1. Welcome to the new Styleforum!

    We hope you’re as excited as we are to hang out in the new place. There are more new features that we’ll announce in the near future, but for now we hope you’ll enjoy the new site.

    We are currently fine-tuning the forum for your browsing pleasure, so bear with any lingering dust as we work to make Styleforum even more awesome than it was.

    Oh, and don’t forget to head over to the Styleforum Journal, because we’re giving away two pairs of Carmina shoes to celebrate our move!

    Please address any questions about using the new forum to support@styleforum.net

    Cheers,

    The Styleforum Team

    Dismiss Notice

The Watch Appreciation Thread (Reviews and Photos of Men's Timepieces by Rolex, Patek Philippe, Brei

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by gdl203, May 20, 2007.

Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Tried and True

    Tried and True Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,506
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2014
    Location:
    Hopkins Island, Florida
    
    Neither have I.
     
  2. in stitches

    in stitches Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    68,895
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Location:
    Charm City
    I have. 2 people I can think of off hand.
     
  3. RFX45

    RFX45 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    16,312
    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Not many ADs in my area even carry Cellinis. I recently noticed the AD I frequent has one lonely piece sitting by the very corner that seemed like it's been there for maybe 5 years.
     
  4. Dino944

    Dino944 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,660
    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Location:
    Rhode Island
    I tried one on some time ago. It qualifies as a s form of weightlifting. I'm not really a Day-Date guy, but its amazing to have that much platinum on your wrist at once.

    ^^^ I find it amusing that because Omega is currently affiliated with the Bond films, they made a 50th Anniversary Goldfinger watch, even though they had nothing to do with that film. Another silly limited edition from the boys at Omega. Then we will probably will see a 20th Anniversary Goldeneye Seamaster in 2015! If we are really lucky we might get a 46th anniversary of the landing on the moon, anniversary the same year! What will the marketing team there think of next....wait for it...a 47th anniversary of the moon landing in 2016! Then they can do their 20th Anniversary of Tomorrow Never Dies in 2017...and just for the hell of it maybe they can make a Star Wars 30th Anniversary watch during the same year (why not make another limited edition movie watch for another film they had nothing to do with). Sorry for the rant. Just sick of the countless limited editions they produce.

    Yikes! I've never heard of anyone going scuba diving with a watch with less than 100m of water resistance. That could be an expensive lesson someday.
     
    2 people like this.
  5. RFX45

    RFX45 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    16,312
    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    


    Put a laser function and I am all over it!


    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2014
    2 people like this.
  6. mimo

    mimo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    7,377
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2012
    Perhaps this is just madness, but although the concept of the watch is clearly shallow marketing nonsense, I can't help looking at that phat yellow beast and thinking "but it's pretty, though...". I mean, if you had your own island and stuff kind of pretty, not every day pretty. Just saying.

    However, the platinum Roley must be the Playtona, please. Also silly of course, but doesn't mean you'd want to take it off. :)
     
  7. Dino944

    Dino944 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,660
    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Location:
    Rhode Island
    It doesn't do much for me...I don't like the "Melting dial look." I also don't think I could pay that kind of money for an Omega on a gold "Oyster bracelet." If I'm buying something on an Oyster bracelet...I'd buy a Rolex. If I'm buying an Omega I want it to look like an Omega, not the love child of a Rolex and Omega. Just my 2 cents.
     
  8. RFX45

    RFX45 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    16,312
    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Let's continue the watch discussions...

    Opinions on the new Montblanc Meisterstück Heritage Perpetual Calendar? The biggest sell for this watch right now is the price, starting at $12,800 for a perpetual calendar doesn't seem bad, no? Biggest gripe from others is the eta-2892 w/ a Dubois-Depraz module instead of an in-house movement but considering the discounts you can usually get with Montblanc (I can see it being at 40% off in the grey market within a year or two?) it seems like great price for a PC especially since the next alternative is a $20k JLC? I think people were going nuts when JLC intorduced that PC for that price.


    [​IMG]
     
    1 person likes this.
  9. tifosi

    tifosi Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    10,096
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2013
    Location:
    New Jersey
    ^^ Should have been in a MUCH smaller case.
     
    1 person likes this.
  10. Belligero

    Belligero Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    931
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2010
    Location:
    EUR
  11. DLJr

    DLJr Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,655
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2011
    Location:
    Philly Burbs
    ^Yes, the subdials are all smushed in the middle. It looks unbalanced and kind of ugly to be honest. I'm all for an affordable perpetual, but I still want it to be visually appealing.
     
  12. Dachshund

    Dachshund Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    656
    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2014
    Location:
    At large
    Looks absurd to me. Why put what is obviously a small movement in such a large case? I'm amazed they looked at this and thought, yep, job done, that looks great.
     
