Henry Carter
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2009
- Messages
- 4,471
- Reaction score
- 4,218
I was referring generally to anyone not Patrick, though he worked with a shirt maker in Jermyn Street not with a tailor on the Row, so the correct term would be shirt maker if you want to be technical. So the term P.Johnson tailors is correct, because as a company they still employ tailors to make the actual clothes to ones measurements, but the person fitting those clothes is in this case not a tailor.
Heres some homework for you - http://www.smh.com.au/executive-style/style/in-the-hands-of-a-few-good-men-20120718-22adw.html
Nope it's not as cutaway. I don't know how it bends down to be honest, good genetics?
But Patrick went to the Row for an extended period of time? He wasn't there just to learn how to fit a suit. He learned how to make a suit. If he wanted to, he could make suits for all his clients, which makes him a tailor. Just because he decides not to make the suit doesn't relinquish his title as a tailor.
My example was a bit extreme, but in this instance, I think it is accurate for Patrick to call himself a tailor.
I was referring generally to anyone not Patrick, though he worked with a shirt maker in Jermyn Street not with a tailor on the Row, so the correct term would be shirt maker if you want to be technical. So the term P.Johnson tailors is correct, because as a company they still employ tailors to make the actual clothes to ones measurements, but the person fitting those clothes is in this case not a tailor.
Heres some homework for you - http://www.smh.com.au/executive-style/style/in-the-hands-of-a-few-good-men-20120718-22adw.html
How do you always manage to get the front of your collar to bend down either side perfectly, everytime?
That collar isn't as 'cutaway' as the HC ones, right?
Nope it's not as cutaway. I don't know how it bends down to be honest, good genetics?