Originally Posted by DocHolliday
Apparently you could read Manton's mind, as you were so certain of the meaning of his ambiguously worded post that you appointed yourself his defender. Perhaps you'd understood the intended humor had you read our previous exchanges or, I dunno, been involved. Would you like to bring your post count up to 31 with another definitive statement on this topic?
Ha. Woah, there gunslinger. Our entire exchange is inane, but it is worth responding once more since you apparently never let a good opportunity to reveal your stupidity go to waste. I hope you'll come through again. 1. First, I was genuinely curious whether you knew of a better word, as I thought--foolishly, I now realize--that someone here besides Manton actually had some style or knowledge regarding a subject other than clothing (i.e., language, in this case). That is, I thought you might have something interesting to say. Nope. 2. The original post is not ambiguous: http://www.styleforum.net/showpost.p...&postcount=375
3. 9000 posts or not, you are obviously, well, not very bright, to say the least. And I'm unsure that you actually were intending to joke with Manton now that you have said that you think his original use of the word was ambiguous. If you were, it was a real knee-slapper!