1. Welcome to the new Styleforum!

    We hope you’re as excited as we are to hang out in the new place. There are more new features that we’ll announce in the near future, but for now we hope you’ll enjoy the new site.

    We are currently fine-tuning the forum for your browsing pleasure, so bear with any lingering dust as we work to make Styleforum even more awesome than it was.

    Oh, and don’t forget to head over to the Styleforum Journal, because we’re giving away two pairs of Carmina shoes to celebrate our move!

    Please address any questions about using the new forum to support@styleforum.net

    Cheers,

    The Styleforum Team

    Dismiss Notice

The Name's Ford, Tom Ford

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by bourbonbasted, Nov 4, 2011.

  1. NotoriousMarquis

    NotoriousMarquis Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    885
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2010
    Location:
    New York/Chicago
    I don't think they're necessarily indicative of the fashion of the era at all. I think the suits connery and brosnan wear are pertty timeless, and I think rodger moore's wide lapel lesure suit 1970's nonsense is pretty terrible.

    Brosnan was a great bond, he was funny, suave, he looked the part. If you read the books bond is coy, and only connery and brosnan have been able to pull that off to such a degree.

    But what about better tailors. I'd take a bond in corneliani or brioni over TF any day. Fuck Isaia would even be great. But if we're going to be traditional about it, why not dunhill, aquascutum, or any of the numbers on saville row who can piece together a pretty sharp suit on request. Or if we're going to be innovative about it, Gieves and Hawkes. But tom ford looks silly, and its bad, and its over priced, and colin firth too looks totally ridiculous.

    I'm sorry but I think that almost everything with tom ford is loud and not in a way that attractive, but in a way that offensive.
     
  2. Klobber

    Klobber Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,272
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2010
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Poor Tom Ford, a hater exists here. Persecute, condemn the heretic :laugh:


    I did not understand the Shining :puzzled:

    The Kubrick surrealism made the film hard to understand, was Jack a reincarnation or something? He has always been the caretaker, I mean WTF ???? Whats up with that photo in the end of the film? Even if the film is about "cabin fever", it is clear his wierdo wife and kid could see the same spooky stuff he did, i.e. the guy in the bear suit doing wierd things in the room with another guy etc ....

    Film does not make sense, it makes even less sense than Twin Peaks or Mulholland Drive!

    Shining is a great film anyway, possibly a classic. Must watch again.

    I did feel sorry for Tony, when Danny gets older and starts to masturbate, what will Tony do?
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2011
  3. Von Franz

    Von Franz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    161
    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    The thing that needs to be understood about James Bond, or at least the cinematic version, is that each iteration of the character must fit into the time period of the film.
    Connery's Bond, for example, wore slim, understated suits and dark knit ties because that was what blended in during the 1960's.
    Tom Ford would not, probably, not have been appropriate for the versions of James Bond that came before Daniel Craig's, but the style works well with modern tastes as well as with the way Craig portrays the character.

    I don't think the literary Bond would ever wear a Tom Ford suit, but he was somewhat of a minimalist in both emotional expression and personal habit.
    People will tend to remember that he enjoyed champagne and caviar, but not necessarily that he used both as an accompaniment to a big plate of plain scrambled eggs, and that that could just as easily have been dinner or breakfast for him.
    He chose simple, good things that he liked, and distributed them uniformly throughout his life so he didn't have to think so much about them.

    The version Daniel Craig plays is far more suited to costumes by Ford, as there is a much stronger kinetic and emotional component present. He uses parkour maneuvers and blows things up whenever he can. Quantum of Solace and a good portion of Casino Royale were based on Bond's Vesper-related emotional trauma and the revenge he sought because of it. With that in mind, a more indulgent and expressive mode of dress seems reasonable. Tom Ford's pieces are also arguably some of the more subtly iconoclastic men's clothes around today, and with the James Bond franchise having had a "gritty reboot" in the last few installments (and, inconsequential as it may seem, the casting of a blond actor in a the role of a historically dark-haired character) it all seems reasonable enough to me.

    -Von Franz
     
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2011
    2 people like this.
  4. Superfluous

    Superfluous Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,058
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2010
    Location:
    Dallas
    

    You seem to not know what you're talking about.
     
  5. hendrix

    hendrix Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,452
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    

    About as timeless as Craig's TF.