  13. RFX45

    RFX45 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    16,312
    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    It's 39mm, that isn't huge at all.
     
  14. tifosi

    tifosi Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    10,096
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2013
    Location:
    New Jersey
    
    OK, then they just plain screwed up the aesthetics. Those subdials are hereendous.
     
  15. dddrees

    dddrees Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,161
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2012
    Yep it has the usual sub dials that I'm used to seeing on a perpetual calendar. I'm not used to seeing a metal case with a perpetual calendar, and it certainly is an indication of what your really getting. The hands and hour markers certainly seem to go with the metal case. They look like they were cheaply done as well. I don't like the Big Crown for some reason here either and the diameter of the case looks a bit big. A nicely executed Perpetual Calendar usually brings a smile to my face, but this watch brings more of a frown to my face.
     
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2014
  16. in stitches

    in stitches Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    68,895
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Location:
    Charm City
    Dont love that one, RFX. Also, I hesitate to spend any big money on a Montblanc watch, with the exception of the Nicholas Rieussec, that I love so hard.
     
  17. Dino944

    Dino944 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,660
    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Location:
    Rhode Island
    +1,000 [​IMG]

    Value is important, but so is design, and ultimately what you are getting. Personally, a large watch case with a perpetual calendar, even at $12K plus a discount of 40% sounds nice in some respects, but when you look at it in detail its not the savings it sounds like.

    A basic, small ETA movement in an oversized case...its like looking at a guy wearing a trench coat that belonged to his brother who was 3 sizes larger. Even if its a nice coat, it sloppy in appearance...and I feel the same about small movements in large modern cases. Its just not a good fit...but its cheaper and easier than either making a movement that fits the larger case they want to use, or buying a larger movements that would look more suitable. Having all the subdials in the center of the dial and so much unused space doesn't look right to me.

    In addition, even though Montblanc has made watches now for several years, to me they are a pen company that makes watches. Yes, I know about what they are doing with various movements, but again to me they are a pen company. I don't really want a pen company wrist watch. I've used the example before, but if Heinz ketchup started making suits it does mean I would buy one. I don't really want my suits made by ketchup companies, or watches from pen companies.

    Then for me, and maybe it makes me a brand whore/snob...but I've never desired to have a Montblanc watch in my collection. Yes, maybe one of their pens would be nice, but their watches, no thanks. I've wanted to own a Rolex, watches from the big three, watches from other brands... and many of those watches/brands I've selected because of their reputation for quality, innovation, historic contributions to the watch world, because they represent a quality item in their respective price ranges, and because they fit my needs. Montblanc may have that rep with pens, but their earliest rep with watches was making flashy watches of little substance. Granted that has changed but for me not enough. While I wouldn't buy a watch just for resale, but if you get one discounted lets say to $8K, and you tire of it good luck getting your hard earned money out of it. There is a reason they sell at large discounts, there isn't much of a market for them and so they have to discount them to unload them. Comedian Dennis Miller used to essentially say, you get what you pay for... Buy one Kmart jacket, get one free. Folks 2 of sh*t is still sh*t...if they really want to f*ck you they'll give you three!" There are places I know that say...unless its a Patek, AP, VC, Lange, Rolex or Cartier, they aren't interested in buying it or taking it in trade because there is so much less interest in other brands on the secondary market. If you are going to buy a MB, buy it pre-owned and let someone else take a bath on the depreciation.

    Value is important, but to me it should be lasting, and a not simply a watch that is relatively inexpensive to get into.
    IMHO, stick to purchasing their pens.
     
    5 people like this.
  18. Viral

    Viral Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,175
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Location:
    Jersey City
    

    Y U NO KOP??
     
  19. mimo

    mimo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    7,377
    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2012
    I wouldn't buy it either - your gold Daytona is pimp with credibility. Easy win. But I do like that melting dial. It's unashamedly silly. :)

    No question. I think we've been down this road with MB a couple of times before.

    Personally they don't do much for me either. But what they do have is a strong design aesthetic: considering MB's lavish collection of brilliant horological stablemates (VC, Lange, JLC etc), it is surprising that they've come out with something so ordinary. Their collection is really quite large, yet looks like a hastily-assembled jumble of homages and obviousness. Perhaps it's because Montblanc is its own entirely separate division of the Richemont empire, while all the actual watchmakers are elsewhere, but either way you think they'd follow the principle that makes their pens sell so well: make it look like it could only be a Montblanc. That would be a good starting point.
     
  20. jbarwick

    jbarwick Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,967
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    The back is ugly too. You get to look at a huge rotor and someones bad choice to put lettering on everything they could. If they went solid caseback I am sure they would have added some damn picture to detract from it as well.

    [​IMG]
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by