1. Welcome to the new Styleforum!

    We hope you’re as excited as we are to hang out in the new place. There are more new features that we’ll announce in the near future, but for now we hope you’ll enjoy the new site.

    We are currently fine-tuning the forum for your browsing pleasure, so bear with any lingering dust as we work to make Styleforum even more awesome than it was.

    Oh, and don’t forget to head over to the Styleforum Journal, because we’re giving away two pairs of Carmina shoes to celebrate our move!

    Please address any questions about using the new forum to support@styleforum.net

    Cheers,

    The Styleforum Team

    Dismiss Notice

Appeal of Panerai?

Discussion in 'Classic Menswear' started by dopey, Oct 17, 2008.

  1. Kaplan

    Kaplan Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,171
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Location:
    In Hedonic Decline
  2. Blackhood

    Blackhood Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,904
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Location:
    Cambridge, UK
    For me Pan's are like Knoll furniture; amazing as exercising and implementing simplicity and function, amazing in a book or on a billboard, but not something I could incorporate into my day to day life.

    I once knew an older gent who would describe such "designed" items as "incompatible with wiping my arse". That is, if you couldn't look at it while using the bathroom, then he couldn't own it. (Metaphorically of course, there are many items that simply wouldn't fit in a bathroom. A car or horse for example.)
     
  3. Frank the sheep

    Frank the sheep Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    863
    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Location:
    Sweden
    Thanks! :cheers:

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2013
  4. dbln79

    dbln79 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    45
    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2012
    Location:
    Washington DC
    I really do think people love them or hate them. At first I didn't see the appeal, but the more you look at them, the more you appreciate a simple yet unique design. I don't think Panerai is for everyone and I think on some people it can look a little gaudy, but if the watch consumer feels satisfied with his/her purchase, then let them rejoice. For my initial foray into Panerai, I went "base is ace." (112)


    [​IMG]
     
  5. romafan

    romafan Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    8,915
    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Location:
    NYC
    I know this is the fashion now, but those giant watches (and I'm aware that there are larger ones) look, to my mind, ridiculous on medium - smaller wrists.
     
    2 people like this.
  6. Goodman

    Goodman Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    312
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    DBln and I are of the same opinion on this matter - right down to the particular watch
    [​IMG]
     
    1 person likes this.
  7. dbln79

    dbln79 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    45
    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2012
    Location:
    Washington DC
    Nice piece Goodman!

    Romafan, I somewhat agree with you. My wrist is around 7.5 and I don't think I'd go larger than a 44mm. My brother was an early adopter in the Panerai movement and I didn't understand his infatuation...until I tried one on. I have four pieces, a new Exp II Polar, a JLC Dualtime, an Omega SMP Chrono and the 112. I get the most compliments on the 112. Would I wear it with a suit? Probably not. Will I wear it on casual Fridays and throughout the weekend? Most definitely.
     
  8. Prince of Paisley

    Prince of Paisley Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,432
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Location:
    Sydney
    The 42mm 1940 Radiomirs shown this year are an interesting development, the thinnest PAMs ever... I wonder if the proportions that make the Panerai design so unique will work at a smaller scale? Or do these watches look best at their biggest?
     
  9. Goodman

    Goodman Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    312
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    Once again we're of the same mind. I've tried on the 47mm Pams (Luminors and Rads) and I just found them too big. A colleague of mine wears a 38mm Omega and I find that way to small. While the 112 is a big watch - its simplicity tones down the size. It's akin to pairing say a Prince of Wales suit with a solid shirt and simple tie vs a bold gingham shirt and large paisley tie. Worn the first way you look great. Worn the other you look clownish. Having said that, if you've got big arms 47mm might be perfect or, if you think it's cool or just love the California dial, wear a 47mm watch. What do I care.
     
  10. kubunggo

    kubunggo Member

    Messages:
    8
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2010
    [​IMG]

    Had this since 2004, and it still captures the imagination ten years later.
     
  11. stro

    stro Active Member

    Messages:
    28
    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2014
    heh, you gotta love this place [​IMG]
     

Share This Page

Styleforum is proudly sponsored by