1. Welcome to the new Styleforum!

    We hope you’re as excited as we are to hang out in the new place. There are more new features that we’ll announce in the near future, but for now we hope you’ll enjoy the new site.

    We are currently fine-tuning the forum for your browsing pleasure, so bear with any lingering dust as we work to make Styleforum even more awesome than it was.

    Oh, and don’t forget to head over to the Styleforum Journal, because we’re giving away two pairs of Carmina shoes to celebrate our move!

    Please address any questions about using the new forum to support@styleforum.net


    The Styleforum Team

    Dismiss Notice

Camper shoes

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by rcm55910, Aug 19, 2002.

  1. rcm55910

    rcm55910 Member

    May 6, 2002
    How do these casual shoes compare to the aforementioned brands and are they in fact worth 150 dollars.
  2. LA Guy

    LA Guy Opposite Santa Staff Member

    Mar 8, 2002
    Moscow, Idaho
    The styles are really different, so it's difficult to compare them. Campers have a sort of underdog charm, with a appeal similar to that of Clark's Wallabees, and are a lot more stylish than lowbrow Kenneth Coles or Steve Maddens, in my opinion. I wore Camper shoes exclusively about 2 years ago, but I think that the look is a little played out now, and they are appearing regularly at Shoe Pavilion and similar discounters certainly.

    I ultimately abandoned Campers because they just weren't as versatile as say, a pair of Puma Temos, and yet were significantly more expensive. If you decide to get a pair, there is a small selection of styles available at Shoe Pavilion, and a considerably wider range of styles available at Bluefly. I certainly wouldn't pay retail for them at this point.
  3. Joe G

    Joe G Well-Known Member

    May 22, 2002
    US$150? That's pretty pricey. In Europe they're more than 30% less.

    As for Campers in general, though, they're not bad for the money. I would say that Docs are slightly better, quality-wise. (Be they the US$100 Doc Marten version, or the 4x as expensive but identical Yohji Yamamoto version.) Still, they're definitely a step up from that Kenneth Cole dross.

    Still, only get them if you want to wear the same shoes that literally every four of five Southern European and Gulf State (UAE, Bahrain, etc.) twentysomething, go for it. Now, there are some originals who can use them despite their rampant popularity to good effect (a friend of mine in Brussels wears red ones exclusively, and another friend who's about to enter the Peace Corps has a pair of bright blue ones in his closet), but for most, it's strictly a lemming choice.



Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by