1. Welcome to the new Styleforum!

    We hope you’re as excited as we are to hang out in the new place. There are more new features that we’ll announce in the near future, but for now we hope you’ll enjoy the new site.

    We are currently fine-tuning the forum for your browsing pleasure, so bear with any lingering dust as we work to make Styleforum even more awesome than it was.

    Oh, and don’t forget to head over to the Styleforum Journal, because we’re giving away two pairs of Carmina shoes to celebrate our move!

    Please address any questions about using the new forum to support@styleforum.net

    Cheers,

    The Styleforum Team

    Dismiss Notice

How We Used to Dress

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by comrade, Jul 14, 2013.

  1. Calder

    Calder Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    165
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2011
    I stopped reading when the Homophobia began in that article.

    Describing something as "disgusting" is not respectful. The article writer is a bigot. Heaven help her children should one of them turn out to be gay.
     
    1 person likes this.
  2. Apollotrader

    Apollotrader Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    530
    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2012
    Location:
    Paradise Valley, AZ
    Hilary was denied the right to wear skirts in the White House....

    Her balls were showing.
     
    1 person likes this.
  3. Veremund

    Veremund Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,467
    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Location:
    Frankfurt, Germany
    

    Really? Describing gay people as disgusting is respectful? You're either a joke, or sad.
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. archibaldleach

    archibaldleach Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,222
    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    

    I'm assuming he was referring more to the general crux of her argument in the article overall and how she was responding to people who disagreed with her view, not so much her thoughts on things that only were tagentially related despite her effort to spend a sentence tying them in.
     
  5. David Copeland

    David Copeland Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    900
    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2013
    Location:
    Originally from Newport Beach - Now living in West
    Your intelligence is admired and noted.
     
  6. David Copeland

    David Copeland Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    900
    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2013
    Location:
    Originally from Newport Beach - Now living in West
    You seem to be well adjusted too. I appreciate your insight.
     
  7. IrateCustomer

    IrateCustomer Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,723
    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2011
    Location:
    Spooning DerekS
    Some of you guys are pretty funny. Dress codes are just another company policy, and if any employees don't agree with the dress code, they don't have to work there. But it is quite legal to define what "professional" indicates in the view of the company. The argument regarding Hooters illustrates this perfectly. They set a dress code, and the employees have to adhere to it or be their employment will be terminated. Same goes with Trump's dress code. There is literally, zero difference. So, your personal views of what is a sexist dress code and what isn't doesn't mean anything, other than you just disagree with the company's policy.
     
  8. dbhdnhdbh

    dbhdnhdbh Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    330
    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2012
    She makes a good point, apparently inadvertently. It is perfectly fine for her to choose to wear skirts. It to is odd, but fine, for her to attach religious significance to her skirt-wearing. I am pretty sure that the majority of women who wear skirts are not Christians.


    Her homophobic bigotry is disgusting, but does anyone see the irony in using her post as support for policies requiring women to wear skirts or dresses? The entire post is about her CHOICE of how to dress. She wants to wear skirts, so she does. How can this support prohibiting women from wearing pants?
     
  9. dbhdnhdbh

    dbhdnhdbh Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    330
    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2012
    Back to clothes.

    I do love the old clothes, but I do not lose a wink of sleep over how other people dress. In fact, the low popylarity of my favorite clothes makes them available dirt cheap at thrifts and on ebay. I hope I remain in the minority.

    I agree that the men in that photo are well dressed, but I have my doubt's that it represents a random selection of New Yorkers. First, appropos the discussion of dress codes, note that they are all men. No women, skirt-wearing or otherwise. Not likely to have happened by chance. They were clearly posed for the picture. They were selected to be all men,I suppose for some reason that would have made sense back then. I see no reason to assume it was the first 60 men to come along.
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2013
  10. archibaldleach

    archibaldleach Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,222
    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    

    One can make a "choice" to do things and also argue that a particular choice is the better one. It's pretty clear that this is what she is doing. While she may be understanding towards those who disagree with her views, nothing in the article suggests that she thinks they are right. I think you are just a bit too eager to find "irony" here.
     
  11. Claghorn

    Claghorn Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    10,003
    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Location:
    Texas.
    He's not suggesting that there is irony in the post itself but that there is irony in Copeland's use of the post.
     
  12. msulinski

    msulinski Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,139
    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Location:
    NYC
    
    Yes, I believe David thought this article would somehow convince us that the skirts-only policy at his office is ok, or at least give us a better understanding of why someone might have this policy. For me, it did the opposite.
     
  13. archibaldleach

    archibaldleach Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,222
    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    

    Yeah, I got that. Just see his use of it more as ineffectual than ironic.
     
  14. David Copeland

    David Copeland Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    900
    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2013
    Location:
    Originally from Newport Beach - Now living in West
    Fox News Bill O'Riley agrees in large part when he told his audience last Monday to stop whining about various diseases of attitude in language and home-spun culture. Kids, teenagers, young and older adults will face the music when they take their relaxed attitudes to many of the major work places and expect a democracy.
     
  15. David Copeland

    David Copeland Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    900
    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2013
    Location:
    Originally from Newport Beach - Now living in West
    The majority of women on the planet are Muslims.
     
  16. David Copeland

    David Copeland Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    900
    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2013
    Location:
    Originally from Newport Beach - Now living in West
    Funny how many here chastise me for posting one (1) simply opinion link . . . yet no one else has gone to the effort of espousing a series of counter links supporting their views.

    Hey folks, it's not just the USA. Take a look outside the bubble bath at how the "BILLIONS" of people on the earth teach and practice their theme of women hiding their butts under modest shirts and dresses. The USA amounts to a fraction of the world population. England amounts to the size of Oregon.

    The title of this topic is "How we used to dress". Feel free to post links, pictures, and historical evidence during the last 7,000 years of recorded time to support your view. If not, then opinions are just shallow ideas.
     
  17. ASNY2VA

    ASNY2VA Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    149
    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2011
    Location:
    Virginia
    People in general probably don't dress properly or appropriately as much as in the past, but I think part of that is because at least up to a point, what was available then was a lot less varied. The options may have been limited to dress clothes/ formal wear, workwear type clothes, and not much in between. In other words, in 1929, there weren't Croc Sandals, or Big Dog T shirts.
     
  18. Upward

    Upward Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    114
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2013
    If that is true, then how do you explain George Steinbrenners policy of only clean shaven men with haircuts can play on his team?
     
  19. Apollotrader

    Apollotrader Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    530
    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2012
    Location:
    Paradise Valley, AZ
    David, who died and appointed you Cruise Director?
     
  20. bertie

    bertie Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    808
    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Location:
    North of
    

    Really?
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by