Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tokyo Slim 
Not just conveniences either. Things like ABS, airbags, decent seatbelts, crash protection, stiffer chassis (because of new and better torsion control methods, and honestly - better parts) suspension, paint, and the interior elements are better than they were in the 70's (may be some of the only "iconic" cars that are higher quality now than they were originally!) Not to mention more horsepower, AND better fuel economy.

+10^100 I'm probably the only SFer who drives a '70's car to work every day. It's not for love. Driving one of those cars every day is, quite frankly, an exercise in fear. I know the guy in front of me is going to outbreak me in virtually any condition, and I will plough into him if I don't keep a larger offset. Going uphill in a heavy RWD car in the snow without a posi is futile. I keep chains. I've used them three times this season. Going downhill in bad conditions in a heavy RWD car with disc/front drum/rear breaks is a dance of death, because they never, ever, break evenly, one side always breaks more, inducing a...wait for it...spin. Plus a Mini could probably overtake me, though I've a 318/4bbl. TopGear once had a show where Clarkson ran around in an XKE that had a full chassis redo -- 4 wheel disks, modern suspension, modern steering. Now
that is a proper E-Type that won't kill you. So yeah, classic styling, modern engineering FTW.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DarkNWorn 
I just cringe when I see a remake of a classic. Let the classics be classic. Are they fucking lazy? All these years and they have to borrow style from the old cars?
I wonder if the designers are just getting back to ground here -- for two decades and change US carmakers have been making incredibly boring, banal vehicles. Going retro at least allows them to appeal to the...er.. mature generation with memories of cars past, as well as a disillusioned younger generation while proving that design can sell cars. Not medicrity. ~ H