I'm a lifelong Dodger fan, too, but I see things the same way you do. I'm a baseball geek and I can't deny the park/league/defense effect when comparing pitchers across eras. ERA+ for best 5 year stretch from assorted pitchers. Koufax: 141, 159, 187, 160, 190 Maddux: 271, 262, 162, 189, 187 Pedro: 243, 291, 189, 202, 210 Unit: 135, 186, 181, 188, 197 Those numbers represent ERA adjusted for ballpark and league, and it's scaled at 100 = league average. Maddux and Pedro were clearly more dominant in their primes than any other pitchers. Pedro was over 100% better than the league over a 5 year period - that's insane and significantly better than anyone, ever. His 2000 season is crazy - 1.74 era in a year when the league was 5.07, pitching in the best hitter's park in the AL, in the strongest division in baseball. .737 runners per inning. 284 strikeouts and 32 walks. Unreal. rnoldh: in 1963, when Koufax had a 1.88 ERA, the NL ERA as a whole was 2.99. And Dodger Stadium at that time was probably the greatest pitcher's park in modern baseball history. I love Koufax, but you can't deny the effects of park and era.