    You can clearly see the the suits Connery and Brosnan were related to the period of the films, dunno how you could miss that.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    Agree with Von Franz.
     
  6. JubeiSpiegel

    JubeiSpiegel Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,371
    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Location:
    Sartorial Wasteland
    As is expected, Tom Ford now defines the style of Daniel Craig's Bond. Which is fine, i do not have a problem with the styling at all (in fact i'm a huge Tom Ford fan). It is a mutual symbiotic relationship of exposure and contemporary flair, for both franchise and fashion house.

    In regards to Bonds of old being better. Old James Bond was comic book sensationalism, new Bond is realistic grittiness, which i also have no problem with.
     
    1 person likes this.
  7. NotoriousMarquis

    NotoriousMarquis Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    885
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2010
    Location:
    New York/Chicago
    

    No I totally agree the movie is asinine. it's over hyped, its got very little fear aside from the moments of mundane things happening over scary music. it makes no sense—jack nicholson is an asshoe from the beginning so the jump from asshole to psycho isnt so big. But to be fair, it was right before halloween festivities at school and it was showing for free and they had candy. I really take any opportunity to go to the movies with a girl i like, and to sit in our gorgeous performance hall. School events are fun.
     
  8. miran

    miran Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    524
    Joined:
    May 3, 2010
    

    That's not a spider monkey....that's a snowboarding lemur....
     
  9. NotoriousMarquis

    NotoriousMarquis Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    885
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2010
    Location:
    New York/Chicago
    I think von franz articulated it well. Maybe tf is appropriate for craig, but i think quantum of solace was complete crap (both as a part of the bond series, and as a movie on its own), and I think daniel craig is too moody and too brutish to be james bond. So for this non james bond who is hardly refined, sure, tom ford might fit.



    And no, to be perfectly honest I could wear either of those suits today. The former looks like my grandfather's suits from the 50's, and like my uncle's british suits made today. The latter image looks almost like a suit from any film by fellini, and yet it was made for a 90's movie. Neither of these suits would be inappropriate at any point in time, whereas put TF in the 60's, or 90s, or even 10 years from now and it will look, as i said before, quite garish.
     
  10. hendrix

    hendrix Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,452
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    The only thing worse than people promoting "timeless" items is people who don't understand that what works for one person may not work for another.

    The right person could definitely wear TF in 20 years, just as some people pull off the 60s style suits today (but most don't).
    Being able to tell when something was made doesn't mean it's dated and can't be worn in other periods.
    It depends on your taste and what works for you.
     
  11. othertravel

    othertravel Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,417
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
  12. Superfluous

    Superfluous Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,058
    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2010
    Location:
    Dallas
    

    Slim lapels and center vent? :uhoh:
     
  13. imageWIS

    imageWIS Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    20,008
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Location:
    New York City / Buenos Aires
    

    + a billion. Slim lapels, would rather not have, but ok, passable. Single rear vent is un-fucking-forgivable. I only have two items with a single rear vent: a blue american-style Polo sports coat and an american style blue pinstripe suit (a-la brooks brothers). What Craig is wearing however yearns for a double vent.
     
  14. Klobber

    Klobber Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,272
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2010
    Location:
    San Francisco
    

    + 1. As for slim lapels, they are getting long in the tooth now. Dont hate them, dont like them, just blah...
     
  15. othertravel

    othertravel Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,417
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Maybe a center vent better accommodates a running scene, as shown in the pic (i.e. a double vent might 'flap around' when he's running). Just a theory.
     
  16. Artigas

    Artigas Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    197
    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
  17. GradSchooler

    GradSchooler Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    811
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Location:
    Delta, British Columbia
    When Daniel Craig was raving about the new look for Bond in Skyfall that he and Tom Ford had come up with I would never have imagined slim lapels and a center vent. Not to mention the three button cuff and lack of a ticket pocket. There's nothing about this suit that says Tom Ford. All the signature touches are missing :(
     
  18. GradSchooler

    GradSchooler Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    811
    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Location:
    Delta, British Columbia
    

    Except that the skirt of his jackets for Quantum of Solace was specifically designed to have more "swishy-ness". Unless this was an order from Mendes, I can't see this being the reason.
     
  19. Quarks

    Quarks Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    221
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2011
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by