the retrograde date function didn't sit well with him visually: I had the same visceral reaction when I saw the 5059, and I really tried to like it as it has great virtues (the officer/hunter's case is to die for). I tried wearing it over and over again (six times) - but at the end it didn't sing to me as "perfect" versus, say, the 3970's overall design and choice of complications.

    Similarly, I checked out the 5496P before deciding on the 3970P. This monster retails for $115,000 (still in production!), could probably be acquired for under $100K, and features a slim profile but a larger (for Patek!) case at 39.5mm. It WEARS and LOOKS large, especially on me. And yet...




    [​IMG]

    When I wore it on my wrist a few things bothered me:

    1. There it is again, look at how the "15" and "17" are cut off by the leap year window. This is the successor to the 5050, and that feels much more balanced to me. I am sure it is a deliberate design decision to cut the "15" and "17" off because the 5050 is SMALLER at 36mm and yet does NOT cut off the "15" and "17":


    [​IMG]

    2. Check the strange spacing comparison between the "day" window of the 5496 at "9" and the "month" window at "3." For whatever reason the fonts seem differently sized or spaced, so that the "day" fonts are bigger and spaced further apart while the "month" fonts are packed more tightly together. Threw me off a bit.

    Check how the 5050's fonts are much more symmetrical.

    3. Finally, there just seemed to be a lot of empty space in the 5496's dial. Is it a function of trying to preserve the 5050's "relatively ascetic" look while enlarging the case diameter by 3.5mm? Maybe. Still, it felt too empty. I almost prefer a simple, clean Calatrava face than adding stuff that don't quite mix well and leave me... wanting (to Newcomer's point).

    Anyway, these were my niggly thoughts about the 5496P. I'm sure some people love it. If it sings to you, that's fantastic. It's got to feel perfect for you, there must be no tradeoffs, there can't be a single feeling of "man this watch is awesome, but...." ... not at these price points.

    What a coincidence, I just refi'd my house......................................... [​IMG]

    That's kind of how I keep the calories at a minimum. Wait. Each pack of Ramen has 700 calories and lots of sodium. Well, Nissin's Ramen at least. Beef flavor.

    And I like eating two packs at a time...

    Oh man. Now I have to rethink this whole ramen diet...[​IMG]

    Jacket cuff, jacket cuff, DLJr! See how careful I was in the post above to write "jacket cuff"! [​IMG]

    There is totally an argument to be made for small, simple watches for black tie!
     
  18. mimo

    mimo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    7,379
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2012

    I don't know if he watches trailer-park TV, but there is evidence that Frilly has indeed taken steps in that direction. And he's bought three of the damn things. The Daytona appears to have been relegated to "daily ramen beater"...

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Apr 19, 2013
  19. no frills

    no frills Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,204
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2013
    Location:
    NYC
    Bravo to you for wearing a 32 or 33mm piece in this day and age of ever-enlarging watch faces! Love that!
    [​IMG]
     
  20. no frills

    no frills Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,204
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2013
    Location:
    NYC
    HAHAHAHA I forgot that I posted that photo. Thanks for the reminder, mimo!

    The 3970P is a fairly recent acquisition and for the record, I did trade out one piece that my wife didn't wear at all to defray the cost. I am not a big believer in keeping a watch unworn - especially the ones that go for eye-watering prices. At least once a week or maybe start thinking about giving that thing to someone who will love it more!

    Also, the guy who sold me the 3970P was standing at a corner in NYC, opened his trenchcoat, and just offered me a deal I couldn't refuse.....

    [​IMG]
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by